Strategy Shift
Mentor considers spinning off Precedence, Exemplar
By M. Santarini, R. Goering, EE Times
Wilsonville, Ore. -- Signaling a major strategy shift that would permit
it to refocus on its core businesses, Mentor Graphics Corp. is said to be
weighing the spinoff or divestiture of several design-automation business
units, including simulation-backplane specialist Precedence Inc. (Campbell,
Calif.) and FPGA-synthesis provider Exemplar Logic (Alameda, Calif.).
Though Mentor denied that any active spinoff discussions are taking place,
rumors about an Exemplar move apparently drove Mentor's stock to 13 1/8 on
Aug. 27, just shy of its 52-week high, several analysts said. Independently,
sources close to Mentor and Precedence said that the companies are negotiating
Precedence's freedom and that an initial public offering could result.
For Precedence, independence could help it proliferate its simulation-integration
technology more widely. For Mentor, the action would permit it to return
to its roots.
In the case of an Exemplar Logic spinoff, Mentor would effectively quit the
synthesis business because Mentor has transferred its synthesis R&D to
that company.
Any such reshuffling by Mentor would signal that its recent acquisitions
have apparently hampered its attempts to return to profitability. In the
company's most recent financial statement, Wally Rhines, president and chief
executive officer, said that Mentor "will continue to deal with the effects
of the many acquisitions we made in 1995 and 1996. These acquisitions clearly
provide a platform for accelerated growth, but in the short term have resulted
in significant operating inefficiencies. Progress is being made and will
become increasingly evident."
"It is no secret that a number of our subsidiaries are set up as autonomous
units," said Dean Freed, vice president and general counsel at Mentor. "The
autonomous nature of these units means it is relatively easy to do a spinoff,
but at this time there is no news and nothing to announce."
Mentor acquired Exemplar in May 1995 and Precedence in October of that year,
maintaining both as subsidiaries. But some analysts said that Mentor may
have overextended itself.
"Mentor is looking at all of its assets right now, and part of that process
includes deciding to make acquisitions or divestitures," said Rita Glover,
president of EDA Today (Tucson, Ariz.). "I believe that the company is
strategically positioning some of its assets to be spun out if they so chose
in the future. Precedence and also Exemplar are in that position."
Precedence, the only company that offers vendor-independent simulation-backplane
technology, supports EDA vendors such as Mentor, Cadence, Synopsys, Analogy,
Quickturn and Ikos with its SimMatrix offering. With its newly announced
SimPrism partitioning software (see Aug. 25, page 56), the company seeks
to expand into mechanical design and simulation.
When Mentor acquired Precedence, some analysts and competitors were concerned
that Mentor's ownership might bias the company toward Mentor's own simulation
offerings. Even though Precedence has continued to work with other vendors,
independence would put to rest any such fears by EDA providers or customers.
Precedence also has momentum in its favor and could fare well as an independent.
Currently, the company claims a 70 percent compound annual growth rate and
more than 3,200 installed seats. It also intends to expand its product line
to ease design reuse and system assembly in an independent environment.
In addition, Precedence is breaking away from electronic simulation and venturing
into a broader market. Kevin Jorgensen, vice president of marketing, said
the company plans to create a simulation backplane for micro-electromechanical
systems that would let designers simulate an on-chip mechanical device with
the rest of their design.
(Next article.)
(c) 1997 CMP Media, Inc
[This article comes from EE Times in a joint cooperative effort
with the Motley Fool. For more articles like it, please look at Fool's Gold
every weekend or simply go to the Fool's Gold Mine and page through our back
issues, which all have clever and cool EE Times articles in
them.]
|