Welcome to the Motley Fool Shop at FoolMart
We'll burn that bridge when we come to it. -- Matt Goukas
home help index search messages Iomega in Fooldom Today
quote.fool.comToday's FeaturesQuotes, News, Charts, Data

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   

This Feature

IOM In Fooldom
Introduction
We Deliver!
IOM Archives
Iomega Message Board

Related Items

The Fribble
Free Registration
Log In
Guest Viewing

Monday, December 29, 1997

Friday, Iomega closed at $12 5/16, down $3/16 (-1.50%).

THIS WEEKEND'S RECAP: Following the holiday break and abbreviated trading day on Friday, Iomega board posters reacted to news about Nomai disks being available for sale in Germany (see ~DaleVelk~'s post), earnings, clik!, and other tech stocks.

Enjoy!

INDEX: Use the Search or Find feature of your word processor to locate the article number (Find: 1++, 3++, etc.) - or use AOL's Edit>>Find in Top Window Feature. If Find in Top Window is dimmed, just click on some text, anything, in the IOM Today window and try again.

1++ JOHKGUN analyzes earning potential for Iomega
2++ TMF 2Aruba on the potential of clik!
3++ Huibs pht answers a query about Zip milestone announcements
4++ HMAletter questions future Iomega products and earnings/market cap
5++ DaleVelk posts the URL for a news announcement of Nomai disks sellable in Germany
6++ Sunraydoc responds to the Nomai news
7++ W1G compares IOM to other tech stocks' 97 highs

Recap written by TMF Weekly; posts compiled by TMF Weekly.
Edited and mailed by TMF Selena.
Kudos? Gripes? Questions? Let us know.

As always, the following posts represent the thoughts of our contributors, not those of The Motley Fool.


And now, the Best of the Board...Started 8:01pm ET 12/26/97.

1+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Subject: Re: YTD return
Date: Fri, Dec 26, 1997 15:56 EST
From: JOHKGUN

how about the earnings growth vs carryforward p/e? It is selling at carryforward p/e of 20 while earnings is still growing at 39%. undervalued? may be. Overvalued? obviously NOT!

say, IOM grows another 30% the following year, its carryforward p/e would have dropped to $1.60/$24 = 15; but, this company is still growing its earnings at 35% annually(39%/30% = 69%/2 = approximately 35%). And, it is selling at carryforward p/e of only 15. So, two years out, IOM should double if given proper valuation to its growth rate. We will see! Of course, all prices pre-split and do not include revenue from 'click"(potential is bigger than zip, I read somewhere, I think IBD.)

2+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Subject: Re: YTD return
Date: Fri, Dec 26, 1997 19:58 EST
From: TMF 2Aruba

<<We will see! Of course, all prices pre-split and do not include revenue from 'click" (potential is bigger than zip, I read somewhere, I think IBD.)>>

Johkgun,

You're absolutely correct as to what you read. It was IBD, but it was Stan Corker from Emerald who said it.

"Iomega hopes for the same results with its new portable disk drive. ''Potentially Clik can be bigger than Zip,'' said Stan Corker of Emerald Research."

It's this "potential" that's keeping me from selling any of my shares. ; )

3+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Subject: Re: "shipment press releases"
Date: Sat, Dec 27, 1997 09:41 EST
From: Huibs pht

<< 11 million shiped etc is this number of zips sold to retailers? oem? combined? >>

..iomega has annonuced milestones that represent the number of Zip drives shipped..

..ALL varieties...oem/aftermrket/etc..

..this number does NOT include those Zips made by the liscensees....MCI/NEC..

..Iomega has stated that they will stop announcing this figure in the future, and I'd guess, that some of the reasoning may have to do with the fact that MCI/NEC will be ramping, and the total # of drives would be more difficult to quantify..

4+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Subject: Re: YTD return
Date: Sat, Dec 27, 1997 10:10 EST
From: HMAletter

<<..yeah, but Steve, Kim Edwards recently spoke of being a 5 BILLION dollar company..>>

Huibs: That is great. But the numbers have to come from somewhere,. I have experienced the same trouble in future estimates as all of Wall Street, and they have much more access than I.

Cannot estimate anything for Clik, Zip 200, or even gratiating OEM internal margins without stretching the guesswork too far. Internal margins for OEM drives are known to reduce the eps growth rate going forward. That will presumably be made up for by volume and margins on disks. Some with new products. I have estimated (perhaps more gratious than most analysts), over 100 million zips in the market inside of 5 years. Given than that growth must come primarily from the box makers, both revenues and earnings are reduced per unit going forward as percentage of Zips to OEM becomes the dominant segment.

Disk sales to this market segment are initially lower, and are difficult to compute going forward as well. The reasons have been well documented here and elsewhere, primarily due to the fact that retail customers specifically bought Zip, where as the boxes have a built-in inclusionary factor that lowers the tie ratio for this non-targeted group.

It is also an unknown at this point how much of an effect the 200 MB drive will have on the oem channel.

1) The product is not in the marketplace yet.

2) It is not known what margins these devices will deliver )I presume higher)

3) It is not known when, or how the 200MB drive will enter the OEM channel.

The JAZ 2 GB is also an unknown quantity.

Clik will have to prove its metal in the marketplace (the OEM acceptance marketplace).

These are the unknowns. Most of the hardcore facts are unknown, and are compounded by the fact that vital pieces of financial data are also unknown. This is why the stock remains volatile and not as closely followed as some others. I am not throwing out negatives, but merely stating the same quaestions that have been thrown around here for 2+ years.

It's easier to throw up a figure than it is to break down the unit sales needed to obtain those figures. If you start your forecast with estimated unit shipments per product segment, you will see how hard it is to achieve those $3 to $5 billion revenue targets. I.m not saying they won't, I'm just saying I don't have (and neither do the analysts), enough good info to get to them yet myself.

5+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Subject: German/French Rulings on Nomai Disks
Date: Sat, Dec 27, 1997 14:24 EST
From: DaleVelk

http://www.zdnet.de/news/artikel/1997/12/24002-wf.htm

Iomega Zip-Drive: Boeder darf geklonte Disk v...

From the automated translation it appears that Nomai Zip disks may now be sold in Germany but the packaging may not state "100% compatible" but may say "for Zip drives"

6+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Subject: Re: German/French Rulings on Nomai Disks
Date: Sat, Dec 27, 1997 17:51 EST
From: Sunraydoc

<< I have to think that supplies of Zip drives in Germany will be tight for a couple of weeks as Iomega replaces the inventory there with the (assumed) redesigned ATAPI and external Zip drives. >>

I agree, Dan. And if our understanding of retroreflector technology is correct, and I think it is (thanks to AuntArctic) Iomega may not have a single, discrete design in mind. They could induce a "wobble' in the position of their emitter/detector from one lot to the next, for example, or put light baffles with randomly variable properties in selected drives, or in all drives.

Iomega has lots of ways, IMO, of making compatibility an endlessly moving target for would-be pirates with "reverse-engineered" disks of questionable quality. The licensees knew this going in, or they wouldn't have signed on.

The Nomai disk an enormous defeat? I doubt it. Even to call this a significant setback would be phrasing it too strongly, in my view. Gillette has had a much tougher row to hoe so far as cloners are concerned, and they certainly can't be accused of being unprofitable---it seems many people would rather buy Gillette blades than save a few bucks on the clones. Now imagine how well the cloned blades would sell if they only worked in some, not all, of the Gillette razors they were designed to fit.

7+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Subject: Iomega in Perspective for l997
Date: Sun, Dec 28, 1997 13:48 EST
From: W1G

In reading my Daily Graph charts, I find that IOM has suffered a lot less than most of the other computer related stocks out there. When the rest of the industry picks up then IOM will probably make up for lost ground quickly. Here is a comparison of the percentage off the l997 highs of IOM compared with a sampling of other computer stocks.

Percentage off l997 Highs

Iomega              27%
Intel               31%
Microsoft           20%
Newbridge Net       52%
Novell              44%
Oracle              49%
Quantum             55%
Seagate             65%
Sybase              47%
Western Digital     73%
C Cube Micro        58%

As you are probably aware, Microsoft, lost most of its percentage in the last week or two and its chart looks dismal. The point I am trying to make is that it could be worse and the downfall of IOM is primarily due to association with the industry not fundamentals.

_______________________________

End Report. Posts covered through 9:00pm ET 12/28/97

_______________________________

WE DELIVER - Get IOM In Fooldom Today delivered
straight to your e-mailbox every evening!

 

  home  | news  | specials  | strategies  | personal finance  | school  | help  

© Copyright 1995-2000, The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. This material is for personal use only. Republication and redissemination, including posting to news groups, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of The Motley Fool. The Motley Fool is a registered trademark and the "Fool" logo is a trademark of The Motley Fool, Inc. Contact Us