POST OF THE DAY
Building / Maintaining a Home
The Case for Residential Solar

 Related Links Discussion Boards This Post in Building / Maintaining a Home

By SanDiegoDave100
October 18, 2006

Posts selected for this feature rarely stand alone. They are usually a part of an ongoing thread, and are out of context when presented here. The material should be read in that light. How are these posts selected? Click here to find out and nominate a post yourself!

Subject: Solar Energy and the Tesla Motors Electric Car

Just thought you might want to see some numbers I ran on the case for solar energy and using such a system to provide electricity to an all-electric car.

My current home electrical usage is about 600 Kilo-watt-hours (Kwh) per month. This is pretty normal for a family of two in a single family house. San Diego Gas & Electricity (SDG&E) charge the following:
First 300 Kwh @ \$.1238/Kwh = \$37
Next 100 Kwh @ \$.1440/Kwh = \$14
Next 300 Kwh @ \$.2518/Kwh = \$50
Total = \$101

Now, my fuel bill for the car is:
1500 miles/month / 25 mpg = 60 gallons/month (about a fill-up a week)
60 gallons/month * \$3.00/gal = \$180/month

Total energy bill = \$101 + \$180 = \$280/month

Using conservative Tesla Motors numbers for power for their vehicle:
1500 miles/month @ .250 Kwh/mile = 375 Kwh

So, to power my household and provide power to recharge my electric vehicle, I need about 600 Kwh + 375 Kwh = 975 Kwh.

According to the "Clean Power Estimator" website: http://www.consumerenergycenter.org/renewables/estimator/index.html

An 8.0 KW system would provide an average of about 950 KWh over the course of a year. My zip code is 92024 (San Diego, CA) which is used to make the calculation.

At today's prices online at http://wholesalesolar.com/gridtie_prices_sanyo.html , I could purchase an 8.0 KW system for about \$55,500 before rebates. This is before any tax breaks. California offers a \$2.60/watt. This is described at the Cal Solar website:
http://www.californiasolarcenter.org/incentives.html . If the system is "owner-installed" then a 15% discount on the rebate reduces it to \$17,680. Thus, the system cost would be \$37,820 after rebates.

A home equity loan of \$37,800 at the current 6.5% rate would be only \$239/month. Therefore, with rebates, such a solar system would actually save me \$40/month in total fuel/energy costs. And I use NO OIL! I produce NO HYDROCARBON emissions.

When "NanoSolar" of Florida goes into production in 2007, I expect solar prices per watt to plummet by half.

Optimistically, I would hope that Tesla Motors could come out with a reasonable all-electric commuter vehicle within a couple of years.

Additionally, there are tax credit issues beyond the rebate. I admit I can't figure out the tax credits issue. It appears too complicated at this time for this simple analysis.

Finally, SDG&E tiered rates continue to increase beyond what I use or show above. The next 300 Kwh are at @ \$.26/Kwh and the following 300 after that are at \$.27/Kwh.

I did this analysis because my wife and I are planning on rebuilding our home in 2008 after our youngest daughter graduates from college. We will have grid-tie-in solar fully incorporated into the design.

Cordially,
Dave

Become a Complete Fool
Join the best community on the web! Becoming a full member of the Fool Community is easy, takes just a minute, and is very inexpensive.