By Dan Newman | September 6, 2012
Are you sitting down? Good, because here are three words that many say should scare investors: the fiscal cliff. Hopefully you didn't choke on your coffee -- or tea, or wine, depending on when and where you read this. Is the fiscal cliff that scary, though? Or is the view from the top worse than the fall?
If Congress doesn't act, what exactly will change?
These changes come from several different policies, making it more like a fiscal "staircase" than a cliff. While Congress may not find a solution to all the moving pieces, single parts could be maneuvered to avoid the crash-landing the Congressional Budget Office predicts.
If we tumble down this fiscal staircase, the CBO forecasts that next year's GDP would decline 0.5% and the unemployment rate would increase from the current 8.3% to 9.1%. For comparison, the CBO set up an alternative scenario where taxes remain where they are (except the payroll tax holiday) and budget cuts do not occur. In this scenario, instead of a GDP decline, we would see GDP rise 1.7% in 2013, and unemployment would improve to 8%.
However, in 2022, unemployment would sit at 5.3% in both scenarios; GDP growth with cuts would be 2.3%, while under the alternative it would be 2.1%; and the deficit is less than 1% of GDP after cuts, compared with almost 6% under the alternative. Also in 2022, federal debt held by the public could either edge toward 100% of GDP under the alternative or fall to less than 60% of GDP if we endure the cuts. While the immediate future looks bleak if no solution is found, in a decade it seems we would have endured a short-term setback.
But then, can even the CBO predict things a decade from now? Its report offers a bevy of factors that could prove its forecasts false, including faster economic growth, a worse-off Europe, and a surge in oil prices. The report also counts on more economic stimulus in early 2013 by the Fed.
No one wants to struggle economically or remove vital safety nets that others depend on to survive and attempt to prosper. The potential hits to important research, infrastructure, education, and security are also scary to think about. However, if we don't address rising debt now, we may bind future progress that would be saddled with higher debt service.
With an election on the way, it's unlikely anything will be resolved before November. This leaves two months of worrying, when it's likely nothing would be solved anyway. In the meantime, investors should review their own contingency plans. With the chance for dividends to be taxed at your income tax rate, it might be worthwhile to look at REITs, which already incur income tax rates for their dividends, or master limited partnerships, which require a more complicated review of the tax code.
To make up for the higher tax rates, REITs like Annaly Capital (NYSE - NLY) and Chimera Investment (NYSE - CIM) have yields above 10%, but these specific mortgage REITs are deeply exposed to interest rate risk. And the high beta, or volatility, of Chimera might be tough to stomach for traditional dividend investors. Timber REIT Weyerhaeuser (NYSE - WY) offers less of a dividend yield at 2.4%, but given no changes in policy, the market-beating capital gains of 34% this year would be taxed at a potentially more favorable rate of 20%.
Fool Jim Royal extolls the virtues of shopping center real-estate REIT Retail Opportunity Investment (Nasdaq - ROIC), which offers a yield slightly more than 4.4% and the capital-gains prospect of turning from a small cap into a mid-cap. MLP and pipeline operator Plains All American (NYSE - PAA) nets investors an almost 5% yield and has at least doubled the market's returns over the past one-year, five-year, and 10-year periods.
* This is a FREE service from The Motley Fool. Credit card is NOT required.
By submitting your email address, you consent to us keeping you informed about updates to our website and about other products and services that we think might interest you. You can unsubscribe at any time. Please read our Privacy Statement and Terms & Conditions.
©1995-2013 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Legal Information