What's in a Number?

Recs

0

By any chance are there 599 Rick Wagoners collecting paychecks as General Motors' (NYSE: GM) chief executive? Maybe that would help explain the company's precarious financial condition.

But, no. There's just one, and he offered in early December to cut his 2009 salary to $1 as part of an automaker rescue.

Sounds good. Since Wagoner's company is seeking a huge amount of financial help from the people of America, whacking his paycheck from $2.2 million to a single greenback seems like the least this man can do.

But is it more than a gesture? Numbers aren't always what they seem on Wall Street, and investors need to dig deeper to match words with reality.

For instance, even after a big drop last month, Berkshire Hathaway's (NYSE: BRK-A) (NYSE: BRK-B) A shares were still going for $75,000 at their lows. But as Fool Rich Duprey pointed out, that big number doesn't mean the shares are overpriced. The same goes for penny stocks, which might be cheap for a reason.

Now, it appears GM has gotten $9.4 billion from the federal government. And let's consider Wagoner's total 2007 compensation of $15.7 million, according to Reuters. It's less than Ford's (NYSE: F) Alan Mulally's compensation, but is it chicken feed in the big picture?

Wagoner's total compensation works out to roughly 0.17% of the $9.4 billion -- just a sixth of a percent. Admittedly, cutting $2 million or more from that total might make legislators and the general public feel better about bailing them out. But in the grand scheme of things, whether or not GM pays millions to its executives won't make or break the company's much larger restructuring plans. (Now, if all 599 of those Wagoners we were wondering about gave up their 2007 compensation, the company could've skipped the government money altogether.)

This is admittedly just one small piece of the numbers jumble involved in the automakers' financial predicament, but it shows how we can't stop at the surface when judging where to put our money.

Knowledge is power. Aspiring investors of the future need to know, for instance, about the wealth of information that companies put in readily available proxy statements and SEC filings. "Wow"-ing at the bosses' salaries can be the first step to becoming an active and informed shareholder, and a savvy steward of your own money.

To that end, please visit our Foolanthropy page and join The Motley Fool in lending a hand to teachers getting their students up to speed in financial literacy.

Further Foolishness:

“Make Big Money With Options” Motley Fool CFO Ollen Douglass recently made over $100,000 buying options on 7 well known stocks. Now we’re committed to turning his small fortune into a massive one! And we want you to join us! Enter your email address to hear more:

Kris Eddy owns no shares of companies mentioned in this article. Berkshire Hathaway is a recommendation of both Motley Fool Inside Value and Motley Fool Stock Advisor. The Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway. The Fool's disclosure policy dances backward, in high heels.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 27, 2008, at 3:45 AM, valueandprice wrote:

    This is HORRIBLE logic. That means all the excesses of years past by CEO pay in other companies ballooning to 200+ times the average workers salary is okay... because they their collective compensation was but a fraction of the profits they produced? Say WHAT? You're a Fool writer??? Do you REALLY believe 1 CEO, 1 person, is such a game changer to an organization as to deserve even 1/6% of the profits? As if they're visionary leadership was the make or break for the companies profits? I believe CEOs are important, but success is a factor OUTSIDE the control of any one individual. Hey, when the economy is going well, yes, profits are bound to roll in. CEOs give themselves too much credit for the success. When things turn, it's always blamed on the economy (I can agree with that), and never the CEOs fault. See the assymetry? To subscibe to the idea that CEOs deserve 200+ times the average worker for profits largely outside their control? WHAT? I definitely wouldn't hire you as the CEO of my company.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 798362, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/2/2009 12:48:16 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

By The Motley Fool

Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

Foolanthropy 2009

Foolanthropy '09 is dedicated to spreading the spirit of volunteerism. We've 'adopted' a D.C. public charter school by making a Foolish donation and organizing volunteer efforts from Fool HQ. We encourage you to do the same -- at any worthy organization in your own community.

To learn more about our adopted school, or to make a donation, click here.

Related Tickers

12/2/2009 11:56 AM
BRK-A $100089.00 Down -361.00 -0.36%
Berkshire Hathaway… CAPS Rating: *****
BRK-B $3333.50 Down -18.80 -0.56%
Berkshire Hathaway… CAPS Rating: *****
F $8.95 Up +0.07 +0.79%
Ford Motor Company CAPS Rating: **
GM $0.75 Down +0.00 +0.00%
General Motors Cor… CAPS Rating: *

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Earnings Power Value: Earnings Power Value (EPV) is a valuation tool that was popularized by Bruce Greenwald, et al, in the book Value Investing: From Graham to Buffett and Beyond.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!