Track the companies that matter to you. It's FREE! Click one of these fan favorites to get started: Apple; Google; Ford.



Should the Tax Code Subsidize Families?

Raising children is an expensive undertaking, with some estimates putting the total cost of raising a child at $300,000 or more. But a controversial proposal that would give parents tax breaks at the expense of those who choose not to have children has sparked intense debate about the role of the tax laws in providing financial support to families with children.

In the following video, Dan Caplinger, The Motley Fool's director of investment planning, takes a critical look at the proposal. Dan notes that the argument in favor of the proposal is that raising kids involves extra expenses that non-parents don't have to pay, and so making non-parents who earn above the median household income pay more in taxes essentially makes economic prospects more even. Yet Dan points out that past attempts to provide tax subsidies to encourage certain activities hasn't always worked out well, noting the role of tax incentives in the savings and loan crisis of the late 1970s and 1980s. Even today, tax-favored vehicles have come under fire, with Kinder Morgan Energy Partners (NYSE: KMP  ) and similar master limited partnerships, Annaly Capital  (NYSE: NLY  ) and other real-estate investment trusts, and Prospect Capital (NASDAQ: PSEC  ) and its business development company peers being seen by some as tax-motivated enterprises that have resulted in overinvestment in their respective areas. Dan concludes that with tax incentives for families already in place, further moves would make the decision to have a family too economically motivated.

Take advantage of this little-known tax "loophole"
Recent tax increases have affected nearly every American taxpayer. But with the right planning, you can take steps to take control of your taxes and potentially even lower your tax bill. In our brand-new special report "The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!," you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to learn more.

Read/Post Comments (4) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 13, 2014, at 2:15 PM, desertrattwo wrote:

    The tax code should NOT subsidize families. Most children are accidental. That doesn't necessarily mean they are not wanted; however, too many people have more children than they can afford simply because they don't understand "planned parenthood." That behavior is irresponsible and should not be rewarded with tax subsidies. Two children per family should be the limit in deductions for children, with "special allowances" for adoptions. In addition, the world is already overcrowded and farmland to grow crops and raise animals to feed everyone is disappearing.

  • Report this Comment On April 14, 2014, at 2:30 AM, markt wrote:

    THE TAX CODE should NOT punish a person whether they HAVE children or DON'T. It should ALSO NOT punish you whether you are

    MARRIED or not. WHAT PART of

    FAIR TAX LAW is missing from the politicians vocabulary?

  • Report this Comment On April 14, 2014, at 9:09 AM, GenYfool wrote:

    It shouldn't promote single parent households, that's for sure. That is the single largest common factor in poverty in the US. A huge percentage of "homeless" people are single mothers and their children.

    That factor alone (single parenthood) causes so many problems down the road that it should be discouraged by the tax law and any other means Constitutionally allowable.

  • Report this Comment On April 14, 2014, at 12:16 PM, taxprogirl wrote:

    I don't have a problem with a small break such as the child tax credit. I thing that the Earned Income Credit should be eliminated.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2913373, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/2/2015 10:36:11 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Dan Caplinger

Dan Caplinger has been a contract writer for the Motley Fool since 2006. As the Fool's Director of Investment Planning, Dan oversees much of the personal-finance and investment-planning content published daily on With a background as an estate-planning attorney and independent financial consultant, Dan's articles are based on more than 20 years of experience from all angles of the financial world.

Today's Market

updated 1 hour ago Sponsored by:
DOW 16,351.38 293.03 1.82%
S&P 500 1,948.86 35.01 1.83%
NASD 4,749.98 113.87 2.46%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

12/31/1969 7:00 PM
KMP $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Kinder Morgan Ener… CAPS Rating: *****
NLY $10.14 Up +0.07 +0.70%
Annaly Capital Man… CAPS Rating: ****
PSEC $7.57 Up +0.08 +1.07%
Prospect Capital C… CAPS Rating: ****