Gold and silver miner Hecla Mining Company (HL) had a blowout year production wise in 2016. Although most of the company's operating mines performed decently, the significant improvement was really the result of just one mining asset. So the outlook for 2017 is good, but investors shouldn't go into 2017 expecting production growth on par with 2016. Here's what you need to know...  

Holy cow!

If you just look at the top-line numbers, Hecla Mining's production in 2016 was nothing short of impressive. Year over year, silver production increased 48%, a huge gain over 2015's production levels. And Gold production increased an impressive 24%.  

An image of a Hecla Mining employee examining a rock.

Image source: Hecla Mining Company.   

However, there's a lot more to those number than meets the eye. For example, silver production was up around 9% at Hecla's Greens Creek mine, with gold production falling a touch over 10%. Silver production increased a notable 18% (or so) at Lucky Friday. Casa Berardi, meanwhile, saw gold and silver production leap around 14% each in 2016. On the whole, those are pretty good numbers and investors should be generally pleased with the operating performance of the mines.

But alone that trio of mines can't explain the 46% gain in silver production or the 24% leap in gold. The big jump came from Hecla's San Sebastian mine in Mexico. San Sebastian began mining ore in December of 2015, so 2016 was its first full year of production for Hecla. Which helps explain why silver production at the mine increased an incredible 5,000%, with gold production ramping up a massive 3,800%.    

Three bar charts showing the increase in Hecla Minings gold, silver, and silver equivalent ounce production in 2016.

Hecla put up big numbers in 2016... Image source: Hecla Mining    

So when you look at Helca's record setting year, you need to understand that it was a new mine coming on line that really drove production growth.  

Temper your enthusiasm

Which is why investors can't go into 2017 expecing anything like a repeat despite CEO Phillips Baker's comment that, "Looking to 2017, we estimate our silver equivalent production will be higher than the record we set in 2016, benefiting from higher metals prices and strong performance from our mines." In fact, the production growth difference between the two years should be pretty material.  

For example, Hecla is currently calling for 2017 silver production to come in between 14.0 and 15.5 million ounces. Gold production is expected to be in the range of 230,000 to 250,000 ounces. At the high end of each estimate, that will actually represent a nearly 10% decline in silver production and a modest 7% or so increase in gold. The silver number is vastly different from 2016, though gold's increase is lower, but not bad.  

A table showing only modest expected production growth in 2017 for Helca Mining.

Hecla Mining's production estimates for 2017.  Image source: Hecla Mining Company. 

That said, Hecla's low-end estimate for silver would mean a nearly 20% decline in silver production. For gold the low-end estimate amounts to a roughly 1.5% production drop. Sure, 2017 might be another record year for Hecla production wise (heavily weighted toward gold), but it won't be a banner year like 2016. And if production comes up at the low end of the company's projections, there might not be any growth at all for silver or gold. While Hecla is working on the Rock Creek and Montanore mines, they are still in the permitting phase of development -- a long way from production.    

A good 2017, but not great

The ramp up of the San Sebastian mine in Mexico was a huge boon to Hecla Mining's business in 2016. And it couldn't have come at a better time, with gold and silver prices moving higher just as the mine's production started to ramp up. This combination turned 2016 into a gangbuster year for Hecla. While the company is still working on growth projects, don't look for 2017 to match the production improvements seen last year. Incremental increases are all you should be expecting.