The Steal, er, Deal of the Year

The $2.15 billion acquisition of Lehman Brothers' (OTC: LEHM.Q) investment management division by Bain Capital and Hellman & Friedman isn't the deal of the year (that would probably be Barclays' (NYSE: BCS  ) purchase of Lehman's North American broker-dealer business) ... but it's close.

The deal includes the crown jewel of the division, Neuberger Berman, and concludes a process that began weeks ago, as Lehman was struggling to raise capital. Bidders originally included other buyout heavyweights, such as KKR and the Blackstone Group (NYSE: BX  ) .

 $2.15 billion … peanuts, I tell you
Let's put that number in perspective:

  • Before Lehman's Sept. 15 bankruptcy filing, another buyout firm, the Carlyle Group, was willing to buy the investment management unit for $7 billion and give Lehman the option to buy it back.
  • Lehman Brothers paid $3.1 billion for Neuberger Berman alone in 2003. At the time, Neuberger Berman had $64 billion in assets under management (AUM). Since then, Neuberger Berman has more than doubled its AUM to $130 billion. The total for the investment management division is $230 billion.
  • If those first two weren't clear enough, here's another way of looking at it: If you were to pay $2.15 billion for Neuberger Berman alone, you'd be getting a great franchise at a good price -- less than 1.7% of AUM. That's what these buyers are doing, and they're getting all the other parts of investment management, which represent $100 billion in AUM, thrown in for free.

For reference, BlackRock (NYSE: BLK  ) , another marquee asset manager, has a current market value representing 1.8% of its AUM. BlackRock is partly owned by Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER  ) . Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation Legg Mason (NYSE: LM  ) is probably a better comparable for Neuberger, but it is currently trading at a distressed valuation of barely 0.6% of AUM.

Bain and Hellman & Friedman got a fantastic price, and that's a good thing (for them, not for Lehman creditors), because they won't be able to count on leverage to juice their returns; the acquisition is a cash transaction.

More bailout Foolishness:

In the current environment, the only safety is a great franchise protected by a bulletproof balance sheet. Those are the sort of businesses Philip Durell and his team look for at The Motley Fool's Inside Value investing service. You can find out their most recent picks by taking a 30-day free trial today.

Alex Dumortier, CFA, has no beneficial interest in any of the companies mentioned in this article. Legg Mason is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. The Fool owns shares of Legg Mason. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (2) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 30, 2008, at 11:04 PM, Clint35 wrote:

    Well now we know how Lehman got themselves in such a jam and went under. Their managers were idiots. They had the chance to sell an investment management unit for $7B plus the option to buy it back later. And they turned it down!!!? What a bunch of morons! Then later they ended up selling it anyway, at $2.15B. I think I'm gonna throw up! Such stupidity involving so much money; it makes me sick. How do these people get their jobs? But hey, what do I know. $7B might not have saved the company anyway.

  • Report this Comment On October 03, 2008, at 7:11 PM, Ozcutty wrote:

    Lehman paid 2.3bl for $64 b AUM in 2003? looks like they overpayed!

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 741359, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/29/2014 4:55:15 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Apple's next smart device (warning, it may shock you

Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early-in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!


Advertisement