Wells Fargo Doubles Down

Recs

2

Motley Fool Stock Advisor

Since 2002, David and Tom Gardner have returned 28.89% while the S&P 500 returned -11.53%. Try Stock Advisor free for 30 days.

Stock Advisor

Shares of Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) fell yesterday. Why? It raised capital. Shares of Ambac Financial (NYSE: ABK) fell 24% yesterday. Why? It needs more capital. Man, financial firms can't do anything right these days.

Wells Fargo raised $11 billion in fresh equity yesterday by issuing common stock, down from the $20 billion it planned on raising to help usher in its pending acquisition of Wachovia (NYSE: WB).

But, wait, does Wells really need the money? Didn't it just get $25 billion from the Treasury? And wasn't Chairman Richard Kovacevich opposed to taking those funds? Yep. That's where things get interesting.

You can hypothesize all sorts of reasons why the market took raising $11 billion as bad news. One, a flustered Kovacevich might use the funds to pay back some of the Treasury's injection, which would sort of remove it from the bailout crowd. That could be a good thing; freeing Wells Fargo from the stigma that accompanies accepting government funds. But you could also take it as the company getting too cocky with its relative health. It's sort of like ignoring your doctors when they say you need help … probably not a good idea in general.

Another issue with Wells Fargo raising $11 billion: It looks like the $20 billion it had originally planned on raising may have been out of its grasp. Given its market cap of less than $100 billion, and with shares under fire, issuing gobs of stock and hoping investors bite may have proved easier said than done. If scraping up cash by selling new shares were a piece of cake, Wells could always issue the remaining $9 billion down the road if and when markets mellow out. That it seems unable to at present just adds a layer of uncertainty to things.  

A third fear is that Wells Fargo has realized how dire things are, and that it needs the Treasury's $25 billion and another $11 billion just to stay comfortably capitalized. If true, that's a scary realization for companies like Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS), State Street (NYSE: STT) and Citigroup (NYSE: C). It might signal that the market has deteriorated so greatly that the Treasury's injection may not be enough to keep things in check.

For related Foolishness:

Follow along with the Global Gains team as they travel to key business centers in China to uncover the very best investing opportunities! Sign up here to receive their FREE dispatches from the road.

Fool contributor Morgan Housel doesn't own shares in any of the companies mentioned in this article. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 07, 2008, at 3:18 PM, ADifferentView wrote:

    What about looking at the 11 billion raised as part of the price tag for buying Wachovia. Obviosly they needed capital and now that "they" are Wells the need for capital hasn't changed.

  • Report this Comment On November 07, 2008, at 3:26 PM, ADifferentView wrote:

    "The preferred stock pay cumulative dividends of 5% a year for the first five years and 9% annually thereafter. As part of the deal, the Treasury also received warrants to purchase 110.26 million shares of Wells Fargo's common stock at $34.01 a share." Under these terms about the only thing you can do is write 5 year auto loans or credit card loans, the cost of funds is too high to tie it up in motrgages paying 6% beyond the intial five years.

  • Report this Comment On November 09, 2008, at 2:22 AM, dividendgrowth wrote:

    Good comments. WB must have tons of stinking assets under its cover, and WFC needs more money just to be safe. Besides, WFC is the only bank to trade near last year's levels. It would be stupid for them not to raise more money.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 772054, ~/articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/6/2009 12:47:47 AM

Keep Reading:

“Wells Fargo Doubles Down”

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

What Fools Are Saying

Get involved! »

Most Recent

Jul 2 at 4:22 PM

Market Summary

DJIA 8,280.74 -223.32 -2.63%
S&P 500 896.42 -26.91 -2.91%
NASD 1,796.52 +0.00 +0.00%
Sponsored by:

Related Tickers

Wells Fargo & Company

CAPS Rating 3/5 Stars

$23.08

-1.06 (-4.39%)

Outperform3606

Underperform531

Rate This Stock