Recs

3

Navios Maritime's Dividends May Not Last Forever

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Whether you're a beginning investor or a near-retiree, the importance of purchasing stocks that pay dividends cannot be overstated. Not only do companies that have quarterly or annual payouts provide you with a steady stream of income, they also have the potential for capital appreciation. Simply put, dividend stocks can give your portfolio what almost no other investment can -- both income and growth.

At The Motley Fool, we're avid fans of dividends -- and not just because we like that steady stream of cash. Studies have shown that from 1972 to 2006, stocks in the S&P 500 that don't pay dividends have earned an average annual return of 4.1%; dividend stocks, however, have averaged a whopping 10.1% per year. That is an incredible difference -- one that you'd be crazy to not take advantage of!

But investing in dividends can be dangerous -- companies can cut, slash, or suspend dividends at any time, often without notice. Fortunately, there are several warnings signs that may alert you, and these red flags could be the crucial factor in determining whether a company is likely to continue paying its dividend. Today, let's drill beneath the surface and check out Navios Maritime Holdings (NYSE: NM  ) .

What's on the surface?
Navios Maritime Holdings, which operates in the marine industry, currently pays a dividend of 4.51%. That's certainly nothing to sneeze at, as the average dividend payer in the S&P 500, in 2009, sported a yield of 2%.

But what's more important than the dividend itself is Navios Maritime Holdings' ability to keep that cash rolling. The first thing to look at is the company's reported dividends versus its reported earnings. If you happen to see dividend payments that are growing faster than earnings per share, it may be an initial signal that something just isn't right. Check out the graph below for details of the past five years:

anImage

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

Clearly, there doesn't seem to be a problem here. Navios Maritime Holdings has been able to boost its earnings at an adequate pace and keep its dividends in check at the same time.

The more secure, the better
One of the most common metrics that investors use to judge the safety of a dividend is the payout ratio. This number tells you what percentage of net income is paid out to investors in the form of a dividend. Normally, anything above 50% is cause to look a bit further. According to the most recent data, Navios Maritime Holdings' payout ratio is 23.24%. It's obvious that, at least on the surface, there aren't any problems with Navios Maritime Holdings generating enough income to support that nice dividend of 4.51%.

More important than checking out the payout ratio may be simply taking a peek at Navios Maritime Holdings' cash flow. Free cash flow -- all the cash left over after subtracting out capital expenditures -- is used by firms to make acquisitions, develop new products, and of course, pay dividends! We can use a simple metric called the cash flow coverage ratio, which is cash flow per share divided by dividends per share. Normally, anything above 1.2 should make you feel comfortable; anything less, and you may have a problem on your hands. Navios Maritime Holdings' coverage ratio is -30.49, -- which isn't enough to make me feel comfortable as an investor. There could be a number of reasons the number is so low -- maybe it's typical for the industry, maybe there's a significant amount of debt coming due, or maybe Navios Maritime Holdings is simply less than stellar at managing its assets.

Either way, it's always beneficial to compare an investment with its most immediate competitors, so in the chart below, I've included the above metrics with those of Navios Maritime Holdings' closest competitors. In addition, I've included the five-year dividend growth rate, which is also a very important indicator. If Navios Maritime Holdings can illustrate that it's grown dividends over the past five years, then there's a good chance that it will continue to put shareholders first in the future. Check out how Navios Maritime Holdings stacks up below:

Company

Dividend

Yield

Payout

Ratio

Coverage Ratio

Navios Maritime Holdings

4.51%

23.24%

(30.49)

Paragon Shipping (NYSE: PRGN )

5.57%

21.22%

0.39

Star Bulk Carriers (Nasdaq: SBLK  )

7.07%

N/M

7.18

Safe Bulkers (NYSE: SB  )

7.76%

19.77%

2.02

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

The Foolish bottom line
Only you can decide what numbers you're comfortable with in the end; sometimes a higher yield and a higher reward mean additional risk. However, in this situation, Navios Maritime Holdings' payout ratio seems to be above the peer average, which means if you're a prudent investor, you may want to look elsewhere for the most secure payment possible (although a 23% payout ratio is certainly quite comforting). The bottom line, however, is to make sure that with anything -- whether it be a dividend, a share repurchase, or an ordinary earnings report -- you do your own due diligence. Looking at all of the numbers in the best context possible is just the best place to start.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Jordan DiPietro owns no shares. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On August 27, 2010, at 6:50 PM, DEALWITHTHEDAY wrote:

    Seeking Alpha call transcript section.

    Please turn to slide 11. Our 31.3% interest in Navios Partners has a market value of about $225 million. Navios Partners provides a significant cash distribution to Navios Holdings. For 2010 we received about $30 million in distributions from Partners. We anticipate, based on current run rate, receiving about $21.9 million in distributions during 2010, which will fund about 90% of Navios Maritime Holdings dividends to our shareholders.

  • Report this Comment On August 29, 2010, at 10:31 AM, psl8er wrote:

    So why did Navios Holdings have to bail out its acquisition company whcih ran short of cash to complete its acquisitions? Be very careful of any group that moves cash between the various companies and has numerous inter company debt and operating arrangements.The move into tankers looks very ill timed.

  • Report this Comment On August 30, 2010, at 3:16 PM, Hohum777 wrote:

    psl8er,

    Navios Maritime Acquisitions (NNA) was a SPAC at the time, so it couldn't complete the deal. NM had to acquire the vessels with the assumption that NNA shareholders would approve the initial assets.

    Also, since Navios Maritime Holdings (NM) has a significant stake in NNA, their financial info has to be consolidated per financial regulations.

    Once NNA completes the acquisition of the VLCC tankers and a steady revenue stream starts, then a dividend will likely follow, similar to NMM.

  • Report this Comment On September 02, 2010, at 9:56 AM, shippingscam wrote:

    IMO the author, Mr. Barker, is correct to be skeptical. Some of you, have no clue what Greek shipping is all about. I was there, worked for them, got sick to my stomach and left. These companies are intricate schemes to support a lavish life style. American investors havce no clue. It is so complicated. Just a few examples: each time the shipowner wants to buy anopther expensive present for their girlfriend or boyfriend they can arrange for another transaction, another time charter, another accident or machine failure and get their kickbacks. Specific example: arrange with the captain that the generator broke down, get a cheap one at some port for replacement and actually sell the original one that works get the money but charge it as loss to the investors.

    The SEC too had no clue. They should not have allowed Greek shipping to list and rip off American naive investors. The reason that these Greeks wanted to get listed, something that they avoided for a long time, is that the banks now know all their tricks and they want co-management. If you, American investors, get a glimpse of the lavish lifestyle these people enjoy with your money you will get sick.

    My girlfriend was working for a Greek company and her boss asked her to sleep with a banker and convince him to issue a loan. She quit and she was not able to get another job in this industry. These are the typical methods these people use. The banks are now aware and they ahve put in place safeguards.

    Now, as far as the NM transcation to the other company that was a criminal act and I wonder why the SEC is not investigating it. That ship hardly worths 60 Million today but it was sold for 110 Million because it has a time charter. Now, this is important, it should be investigated very carefully, what these long term charters are, their terms. Who has signed for them and whether there are allowances for re-negotioation in them or the shippers invoking some clause and stop paying. Actually, it should be investigated whether behind such long term contracts also hides some pyramid scheme Ponzi style.

    I would also like note that there are some very legitimate shipowners in Greece, a few listed, and some private. But anyone how knows anything about shipping knows that with 100% financing in a volatile market, gains from operating ships average to zero in the longer term, this has been proven. Shipping in the longer term can only be profitable with accurate timing for purchase and sales of ships, something that is very difficult to do. Thus, the growth, if any, is either due to excesive risks, or clever accounting and this type of business should not be publicly listed.

    Thank you for your attention.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1283601, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/24/2012 11:37:12 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 2 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,529.75 33.60 0.27%
S&P 500 1,320.68 1.82 0.14%
NASD 2,839.38 -10.74 -0.38%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/24/2012 4:02 PM
SB $6.52 Up +0.06 +0.93%
Safe Bulkers CAPS Rating: ****
SBLK $0.73 Down -0.02 -3.15%
Star Bulk Carriers CAPS Rating: ****
NM $3.34 Down -0.02 -0.60%
Navios Maritime Ho… CAPS Rating: *****
PRGN $0.58 Up +0.00 +0.63%
Paragon Shipping I… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement