Editor's note: A previous version of this article used erroneous expense data from a third-party source and made inferences based on that incorrect data. The Fool regrets the error.
Exchange-traded funds give investors a great way to invest in the widest possible array of investments available. But as with any other investment, you have to be careful not to pay too much for the privilege of owning ETF shares. Unfortunately, the annual expenses of some ETFs make it a lot harder to earn the profits you need in order to reach your financial goals. That raises a key question: Are high-cost ETFs ever justified?
The conundrum of ETF costs
Mutual fund investors have long understood the impact of fees and costs on their total return. It's as simple as this: Every dollar that goes to pay a fund manager or reimburse the costs a fund incurs is a dollar that doesn't come back to you when you cash in your shares. In a major bull market, it's easy to overlook the downward-pulling effect of those costs, but when good returns are hard to come by -- as they have been for quite a while now -- it's much clearer that you can't afford to waste any of your hard-earned investment gains.
What makes high fees for ETFs even more egregious is that unlike mutual funds, most ETFs passively follow indexes rather than making active investment decisions. With mutual funds, you can at least feel like your money is going to pay investment professionals to make smart decisions about which stocks are likely to outperform their peers. But with index ETFs, it's not always clear how you're getting your money's worth -- or even what you're paying for.
For instance, here's a list of the five most expensive ETFs, according to Morningstar:
|
ETF |
Expense Ratio |
|---|---|
|
Active Bear ETF |
1.85% |
| Dent Tactical ETF | 1.50% |
| Mars Hill Global Relative Value | 1.49% |
| Meidell Tactical Advantage | 1.35% |
|
Peritus High Yield |
1.35% |
Source: AdvisorShares.
At least from this list, you can see that investors are hungry for ETFs that will take a stand in their respective sectors. For instance, the Active Bear ETF, for which Motley Fool Alpha advisor John Del Vecchio acts as a portfolio manager, seems tailor-made for the current market environment, with short positions in stocks such as Ebix
Similarly, Dent Tactical takes an active view of investing. But with a current allocation of just 16% to inflation-protected bond ETF iShares Barclays TIPS
With Peritus High Yield, however, investors get what amounts to full active management in an asset class that's hard to replicate on your own. Although passive junk bond ETFs exist, they track indexes that include a lot of bonds that smart investors avoid. Sure, it's tough to overcome an extra percentage point of expenses, but if Peritus can manage to steer clear of a default that the junk bond indexes fall into, then it can quickly pay for itself.
Can you do it yourself and save?
The question to ask about any ETF with high fees is whether you can replicate the strategy it uses while paying less to do it. If an ETF gives you access to an asset class that's hard to add to your portfolio on your own, then it might be worth paying a bit more for the privilege. Otherwise, sticking with low-cost ETFs may not be as exciting as a more active strategy, but over the long haul, you're likely to get much better results with them.
If you'd like to see some lower-cost fund choices, check out the Motley Fool's free special report on ETFs. We've found three ETFs you should know about.
