5 Things You Need to Know About the Bitcoin ETF

Yesterday, the Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust filed a registration statement with the SEC to offer an exchange-traded fund that if approved will give mainstream investors easier access to the controversial cyber-currency. But even if the ETF gets regulatory approval, you shouldn't invest before you know all the risks involved.

Fortunately, one of the hallmarks of U.S. securities law is that companies and investment vehicles seeking to make public offerings of shares have to disclose the risks involved in their ventures. So let's take a look at the highlights of the Winklevoss ETF's registration statement to uncover some of the most important things to keep in mind if you're planning to invest.

1. "Bitcoins are controllable only by the possessor of both the unique public and private keys relating to the local or online digital wallet in which the Bitcoins are held, which wallet's public key or address is reflected in the Bitcoin Network's public Blockchain... . To the extent such private keys are lost, destroyed or otherwise compromised, the Trust will be unable to access the related Bitcoins and such private keys will not be capable of being restored by the Bitcoin Network."

One of the primary worries that would-be Bitcoin users have about digital currency is that its existence relies on computer networks beyond their control. By contrast, existing currency and commodity ETFs can in many cases point to actual physical assets. SPDR Gold Trust (NYSEMKT: GLD  ) and iShares Silver Trust (NYSEMKT: SLV  ) , for instance, publish lists of physical bullion bars to support the underlying value of their shares. Currency ETFs CurrencyShares Canadian Dollar (NYSEMKT: FXC  ) and CurrencyShares Japanese Yen (NYSEMKT: FXY  ) usually turn to short-term investments denominated in their respective currencies. 

Hacking attacks in the past have led to theft and caused overall losses in Bitcoin-investor confidence, causing temporary price drops. With such a huge concentration of Bitcoins, the ETF would not only have to protect against existing threats but anticipate future ones before they occurred in order to avoid putting investors' funds at risk.

2. "A decline in the popularity or acceptance of the Bitcoin Network would harm the price of the Shares."

Prices of Bitcoins have posted amazing gains since they first came out, but the gains have come with intense volatility. Yet so far, the actual use of Bitcoins has been fairly limited, with most people perceiving the network's anonymity as being of greatest use for illicit activity. Until mainstream uses of Bitcoins start appearing, the digital currency's growth will remain limited.

3. "If a malicious actor or botnet obtains control in excess of 50 percent of the processing power active on the Bitcoin Network, such actor or botnet could manipulate the source code of the Bitcoin Network or the Blockchain in a manner that adversely affects an investment in the Shares or the ability of the Trust to operate."

The value of Bitcoins relies on arguably the most substantial counterparty risk existent: that the Bitcoin Network on which the ETF will rely can and will defend itself from attacks. If the network fails to protect itself, then the registration statement notes that the ETF might not even be able to function, let alone retain its value.

4. "As the Sponsor and its management have no history of operating an investment vehicle like the Trust, their experience may be inadequate or unsuitable to manage the Trust."

The Winklevosses reached notoriety due to their connection with what later became Facebook, although they've also heavily invested in Bitcoins. Yet the S-1 filing clearly states that the entity that acts as the ETF sponsor, which is wholly owned by Winklevoss Capital Management, has no ETF experience. Especially in dealing with the challenges of holding an asset that no exchange-traded product has held before, investors shouldn't let name recognition take the place of true expertise in dealing with the ins and outs of investment vehicles.

5. "It may be illegal now, or in the future, to acquire, own, hold, sell or use Bitcoins in one or more countries, and ownership of, holding or trading in Shares may also be considered illegal and subject to sanction."

It's not common for investors to have to worry about the current legality of the assets in which they invest. The SEC likely wouldn't approve the ETF for trading if it thought that the ETF was breaking the law simply by owning Bitcoins, but with the currency attracting large amounts of regulatory scrutiny from those concerned about its more questionable uses, you can't rule out the possibility of government action rendering Bitcoins unusable for ordinary mainstream transactions.

Think twice before you buy
The Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust faces an uphill battle to gain approval from the SEC to list, given all these risks. But one of the benefits of the IPO regulatory process is that investors get to see light shed on all the prospective investments made available to them. If the SEC eventually approves the offering, buyers of a Bitcoin ETF will have only themselves to blame if anything goes wrong in the future.

Want an ETF you can really count on? To learn more about a few ETFs that have great promise for delivering profits to shareholders, check out The Motley Fool's special free report "3 ETFs Set to Soar." Just click here to access it now.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (3)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 03, 2013, at 12:14 PM, jenkstom wrote:

    On number one, the comment has nothing to do with the stated risk. The risk is that the funds are controlled by a private key, and loss of that key means that the funds are lost as well. This is not referring to "computer networks" in any way, it is a basic aspect of asymmetric cryptography, which is purely a math problem. (A computer network risk would be something along the lines of being unable to submit a transaction to the network for some reason.)

    Put a copy of your private keys (sometimes called a "wallet") in a safety deposit box or some other place you consider to be safe. Or multiple places. There are many schemes supported by the bitcoin protocol to mitigate this risk factor including being able to split the private key among multiple parties and have a minimum number of them decide to submit a transaction (spend funds).

    Number 3 admits that there is risk, but the author does a disservice by refusing to analyze that risk in any way. What would it take to achieve a 50% attack? What are the consequences?

    The network hash rate is approaching 200 trillion hashes PER SECOND. That is astronomical, and it is increasing exponentially with millions of dollars of custom-designed and dedicated hardware being added to the network. It is not going to decrease unless bitcoins become nearly valueless.

    What is the consequence of a 50% attack? Someone could possibly unspend a transaction. That is a big issue, yes, but it doesn't affect your bitcoins, only their value. And there are many other mechanisms in place to prevent this. The concept of peer-to-peer becomes extremely important here. If the majority of users decide not to trust a transaction, it will not get trusted. Even if a majority of computing power is in the hands of a malicious attacker.

    A better guide would be to compare the cost of a 50% attack against the value of any given transaction. If the transaction exceeds that value, it should probably be split up into smaller transactions. Again, this is just a technical issue with the network, it is not a weakness per se.

    None of the rest of these issues are specific to bitcoin. Any company can have inexperienced management, any stock or other commodity can lose value at any time and it can also become illegal.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 2520721, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/29/2014 12:28:07 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement