3 Reasons Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) Could Fall

In short, an improving economy tends to dampen investor interest in gold. This will put further downward pressure on the price of gold, hurting gold miners like Silver Wheaton, Barrick Gold, Goldcorp, and Newmont Mining on the bottom line. That will in turn drive the price of Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF further down.

Aug 28, 2014 at 4:19PM

Gold mining is expensive and hard, and gold miners have zero pricing power.

A week or so ago, I wrote an article that listed three reasons to buy Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF (NYSEMKT:GDX). It's important to understand that gold went on an unprecedented bull run from the early 2000s through late 2011, but it has largely been in decline since. Further, gold has historically been an underperforming asset as compared to the stock market. And while the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF is made up of stocks, the companies are all in the gold mining business, and this group tends to move with the price of gold. 

With that said, here are three reasons the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF could fall. Should you consider limiting your exposure to gold and gold miners? Let's take a closer look. 

1. Gold has historically underperformed stocks as an asset class 
Here's how the stock market (as measured by the S&P 500) has fared against gold over the past 25 years:

Gold Price in US Dollars Chart

Gold Price in US Dollars data by YCharts.

The story is much the same when you go back even further in time. The reason has little do with gold being a "bad" investment so much as its limited demand for industrial and consumer goods. The reality is, much of gold's bull run over the past decade was a product of speculative demand as more people invested in gold out of fear of a currency collapse. 

In many ways, this is the very definition of a "bubble," where the price of gold was not sustained by actual demand, but speculation. Therein lies the risk for investors. How do you accurately predict that the price of gold will rebound in a measurable way? You can't with any level of accuracy when the source of demand is so hard to measure. 

2. A strengthening economy could further reduce speculation in gold 
While this isn't guaranteed -- see my comments above about the difficulty in predicting what gold prices will do -- it seems likely. It was recently reported that median American household annual income has increased roughly $2,000 from 2011. Yes, median income levels are still down from their peak -- and even down from 2000 -- but this is a sign that more families are doing better.

This is the kind of trend that will lead to less uncertainty about the economy. Less uncertainty will lead to less interest in hedging against the collapse of the currency. The result? Gold likely continues to underperform, and gold miners -- which depend on gold being expensive and in demand to make money -- could see their stocks fall further as it gets harder to make money.

This chart illustrates how speculative demand for gold -- measured by trading activity in SPDR Gold Shares (NYSEMKT:GLD) -- has steadily declined since gold prices peaked in 2011:

GLD 30-Day Average Daily Volume Chart

GLD 30-Day Average Daily Volume data by YCharts.

This is a relatively good measure of speculative activity in gold versus industrial demand, and the trend is pretty clear. 

3. Gold mining is a really, really hard business to make money at 
As I wrote last time, more than 40% of the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF is allocated to Goldcorp (NYSE:GG)Barrick Gold (NYSE:ABX)Newmont Mining (NYSE:NEM), and Silver Wheaton (NYSE:SLW). Here's how these companies have performed -- measured by net income -- in recent years:

GG Net Income (TTM) Chart

GG Net Income (TTM) data by YCharts.

In short, that's a lot of red ink. Over the past 12 months, these four companies have combined to lose $4.4 billion, on $13 billion in revenues. That's with U.S. gold prices still well over $1,200 per ounce. 

Bet on businesses with pricing power instead
The biggest risk with gold miners (and gold itself) is how incredibly difficult it is to predict what the price of gold will do. A much smarter long-term investing strategy is to find businesses that have real competitive advantages versus businesses tethered to a highly volatile commodity, like gold, which price seems to be driven more by sheer speculation rather than industrial use. 

I'm not saying it's impossible to make money with gold, or gold miners. What I am saying is it's very difficult to accurately predict gold's value outperforming the stock market in the long term, especially when much of gold's price is driven by speculation on the health of the broader economy. This will further challenge gold miners' ability to make profits, hurting their share prices, and the price of the Market Vectors Gold Miners ETF. 

Maybe I'm too optimistic, but I think American businesses and the global economy are a better bet for long-term investors. 

Here's the best bet on America's future, and it could cut your tax bill
Record American oil and natural gas production is changing the lives of millions. What you probably haven't heard is that the IRS is encouraging investors to support our growing energy renaissance, with a tax loophole to invest in some of America's greatest energy companies. Take advantage of this profitable opportunity by grabbing your brand-new special report, "The IRS Is Daring You to Make This Investment Now!," and you'll learn about the simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule. Don't miss out on advice that could help you cut taxes for decades to come. Click here to learn more.

Jason Hall has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of Silver Wheaton (USA). Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

4 in 5 Americans Are Ignoring Buffett's Warning

Don't be one of them.

Jun 12, 2015 at 5:01PM

Admitting fear is difficult.

So you can imagine how shocked I was to find out Warren Buffett recently told a select number of investors about the cutting-edge technology that's keeping him awake at night.

This past May, The Motley Fool sent 8 of its best stock analysts to Omaha, Nebraska to attend the Berkshire Hathaway annual shareholder meeting. CEO Warren Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger fielded questions for nearly 6 hours.
The catch was: Attendees weren't allowed to record any of it. No audio. No video. 

Our team of analysts wrote down every single word Buffett and Munger uttered. Over 16,000 words. But only two words stood out to me as I read the detailed transcript of the event: "Real threat."

That's how Buffett responded when asked about this emerging market that is already expected to be worth more than $2 trillion in the U.S. alone. Google has already put some of its best engineers behind the technology powering this trend. 

The amazing thing is, while Buffett may be nervous, the rest of us can invest in this new industry BEFORE the old money realizes what hit them.

KPMG advises we're "on the cusp of revolutionary change" coming much "sooner than you think."

Even one legendary MIT professor had to recant his position that the technology was "beyond the capability of computer science." (He recently confessed to The Wall Street Journal that he's now a believer and amazed "how quickly this technology caught on.")

Yet according to one J.D. Power and Associates survey, only 1 in 5 Americans are even interested in this technology, much less ready to invest in it. Needless to say, you haven't missed your window of opportunity. 

Think about how many amazing technologies you've watched soar to new heights while you kick yourself thinking, "I knew about that technology before everyone was talking about it, but I just sat on my hands." 

Don't let that happen again. This time, it should be your family telling you, "I can't believe you knew about and invested in that technology so early on."

That's why I hope you take just a few minutes to access the exclusive research our team of analysts has put together on this industry and the one stock positioned to capitalize on this major shift.

Click here to learn about this incredible technology before Buffett stops being scared and starts buying!

David Hanson owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway and American Express. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, Google, and Coca-Cola.We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

©1995-2014 The Motley Fool. All rights reserved. | Privacy/Legal Information