Microsoft Pressures Pirates

Recs

0

Geekdom is more than a little bit like Bizarro world -- or maybe Italy -- where familiar notions of right and wrong are twisted to fit the culture and the facts. (Just kidding, Italy. I tease because I love.) To get an idea of what I'm talking about, consider the following:

If I steal a car from under the rainbow tent at Fred's Pontiac, how many of you think that Fred should upgrade my brake system if a manufacturing error is found? I don't see too many hands.

Now, if I steal a computer operating system, how many of you think that I should get free upgrades and security patches? Still not too many hands? Well, in Geekdom you'd see a lot more arms waving in the air, because, as the argument goes, by patching the pirate systems, you decrease the danger to legitimate users.

This is an issue that's been simmering in the tech news for the past month or so ever since Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) group product manager Barry Goffe made comments indicating that Service Pack 2 (SP2), a much-awaited upgrade to Windows XP, would not specifically exclude well-known pirated product keys. This position, a reversal from the policy for SP1, was welcomed by many IT commentators, who pointed out that it would reduce the possibility of major network disruptions that could otherwise be spawned on the millions of unprotected pirate systems.

But then the other shoe dropped. Word came out of Redmond that, in fact, the 20 most common pirate keys would be shut out from SP2. Microsoft critics wasted no time in venting their spleen. Linux advocates were quick to note that their security fixes (like the OS itself) are available free. But Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) fans, who always seem to enjoy watching Microsoft squirm, had less cause for chuckling.

Since OSX, Apple users have had a taste of mainstream-OS agony, enduring pay-to-play service packs like "Jaguar" and "Panther." Late last month, they were treated to a critical security flaw, along with the griping that comes from security professionals when the folks at headquarters don't treat it as seriously as they should. The most severe of the threats was patched only this morning, with little fanfare.

Interested in more Fool tech coverage?

Fool contributor Seth Jayson always loves hearing from brittle Apple fans. He owns no company mentioned. View his Fool profile here.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 508331, ~/articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 7/4/2009 3:28:13 PM

Keep Reading:

“Microsoft Pressures Pirates”

We will use your email address only to keep you informed about updates to our web site and about other products and services that we think might interest you. The Motley Fool respects your privacy. Please read our Privacy Statement

.

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

What Fools Are Saying

Get involved! »

Most Recent

Jul 2 at 4:22 PM

Market Summary

DJIA 8,280.74 -223.32 -2.63%
S&P 500 896.42 -26.91 -2.91%
NASD 1,796.52 +0.00 +0.00%
Sponsored by:

Related Tickers

Apple, Inc.

CAPS Rating 3/5 Stars

$140.02

-2.81 (-1.97%)

Outperform20242

Underperform1750

Rate This Stock