The Happy Meal in Front of the Bulldozer

Recs

2

It's not that I don't like McDonald's (NYSE: MCD). I enjoy its food and coffee, and despite the recent months of market unease, the stock has risen from $45 to $60 a share since this past April. But just when the company seemed to be going gangbusters, a new initiative in Florida could return some tarnish to the Golden Arches.

The junk-food incentive
On Dec. 6, Advertising Age reported that McDonald's was placing Happy Meal coupons on report cards. The company picked up the $1,600 cost of printing 27,000 report cards for elementary-school kids in Florida, in exchange for including its coupon on report-card covers. Kids who earned all A's or B's, or met some other basic criteria, "earned" a free Happy Meal. For a fraction of the cost of traditional advertising, Mickey D's got its message delivered directly to a highly desirable young audience.

Nutrition strikes back
Not surprisingly, several consumer groups and parents aren't happy. One parent quoted by Advertising Age fumed that her daughter now believes her good grades entitle her to a Happy Meal. Sadly, this McMisstep follows the company's considerable progress in dismantling its former image as an "evil" company out to stuff kids with junk food. Among other savvy moves, the company added healthier fare to its menu, and it's agreed to limit the amount of advertising it aims at children under the age of 12.

Whether the report-card tactic was right or wrong, it occurs to me that somebody over at McDonald's needs a lesson in value investing. Sure, you got a great deal on targeted advertising to a lucrative demographic. But was it really worth the bad publicity, especially when the public had finally begun to give you the benefit of the doubt?

What's that rumbling sound?
I'd consider this the advertising equivalent of what Warren Buffett described as "picking up pennies in front of a bulldozer." Sure, you can make some money doing it, but if goes wrong, you have a serious problem on your hands. In investing parlance, that's what we call an asymmetric payoff -- in this case, in the wrong direction!

Companies need to better recognize the link between "doing well" and "doing good." In today's social and economic environment, choosing the latter isn't just the right thing to do -- it's often the right business decision, too.

For related Foolishness:

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 550066, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/22/2009 3:53:19 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:04 PM
MCD $63.97 Up +0.56 +0.88%
McDonald's Corp CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Fed Model: The Fed Model (not endorsed by the Federal Reserve) hypothesizes that the market is in equilibrium when the earnings yield on the S&P 500 matches the yield on the 10 year Treasury note. Any dissonance in the relationship would show that equity valuations are out of whack.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!