How You Can Make More Money

This could very well blow your mind ...

More than $600 billion was deposited in stock mutual funds in 2007. That brings the rapidly rising grand total of money stashed in stock mutual funds to an astounding $6.5 trillion.

That's enough cold hard cash to build a land bridge to Asia.

OK, maybe that's a stretch
But if you think $6.5 trillion is a lot of money to be invested in stocks, consider that there's another $4.8 trillion invested in bonds and money market funds. It's less, sure, but it's still a full 40% of the total.

In other words, American investors have a lot of money invested -- and that money seems to be invested far too conservatively.

Yes, those numbers are a quick-and-dirty way to arrive at that conclusion. But -- and it's big "but" -- to our way of thinking here at The Motley Fool, investors with a timeline of 10 years or more should be holding no more than 10% of their investable assets in bonds -- let alone anything in money markets.

And yet we clearly do ...

Dumb and dumber-er?
American investors aren't dumb. We're uninformed -- a reason for the mad rush of money into professionally managed mutual funds since 1996. Fund assets under management have increased nearly 11% annually over the past decade, as the number of funds available for investment has increased from 6,293 to 8,017, according to the Investment Company Institute.

And fund companies are cashing in. Fidelity Select Brokerage (FSLBX) -- a sector-tracking fund that counts Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS  ) , Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS  ) , and Lehman Brothers (NYSE: LEH  ) among its top holdings -- is up more than 12% annually over the past 10 years. That nearly doubles the S&P 500's return!

Pay up for ... junk
Of course, the majority of the funds out there fail to beat or even match their benchmarks, despite holding some solid stocks. Take John Hancock Growth Trends (JGTBX), for example. Despite holding solid five-year performers such as Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ  ) , Cisco Systems (Nasdaq: CSCO  ) , and Gilead Sciences (Nasdaq: GILD  ) , the fund has been walloped by the S&P 500 to the tune of more than four percentage points per year since 2002.

Why are the fund's customers so underserved? For one, they're paying the fund's managers an absurd 2.35% expense ratio -- which means investors are starting out 2.35% in the hole. That's a big hurdle to overcome.

And while the fund's managers probably love cashing their fat checks, your payments to them are preventing you from doing the same!

We pay you to what?
The Investment Company Institute recently broke down the workforces at these fund companies by job function. Would it shock you to discover that just 31% of the folks working in this enormous and profitable industry are actually dedicated to picking and researching investment opportunities?

In other words, 69% more are not.

And while some of these excess workers perform critical functions, such as ensuring regulatory compliance, another good chunk are focused on sales and marketing. But why draw a distinction? Your absurd fees pay for all of them.

Cut the fat. Pick your own stocks.
Is it a big step? Yes. Is it an impossible one? Heck, no. Here are three time-tested tips to get started:

  1. Only invest money that you won't need for at least three to five years.
  2. Keep investing money on a regular basis, and never try to time the market's machinations.
  3. Diversify your portfolio broadly enough so that a few bad surprises won't ruin your returns.

Of course, that's only the tip of the iceberg.

Make it happen
But if you'd like to learn more about valuing and picking your own stocks, consider joining our Motley Fool Stock Advisor investing service. There, Fool co-founders David and Tom Gardner bring you regular interviews and investment lessons from top business leaders, keep you up to date on breaking market news, and help answer your questions on the service's dedicated discussion boards.

And here's the best part: They also pick two stocks each month that they believe will beat the market for the next decade or more. Since inception in 2002, those picks are beating the market by more than 40 percentage points on average. You can see each and every one of them by trying out the service free for 30 days. Click here for more information. There is no obligation to subscribe.

This article was first published on July 23, 2007. It has been updated.

Tim Hanson does not own shares of any company mentioned. The Fool's disclosure policy requires no stimuli.


Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (1)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

DocumentId: 567500, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/20/2014 3:38:54 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

TREND TRACKER: Get Rich When the Web Goes Dark

It's time to say "goodbye" to your Internet! One bleeding-edge technology is about to put the World Wide Web to bed. And if you act right away, it could make you wildly rich. Experts are calling it the single largest business opportunity in the history of capitalism… The Economist is calling it "transformative"... but you'll probably just call it "how I made my millions." Big money is already on the move. Don't be too late to the party – find out the 1 stock to own when the Web goes dark.


Advertisement