I Turned $3,000 Into $210,000

Recs

2

This article's swaggering headline smacks of exaggeration -- but it's true.

How it happened
Picture it: New Jersey, 1995. Although not then a Motley Fool employee, I was, perhaps like you, an avid reader of Fool.com. Founding brothers David and Tom Gardner occasionally recommended stocks, and one of their recommendations was an online service provider, America Online.

I was still quite new to investing, and I didn't know enough to do much of my own research. But I did have one thing going for me: I was an AOL customer. I used the service every day, and I liked what I saw of its user-friendliness, utility, and potential. So I bought. I snapped up $3,000 worth of shares and hung on.

Over the next several years, the stock went up and down, sometimes significantly -- but I held on. It mostly went up, and it split and split. I remember checking my portfolio regularly -- several times a day! -- to see how rich I was becoming. Near the stock's peak, I had a 70-bagger! My $3,000 investment had turned into $210,000. If it doubled in value only twice more, I'd be (almost) a millionaire! All from a measly $3,000 investment.

Did I sell shares along the ride up? No. (Some of us don't know when to cut our losses.) Did I sell at least some near the top, when my mom told me to? Nope. (That strange thudding sound you hear is me banging my head on my desk. The silence is my mom, biting her tongue.) I held on.

AOL merged with Time Warner in 2001, and for years after that, the stock struggled. I remember when shares were priced in the $70s, but it's a fuzzy memory. They spent years below $20 until relatively recently, and now they're in the single digits. I did sell a big chunk of my shares -- in the teens -- when I needed money for a down payment on my house. And I finally got smart -- I sold more shares to diversify into other stocks instead of holding a big chunk of my net worth in a company in which I no longer had faith.

I continue to hold a few shares, though, and despite my inclination to curse my stupidity for not selling earlier, I'm still sitting on a handsome profit, even at current levels. My cost basis is ridiculously low, and this has still been one of my best investments ever. I shouldn't complain.

How you can do it
If any part of this story appeals to you, know that you have a chance to make it yours -- perhaps with a happier ending -- if you make a few decisions differently. (You might end up as an accidental billionaire!)

Buy what you know
First, pay attention to products and services you know, use, and love -- especially if you see more and more people using them. There may be a great stock behind them, and knowing their products or services will go a long way toward understanding the business. Plenty of well-known companies have done phenomenally well over the past decade or two -- let's look at a few.

Have you been getting a lot of prescriptions filled lately? Well, CVS Caremark (NYSE: CVS) has been an eight-bagger over the past 20 years. Are you wearing Nike (NYSE: NKE) sneakers? Despite the market swoon, Nike shareholders have averaged more than 9% gains per year over the past decade, trouncing the market's return.

Love your desktop computer or your trusty printer? Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ) shares have averaged 11% returns over the past 20 years. These companies have performed rather well, right under our noses. Cell phone companies have done well, too -- with Nokia (NYSE: NOK) averaging 13% annual returns over the past 15 years.

Beware what you don't
Along those same lines, be wary of what you don't understand. If you don't understand how a business makes money, you probably won't be able to tell when business is going badly. Biotechnology companies present a good example, as do new-technology companies. Think of Amgen (Nasdaq: AMGN). If you're invested in it, do you have a good grasp of its multiple treatment modalities -- large-molecule proteins, small molecules, and antibodies, among other things? If you're invested in Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL), do you have a solid handle on the database software industry?

You'd do well to learn from the mistakes of others, too.

Hang on for the ride
If you buy into a company hoping that it will be a multibagger for you, buy to hold as long as you continue to understand the business, strategy, and leadership. If you have faith in the company's future, it's often best to just hang on, despite inevitable hiccups. If you still have long-term confidence, don't let naysayers in the media get you out of a stock because of short-term concerns.

Consider the home-building specialist Toll Brothers (NYSE: TOL). For some of its earliest investors, it's been a 17-bagger over the past 20 years. For those who've hung on for just the past decade, through some down years and the market's recent upheaval, it has still averaged a 12% annual gain, far surpassing the S&P 500's negative average. So -- not bad, eh?

Sell if things get too crazy
Consider selling some of your shares if they hit levels you can't justify or if the company is facing some long-term problems. That was my main mistake -- irrationally and greedily hoping to get even richer. If a stock is trading for far more than you know it's worth, and you still hang on, you're no longer investing -- you're speculating, and at great risk.

This kind of issue is what investors in companies such as customer information management specialist salesforce.com need to think about. Its stock was recently trading at a P/E ratio around 100, based on trailing-12-month earnings. Is that reasonable, or has the stock gotten ahead of itself?

Get help from the pros
Finally, consider checking out the stocks that David and Tom Gardner recommend. Their Motley Fool Stock Advisor service, launched more than six years ago, offers two picks (and two investing styles) each month. They have a few losers, of course, but on average, their recommendations are beating the S&P 500 by more than 23 percentage points.

I invite you to try Stock Advisor free for 30 days, when you'll have full access to all past issues and recommendations. I've found some good stocks for my own portfolio there.

Here's to big profits in your future!   

This article was originally published Feb. 2, 2006. It has been updated.

Longtime contributor Selena Maranjian owns shares of Time Warner and Amgen. Nokia is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. The Motley Fool is Fools writing for Fools.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 19, 2008, at 11:34 AM, Alexhorntoad wrote:

    Dumb azz!

    AOL was a stupid stock to buy and you were stupid to buy it. Lucky for you, the jock at my gym, the illegal alien that mowed my lawn back then, the dumb ditz at Starbucks, and a bunch of other dumbazzes were all just as stupid, so your stock went up.

    Even luckier for you is that just before the dot com bubble burst, AOL was able to convince the shareholders at Timewarner that AOL stock was actually worth something and were able to purchase a decent company with real assets, real earnings and real profits with monopoly money. AOL would have gone to zero after the dot com bubble popped had it not been for this deal.

    You know, I once won a church raffle. I turned $2 into about $50 in less than a day! But I don't brag about it or try to figure out how much money I would have if I repeat that everyday. You shouldn't either.

  • Report this Comment On November 19, 2008, at 11:49 AM, 181736065 wrote:

    Right Time. Right place. Right attitude.

    I am becoming more and more outstanding returns are based on luck as well as research. Usually, you need both.

    Good for you, Selena. Nice to hear you had success. Seriously.

  • Report this Comment On November 19, 2008, at 2:49 PM, ratsnotball wrote:

    good for you salina, also, i owned aol several times and made money for my childrens schools. i saw aols potential, aswell as other companys out there, with the same ideas, new, fresh ideas, minds at work, remember, youve got mail, the movie, what an exciting time to be an american, to see all the potential out there, there seemed to be no end in sight.

    some made money, others lost, what if there were never an internet and people with the courage to invest in their futures, then were would we be.....good luck in your lifes adventures

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 778836, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/10/2009 4:44:43 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Health-Care Reform: A Tale of Two Chambers

Related Tickers

11/9/2009 4:00 PM
ORCL $21.83 Up +0.41 +1.91%
Oracle Corp. CAPS Rating: ****
HPQ $49.99 Up +0.83 +1.69%
Hewlett-Packard Co… CAPS Rating: ***
AMGN $54.91 Up +0.22 +0.40%
Amgen, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
CVS $30.90 Up +1.11 +3.73%
CVS Caremark Corp CAPS Rating: ****
NOK $13.57 Up +0.36 +2.73%
Nokia Corp (ADR) CAPS Rating: ****
TOL $18.23 Up +0.09 +0.50%
Toll Brothers, Inc… CAPS Rating: *
NKE $65.32 Up +0.76 +1.18%
Nike, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Chief Financial Officer: A Chief Financial Officer aka CFO is a corporate officer, often of a public company, whose primary responsibility is the management of financial risks for said company.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!