Recs

5

This Week's 5 Dumbest Stock Moves

Stupidity is contagious. It gets us all from time to time. Even respectable companies can catch it. Once, I'll to take a look at five of this week's most head-spinningly dumb financial events.

1. Detroit despairs
Ford (NYSE: F  ) , Chrysler, and particularly General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) are back where they started: running on fumes. In a shocking upset, their proposed government bailout spun out of control last night, when the UAW failed to concede the resetting of wages comparable to foreign counterparts until at least 2011. Those who opposed the costly lifelines wanted a more competitive cost structure right away. After all, the carmakers want the money now, not three years from now.

The CEOs blew the first round. Now the union is taking its lumps in Round 2.

2. A fumbled delivery
FedEx (NYSE: FDX  ) got roughed up earlier this week, after the speedy-delivery specialist slashed its guidance for its fiscal year. The company is now looking to earn between $3.50 a share and $4.75 a share this year, or roughly 18% lower than its original outlook.

FedEx isn't the only company talking down its near-term profitability. It makes the dumb list this week because the company is lowering its guidance, even in an environment where fuel prices are plummeting and FedEx is inexplicably trying to push through price hikes. Those factors should add up to wider margins, but now net income is going the other way. Go figure. It's not "brown," but it's most certainly black and blue.

3. Mad about Madoff
Bernard Madoff was arrested last night, charged with masterminding a Ponzi scheme that may have bilked investors out of more than $50 billion. The former Nasdaq Stock Market chairman obviously should know better than to run afoul of securities-fraud allegations.

Is he innocent? Guilty? We'll let the courts decide that. However, with investors already hesitant to crawl back into the market after the pounding that stocks have taken over the past year, the last thing they need to worry about is a rash of unscrupulous advisors.

There may be one silver lining here: More investors might take charge of over their own investments. If so, the full-service brokerage industry will feel the pain.

4. Soft times for hard drives
Things aren't pretty at Seagate (NYSE: STX  ) . The hard-drive maker now expects to generate $2.3 billion to $2.6 billion in fourth-quarter revenue, well shy of its original target of as much as $3.05 billion.

Aren't computers selling briskly? Sure, if they're dirt-cheap netbooks. Even then, the lightest ones are going with lower-capacity solid-state drives over spinning hard disks. As hard drives continue to give way to the more portable flash memory in camcorders, laptops, and MP3 players, the top-dog spot for consumer-level computer storage may belong more to flash giant SanDisk (Nasdaq: SNDK  ) than  more conventional drivesmiths like Seagate.

5. All that glitters isn't Goldman
Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS  ) is in the doghouse again. Bloomberg is reporting that the company is advising clients to buy credit default swaps on municipal bonds -- essentially, a trade that appreciates if the underlying bonds fall in value. The problem? Goldman Sachs often acted as a lead underwriter in selling those same municipal bonds in the first place?

This isn't the first time that Goldman has tried to profit from the downturn of products it originally championed. "Goldman caught a fair amount of flak earlier this year, after reports that it made a $4 billion windfall shorting asset-backed securities," fellow Fool Morgan Housel writes in taking the company to task this week -- and rightfully so.  

Let's beat the dumb drum:

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Nasdaq OMX Group is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. FedEx is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz is a fan of dumb and smart business moves. Investors can learn plenty from both. Hdoes not own shares in any of the stocks in this story. Rick is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2008, at 6:07 PM, tpc616 wrote:

    #5 makes an exiciting headline but is a meaningless filler. first, would you prefer the brokerage side of a bank to always promote its own investment banking (other side of a Chinese wall) products, or one who may have very different views occasionally. second, if a product a broker sold you is deteriorating, would you prefer an advice to liquidate and/or buy insurance, or no advice at all?

    all i am saying is, who knows whether the intention is good or sinister? not enough information.

    ps: i'm not a GS employee or stock holder.

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2008, at 8:03 PM, mpiet wrote:

    How much would a SSD based 120GB iPod classic cost?

  • Report this Comment On December 12, 2008, at 9:21 PM, ImGrounded wrote:

    Rick Munarriz has his head up in the clouds or perhaps somewhere else???? Truely understand the market segment you are talking about or do not comment at all. Armchair commentaor if I ever heard one.

  • Report this Comment On December 13, 2008, at 6:41 PM, TMFBreakerRick wrote:

    mpiet, fair point on the capacity costs, but you're asking the wrong question I think. Why are the flash-based iPods outselling the chunkier drive-based iPods? Storage capacity is clearly not THE deal breaker with consumer.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 794109, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/14/2012 9:50:05 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,878.28 4.24 0.03%
S&P 500 1,350.50 -1.27 -0.09%
NASD 2,931.83 0.44 0.02%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/14/2012 4:01 PM
GS $112.87 Down -1.66 -1.45%
Goldman Sachs Grou… CAPS Rating: ***
SNDK $47.00 Up +0.37 +0.78%
SanDisk Corp CAPS Rating: ****
STX $26.60 Up +0.55 +2.11%
Seagate Technology CAPS Rating: ***
F $12.48 Down -0.06 -0.48%
Ford CAPS Rating: ****
FDX $95.55 Down -1.43 -1.47%
FedEx CAPS Rating: ****
GM $25.40 Up +0.06 +0.24%
General Motors Com… CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement