Time to Invest

Recs

9

In the middle of 2006, I came across a stock with some unbelievable numbers. Revenue was up more than 80% per year for the past three years. Income had grown 95% over the same time. Return on equity was a robust 47%, and net margins were close to 42%. Plus, it was a player in the growing student loan market. Its name? First Marblehead (NYSE: FMD).

Based on what I knew -- which wasn't much -- I gave First Marblehead a lot of consideration. But did I pull the trigger? First, let me say that even thinking about making an investment without weeks of research is alien to me. I come from a value-focused hedge fund. We had all day to analyze stocks, and we used it, often burning the midnight oil.

Hedge funds have a reputation as the gunslingers of the market, but I assure you, mine was anything but. We held just a handful of stocks, and we knew them cold. But keeping track of them, and finding new ones, took a lot of time. That kind of thoroughness is what The Motley Fool is all about. When it comes to burning the midnight oil, David and Tom Gardner -- Motley Fool co-founders and lead analysts of the Motley Fool Stock Advisor newsletter -- could give the hedge-fund crowd a run for their collective money.

Hidden risks
No, I didn't buy First Marblehead. And I'm glad I didn't, considering the recent credit fears that have spooked investors, and the specter of defaults that has slashed the stock by more than 90%. But I'm not really here to criticize First Marblehead; it suffered from some events outside its control, and several of my colleagues continue to monitor its long-term prospects.

Regardless, risk exists, and with any investment, it's important to know what you're betting on. No screen or quick peekaboo would warn you of the effect the credit markets would have on First Marblehead, or the significant exposure Merrill Lynch (acquired by Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), Citigroup (NYSE: C), and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) would have to subprime loans. Then you have companies such as Bed Bath & Beyond (Nasdaq: BBBY) and Blue Coat Systems (Nasdaq: BCSI), which had to take charges against earnings because of undiscovered options backdating.

Granted, these risks may all be on the obvious side, but have you ever been burned because you missed a material piece of information? Having the time to do some diligent digging is crucial in avoiding potential blowups.

The "Are you kidding me?" formula
There's more. Years ago, I read a book about theories underlying accounting and financial statements. It spent a lot of pages on a common solvency formula: earnings available to pay fixed charges, divided by those fixed charges. With several chapters of buildup, it replaced the simple version with a "corrected" formula that made several tweaks to the numerator and denominator. Was it right? Yes -- it eliminated a lot of flaws in the raw accounting numbers. But that accuracy came at the expense of a formula so complex that individual investors would need days to calculate it.

Lack of time tends to pull investors in one of two ways. The first: making futile grasps in a blizzard of information overload. The second: tunnel vision toward stocks you've already researched. Let's face it -- either one can burn you.

Having time troubles with your investing?
The best investment you can make is an investment in your time management, and I've got ideas for you. The first is simple: Develop screens and hone your criteria for investments. With 10,000 stocks and a day job, you absolutely have to develop efficient methods for cutting to the ones you're likely to like. Second, spread the load among trusted compatriots. Start an investing club with like-minded investor friends.

If you're still pressed for time, consider a free trial of Motley Fool Stock Advisor. The harried will like that two stock recommendations come floating their way every month, while the detail-oriented will appreciate the investment theses, complete with counterpoints, provided behind each selection. To date, David and Tom's picks are beating the market by 30 percentage points. You're never far from an investing club of sorts, since Stock Advisor membership comes with access to exclusive discussion boards where members can share thoughts, insights, and questions without the plague of profane and inane comments typical of boards elsewhere.

Even if you don't sign up for the newsletter, take a few moments to think about how time has affected your investing. If the answer is "negatively," consider taking some sort of action to get a better handle on your future. Investing is a critically important task -- one that shouldn't get neglected as often as it does.

Claiming your free 30-day trial subscription to Stock Advisor won't take long at all. Simply click here.

This article was originally published Feb. 23, 2005. It has been updated.

James Early does not own any of the stocks discussed in this article. Bank of America is a Motley Fool Income Investor pick. Bed Bath & Beyond is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. Bed Bath & Beyond is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor selection. The Fool owns shares of Bed Bath & Beyond. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy with regard to such interests.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On January 11, 2009, at 1:16 PM, Wyomingtim wrote:

    Could you have written a more offensive ad for TMF? Good lord, FMD was a MF pick, but no mention of that in this ad! For those of us that PAID for a subscription to the MF, you now rub our noses in the loss (recommended at $40, now under $2). Shame on you.

  • Report this Comment On January 12, 2009, at 2:51 PM, Xitopie wrote:

    Completely agree with you Wyomingtim.

    I can't believe there is no mention that FMD was a Fool recommendation several times over in Tom's Hidden Gem newsletter. The sell recommendation came when the stock hit the single digits.

    This is why I canceled my Hidden Gems newsletter.

    Just like the rest of Wall Street, there is no accountability?

  • Report this Comment On January 12, 2009, at 3:08 PM, kamuirei wrote:

    wow.

  • Report this Comment On January 13, 2009, at 7:37 AM, syracuse315 wrote:

    I bought FMD when it was recommended around the $14 price range, again recommended by TMF, I think this was their third recommendation of the stock. Now $1.37 a share and as of last month I cancelled my subscription to TMF, never to go back. I appreciate accountability and TMF does not have it, no mention at all of their error and miscalculations, they are just trying to sell more subscriptions through covering up the truth!

  • Report this Comment On January 13, 2009, at 10:35 AM, SBeren wrote:

    TMF analysts are fairly good at looking at companies, but they have absolutely no clue about economics. Anyone who has even a minute education in asset management knows that economic assessment is the first step in asset management. We can excuse that they didn't have a crystal ball, but they were recommending FMD throughout the credit market collapse. It was laughable reading their recommendations. A lot of their great performance were never recommended to be sold, now all gains were wiped out, can you say MIDD? Anyways, plenty of free resources online. Sites like Fool are inefficient, and if it were publicly traded I'd stay away.

  • Report this Comment On January 13, 2009, at 11:04 AM, SBeren wrote:

    Also, all of TMF services benchmark themselves to the S&P, instead of a benchmark more in line with their investing style. Furthermore, their performance numbers are suspect since it appears that they compare their 5 year return vs S&P's 1 year return. If I'm wrong about this, I'd be curious to see their 1 year / 3 year/ 5 year performance compared to S&P. Perhaps someone will point me toward those figures. (I won't hold my breath).

  • Report this Comment On January 13, 2009, at 3:59 PM, MFRB101 wrote:

    You are absolutely right about the gross insult this is to TMF letter subscribers. What is it trying to achieve. Is it saying that Hidden Gems is a crappy service and subscribers should select Stock Advisor.. If thats the case than what is to make of Satyam recommendation...

    Credit should be given where due. In that regard there comparison with S&P are consistent with the timing on stock pick. So if they say long term they are beathing S&P they are not lying. However, if you compare them year over year, I am sure HG or other TMF news letter do not always beat S&P and they dont make that claim.

    So while there analysts are well meaning and are not lying, advertisements like these certainly are shamefull. The better avoid rubbing salt over the injury not the least od which includes fessing up that one of their services recommended this dog

  • Report this Comment On January 13, 2009, at 6:59 PM, factor1 wrote:

    I am stunned...is this a joke? This is more than offensive, its smacks of gross negligence!! James Early arrogantly flaunts that fact that he woudn't be suckered into buying First Marblehead and then implies that for those of us who might have been tempted to make such a misguided decision (given a 20/20 hindsight review) we might want to consider subcribing to the TMF Stock Advisor?!?!

    Mr. Early doesn't even seem to be aware that TMF's Gardner, the same gentlemen behind "Hidden Gems", recommended First Marblehead as a 3 time "Best Buy" and never saw any of the of the macro issues relating to mortgage backed securities, derivatives and their impact on the securitization market coming. Further, TMF Gems then quite suddenly dumped the stock at single digits!! (oh yes there were some fairly general risks outlined but really very insight around those high level vaguely described risks was ever provided)

    It seems that Mr. Gardner and company were too busy writing a new book and building intelligent investing software (which based on experience to date I would not want to trust) to spend the time taking care of his core customers...I have just finished cancelling my three year subscription of to hidden gems and my one year subscription to million dollar portfolio!! I will now proceed to cancel my Stock Advisor subscription given this latest example (there have been numerous such as these over the last several months) of in your face arrogance! I'm only sorry that TMF is not a public company so that I can't short the stock.

    I am a big boy, and don't expect to blindly jump into a stock based solely on a newsletter's recommendation, however if TMF cannot provide insight that I cannot generate myself, what am I paying for...to have them rub my face in my losses as they laugh all the way to the bank with our subscription fees?

    P.T. Barnum famously said that "there's a sucker born every minute"...good riddance TMF, this sucker just got wise!!

    Factor1

  • Report this Comment On January 13, 2009, at 7:39 PM, brwn8484 wrote:

    One other item of great importance that MF forgets to include in its company analysis.... 98% of the stocks out there exhibit a seasonality within the year as well as within the broad economic cycles. This seasonality is so powerful that on average, 90% of a stocks price fluctuation can be traced to seasonality. So... If an analyst is basing his recommendations on fundamentals and seasonality is working against good financials, seasonality will usually win.

    It has been my experience that fundamentals are very important as long as seasonality is factored in. But most stocks will not perform well (regardless of company financial health) if paired against negative seasonal timing.

    I know, I know .... puts a cold splashh of water in the face of the whole "Buy and Hold" mentality that pervades wall street. I have been using seasonality combined with probability to trade stocks and Mutual Funds. Regardless of what you believe, I have been able to improve my performance by minimizing risk through seasonal optimization of buys and sells.

    Anyway, I wish all investors a better 2009. We all need a break. Especially when you consider that our leaders have yet to hold anyone accountable for the financial crisis which is rooted in criminal and immoral behavior. Makes me think that we still have major major major trouble ahead.

  • Report this Comment On January 16, 2009, at 1:20 PM, etamar2 wrote:

    Well, I must admit I am bewildered, but hardly bewitched.

    Seems Motley Fool really shot itself in the foot, mocking its own recommendation for so long. Yes, I am a subscriber and just prolonged to another year.

    To be more balanced, I have to admit Hidden Gems brought me a few successful investments, but overall was short-sighted this year (Aladdin was just sold, after being recommended and immediately dropped, for one).

    What is going on, Gardners? Have you neglected the oasis you boast about in your ads!?

    Not cancelling yet (I'm a "long" player) - but just pulled a yellow card at you.

  • Report this Comment On January 16, 2009, at 6:00 PM, SaddlebackMtn wrote:

    Unfortunately, The Fool has become what it despised in the past.

    Chasing new subscribers has become their main priority.

    Accurate and reliable info is no longer to be found here. I've seen three articles about AOB in the past week. Each one contradicting the other ????

    I will not renew my subcriptions. I'm done here !

  • Report this Comment On January 26, 2009, at 1:48 PM, eng2 wrote:

    I bought FMD on a Motley Fool recommendation.

    Now, I am down over 95% - virtually lost all of my money.

    How can another MF author write this "I told you so" article?

    Do not pay to subscribe to any service of the Motley Fool.

    Is anyone listening out there?

  • Report this Comment On January 28, 2009, at 12:27 PM, egel wrote:

    I am also of the opinion that the Motley Fool has become an incestuous group. The MF recommendations have performed poorly as to be polite.Then this idiotic CAPS member pool. They always recommend the picks of the MF as the best investment idea. And then all these "special for me"- offers for more subscribtions. I get sick of their methods. Was a subscriber of the MF Hidden Gems but I am going to have my subsription cancelled and my fee recuperated.

  • Report this Comment On January 29, 2009, at 4:58 PM, SBeren wrote:

    ...they finally lived up to their name. How much credibility does the author have? After all, he went from working at a Hedge Fund to working for court jesters instead.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 807481, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/1/2009 8:08:51 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
The Public Health-Care Plan's Problem

Related Tickers

11/30/2009 4:00 PM
BAC $15.85 Up +0.38 +2.46%
Bank of America Co… CAPS Rating: ***
FMD $2.07 Up +0.03 +1.47%
The First Marblehe… CAPS Rating: ****
BCSI $26.43 Down -0.32 -1.20%
Blue Coat Systems,… CAPS Rating: ***
MS $31.58 Up +1.07 +3.51%
Morgan Stanley CAPS Rating: **
C $4.11 Up +0.05 +1.23%
Citigroup, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
BBBY $37.36 Up +0.37 +1.00%
Bed Bath & Beyond,… CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Immediate or cancel: Immediate or Cancel (IOC) is a condition a trader or investor can include in his/her purchase or sale of a stock

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!