5-Star Stocks on the Upswing

Recs

6

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Sadly, there's no such thing as an ultimate buy signal when it comes to investing in stocks. Identifying companies with the wind at their back takes time, patience, and a good dose of due diligence.

There is, however, an easy way to increase your odds of finding the stocks that will beat the market. At Motley Fool CAPS, the Fool's investing community of more than 125,000 members, we've found that five-star stocks, as a group, substantially outperform the broader market -- to the tune of 12 percentage points on an annualized basis from November 2006 to July 2008.

In order to fully capture the upside potential of those five-star stocks, it makes sense to identify them just as soon as they achieve five-star status. Fortunately, our CAPS screener now makes it possible to do this. Below, for example, is a list of companies that have been upgraded to five-star status from four stars just yesterday. These stock ideas are only a starting point, of course. Be sure to join us on CAPS to dig in even further.

Company

All-Stars Saying Outperform

Orthofix International NV (Nasdaq: OFIX)

120 of 126

WuXi PharmaTech (Cayman), Inc. (ADR) (NYSE: WX)

285 of 298

Unilever N.V. (ADR) (NYSE: UN)

304 of 313

Raytheon Company (NYSE: RTN)

983 of 1037

Aqua America, Inc. (NYSE: WTR)

378 of 407

DRDGOLD Ltd. (ADR) (Nasdaq: DROOY)

119 of 134

Brush Engineered Material (NYSE: BW)

255 of 271

Data from Motley Fool CAPS, Feb. 12, 2009.

Come join us on CAPS, absolutely free, to learn more about these and countless other interesting stock ideas.

“The Next Great Investment”… That’s how a top global investor describes India’s potential. On Nov. 28, The Motley Fool’s Tim Hanson returns to India to prove it. Follow along in real time and get his TOP pick first (Hanson returned from China in July with a stock that’s up 169%!). Enter email below.

Disclosure is important to us here at The Motley Fool. No individual person selected the stocks in this article, so there is no author to disclose an interest in them. Since this article was automatically generated, it is possible that Motley Fool personnel (and even The Motley Fool itself, through our Motley Fool Pro, Million Dollar Portfolio, and Ready Made Millionaire services), have positions in these stocks. We thought you'd like to know that. You can learn more about The Motley Fool’s disclosure policy here.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 02, 2009, at 10:25 AM, michaellee1818 wrote:

    Back to Oct. 1, 2008. I posted the following comments. It is still true and the operation of WX seems getting worse. Co-founder left the company. Now CFO left too. Board chairman's wife was added to the board. What's going on in side the company? Did "Fool Investor" who is still a bull of WX ask youself this question? Again, I believe the stock will drop further. I don't believe a drug research and develop company without its own intelectual properties will survive in the long.

    "Many reasons indicate bullish on the pharma research and development outsourcing companies are foolish:

    1. We saw the boom and failure of electronic outsources companies, like JBL, CLS, etc, in the late 1999 and earlier 2000.

    2. The management of big pharmas and small biotechs are not sure how these waves of outsources are going to benefit their drug discoveries efforts. So far every company seems just following the trend and rushes to find partners in India and China. But the results are not that good. I didn't hear anyone find a super chemical from their outsourse efforts. And the cost of outsources are going higher and higher and eventually going to level out with their internal research and development cost.

    3. The biggest problems with outsources are the intellectual protection. How can you trust your partners with countries like China and India even the baby food produced in those countries are not safe.

    4. Current big pharma and small biotech executives are mostly pursuing on cheat and quick results and forgot drug discovery needs serious,diligent scientific researches. Good drugs come with patient and detailed scientific studies. Relying on outside partners and solely focusing on commercial purpose won't be fruitful. This is why although the breakthrough of humangenone in the 1990's and big dollars spent following this by pharmas and biotechs were not fruitful. In fact the new drugs FDA approved in 2008 are less than the new drugs approved in FDA in 1982 when much less money was spent on drug R&D.

    5. Pharma executives and biotech alike will soon realized the efforts spent on outsource researches are really waste time and money. They will suddenly reduce the capacities of outsources. Just like in the 1990's, those executives believed in computer modelling can figure out a wonder molecule that ultimately didn't churn out anything. Most the computer modellers lost jobs later on. In later 1990's combinatorial technologies such as combinatorial chemistry seems solved the bottleneck of drug discovery. That didn't work out either. Most of the combinatorial departments in big pharmas were ultimately dissolved.

    6. Like the electronic outsourcing conpanies, pharma outsourcing companies need huge investment and fast expansion in their research facilities and headcount expansions when contracts are signed. When pharmas and biotechs start to reduce or even stabilize their amount of outsorucing, the fix cost for those outsouring companies are going to huge. The already low margins are going to be even lower.

    In all, the evetual fate for these pharma and biotech drug research and development outsourcing companies are going to the same as electronic outsourcing companies in the 1990's. I think if Obama become the next president, the political hurdel of outsourcing researches to other countries are going to much higher. The stock price for those companies outside US, like WX, is going to trend lower."

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 830915, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/24/2009 3:08:26 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Live Chat on India, China, and the Demise of the Dollar

Related Tickers

11/24/2009 2:51 PM
BW $18.31 Down -0.25 -1.35%
Brush Engineered M… CAPS Rating: *****
RTN $51.54 Up +0.10 +0.19%
Raytheon Company CAPS Rating: ****
DROOY $5.31 Down -0.08 -1.49%
DRDGOLD Ltd. (ADR) CAPS Rating: ****
WTR $16.23 Up +0.02 +0.12%
Aqua America, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
WX $15.41 Up +0.11 +0.72%
WuXi PharmaTech (C… CAPS Rating: ****
UN $31.50 Up +0.15 +0.48%
Unilever N.V. (ADR… CAPS Rating: ****
OFIX $30.84 Down -0.14 -0.45%
Orthofix Internati… CAPS Rating: *****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Barriers to entry: Barriers to entry are aspects of a business that inhibit a competitor's efforts to offer equivalent products or services.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!