Not Listening to Buffett Cost Me Thousands

During the first half of 2008, Berkshire Hathaway Chairman Warren Buffett was ranked by Forbes as the richest man in the world, with an estimated net worth of $62 billion. He's amassed that fortune entirely through investing.

Following the credit crisis and the stock market dive, like the rest of us, he's worth quite a bit less by now, but what's a few billion when you've got that much money? Regardless of his exact current wealth, Buffett's almost universally accepted as one of the world's greatest stock market investors. When he talks, it pays to listen.

Though Buffett is commonly considered a value investor, he seems just as focused on growth. Either way, he's proven that he's an intelligent investor. As Buffett's sidekick Charlie Munger once said, "All intelligent investing is value investing."

Google as a value stock
Buffett focuses on companies with favorable long-term economics and strong competitive advantages -- companies such as American Express (NYSE: AXP  ) , Eaton (NYSE: ETN  ) , Coca-Cola, and Ingersoll-Rand (NYSE: IR  ) -- all current Berkshire holdings.

One Wall Street analyst called Coca-Cola "very expensive" around the time that Buffett started buying it. It wasn't a typical value stock. But as Buffett once said about Coca-Cola: "If you gave me $100 billion and said, take away the soft drink leadership of Coca-Cola in the world, I'd give it back to you and say it can't be done."

Now that's a competitive advantage.

See, value investing is not all about buying stocks with low price-to-earnings, price-to-book, or price-to-sales ratios. Far from it.

For example, Google would have been a great value stock at its IPO in August 2004, despite selling, at the time, for more than 100 times earnings.

A value stock trading for more than 100 times earnings? Yep. Google was growing fast, continuing to take market share, and building sustainable competitive advantages in its enterprising culture, superior advertising platform, and brand loyalty. Given its growth rate since, and its powerful business model, it was underpriced back then.

Investing shock: Buffett was wrong
Buffett didn't buy Google. Sadly, neither did I -- a decision that has cost me thousands.

I held off on buying Google shares because they seemed expensive. I knew it owned the vast majority of the search market share, and had both a great corporate culture and innovative leaders. But I couldn't get past that lofty P/E ratio.

Instead, I was concentrating on buying poor companies on the cheap. These trash stocks, as I call them, have a nasty habit of getting even cheaper -- sometimes even going bust.

At least I'm not alone in buying "trash stocks." In his 1989 letter to Berkshire Hathaway shareholders, Buffett himself admitted to similar crimes. In a section of the letter called "Mistakes of the First Twenty-Five Years (A Condensed Version)," Buffett says he never should have bought control of the textile company Berkshire Hathaway.

Why? Even though he knew that the textile manufacturing business Berkshire operated was in a declining industry, he was enticed to buy because the price looked cheap. While the Berkshire of today wouldn't exist without that original purchase, Buffett reluctantly closed the textile business in 1985.

Which reiterates a timeless Buffett-ism: "It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price."

Value investing for suckers
I'm a great fan of Warren Buffett and like to think of myself as a value investor. But too often I've been guilty of buying those "trash stocks" -- cheap stocks with mediocre (or worse) businesses.

Although I've never owned them, over the years, I've come close to buying shares in Applied Materials (Nasdaq: AMAT  ) , JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM  ) , Boeing (NYSE: BA  ) , and even Target (NYSE: TGT  ) -- all of which appear relatively cheap, but operate in intensely competitive industries and/or carry plenty of debt.

Twenty years have passed since that famous 1989 letter to Berkshire Hathaway investors. As I review my portfolio today, I see fewer and fewer "trash stocks."

Through a combination of expensive errors, experience, and a commitment to continued investing education, I've slowly come to realize that the best long-term investments are in companies in growing industries that possess long-term, sustainable competitive advantages.

A heady combination of value and growth investing
If you need stock ideas today, there are more than a few such companies among our recommendations at Motley Fool Stock Advisor. I've known Fool co-founders and Stock Advisor advisors David and Tom for more than a decade now, and both are intelligent, business-focused investors.

Since the newsletter's inception in April 2002, their recommendations have outperformed the market by around 30 percentage points on average. If you'd like to learn more about their latest stock picks and five favorite ideas for new money, give Stock Advisor a try free for the next 30 days.

I wish you happy, trash-free investing.

This article was first published on March 7, 2008. It has been updated.

Bruce Jackson finds taking out the trash satisfying. He is a beneficial owner of Berkshire Hathaway shares. The Motley Fool also owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, a recommendation of Motley Fool Stock Advisor and of Inside Value. Coca-Cola and American Express are also Inside Value recommendations. JPMorgan Chase is a former Income Investor recommendation. Google is a Rule Breakers pick. The Fool owns shares of American Express. The Motley Fool's disclosure policy is enlightening.


Read/Post Comments (0) | Recommend This Article (10)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

Be the first one to comment on this article.

DocumentId: 841289, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 4/16/2014 9:47:25 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement