Recs

24

Stop Worrying About the Rally

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Everyone seems convinced that the recent rally in stocks has absolutely no chance of holding up. Yet a few years from now, what's happened since March -- and what's yet to come over the next few months -- will be just a bump in the road compared to the overall fortunes of the stock market.

Guts and glory
During times like these, it's tough not to think like a short-term trader. After the market was cut in half in just 15 months, stocks have now jumped by over a third from their March lows. In just two short months, the S&P 500 has erased all of its losses for 2009.

Moreover, those traders who picked the exact bottom have seen some of the worst-hit stocks during the bear market shoot back up with amazing gains. Take a look at some of the top-gaining stocks since March 9:

Stock

Gain Since March 9

1-Year Return

5-Year Avg. Annual Return

Las Vegas Sands (NYSE: LVS  )

569%

(87%)

(28.1%)*

Office Depot (NYSE: ODP  )

374.6%

(79.1%)

(30.6%)

USG (NYSE: USG  )

295%

(55.4%)

3.9%

International Paper (NYSE: IP  )

221.6%

(40.8%)

(15.6%)

Bare Escentuals (Nasdaq: BARE  )

218.5%

(50.9%)

N/A

Citigroup (NYSE: C  )

204.8%

(87.2%)

(39.6%)

Dow Chemical (NYSE: DOW  )

163.1%

(57.3%)

(12.9%)

Source: Yahoo! Finance.
*4-year average return.

Profits like those we've seen from these stocks in the past two months often take years for long-term investors to earn. So it's no wonder that the rally has taken many unprepared investors by surprise -- and left them wondering whether they've made the wrong decision with their long-term investing strategy.

Irrational in two directions
Of course, as the table above shows, there's nothing particularly extraordinary about how these companies have performed when you look at them on a longer-term basis. They've all done worse than the S&P over the past year, and all but USG have underperformed the index since 2004.

The real question, though, is which is more irrational: the plunge in these companies' stock prices, or the ensuing recovery. Clearly, during times of panic like we saw in early March, investors believed that many of these companies were in danger of falling apart. Now, shareholders seem convinced that their failure isn't imminent -- yet they certainly haven't bid shares back up anywhere close to where they traded last May.

In that light, a small rally like this doesn't seem all that ridiculous -- especially in light of the bigger picture.

A little perspective
In late 2007, investors still believed the future would stay bright forever. When that scenario proved grossly incorrect, stock prices took a 57% haircut, most of which has happened just since last September. Now, after a seemingly huge rally, the S&P 500 is down "only" 42% from its record highs.

That 42% drop doesn't come as a shock to anyone. With unprecedented government intervention and uncertainty about whether the economic cycle is broken for good, lower share prices only make sense.

But the way we got there -- with an even bigger plunge and a subsequent bounce -- is what people are focusing on. And that's the wrong focus.

The right thing to do
Long-term investors know better. They realize that over the long haul, it makes absolutely no difference whether stocks take a straight-line path down or take investors on a roller-coaster ride. The important thing is figuring out which stocks have solid business foundations and taking advantage of attractive valuations when they come to buy.

You might be tempted to wait until this silly-looking rally ends and share prices on your favorite companies fall back toward their lows. That may even turn out to be the right call. But if you play that timing game, you're doing exactly the same thing as the speculators you've criticized -- and if your stocks don't cooperate, you may miss out entirely on a huge opportunity. Just as Warren Buffett missed out on Wal-Mart because of a fraction of a point, you could miss the next big growth stock.

As we know well by now, markets will plunge and soar from time to time. But you don't have to get caught up in the hype. Stick with the investing strategy you've developed for your long-term goals -- it'll serve you better in the end.

For more on making the right moves with your investments, read about:

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Join Motley Fool co-founders David and Tom Gardner as they seek out attractive stocks every month in their Motley Fool Stock Advisor newsletter. You can try it out free for 30 days with no obligation.

Fool contributor Dan Caplinger bought a little in March, bought a little in April, and plans to buy a little in May. He doesn't own shares of the companies mentioned. Bare Escentuals is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Wal-Mart and USG are Motley Fool Inside Value recommendations. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Fool's disclosure policy pays attention to the right things.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 06, 2009, at 12:45 AM, SintUniversal wrote:

    Stock market goes zig zag down when it collapses, and zig zag up when it has bull run. This zig rally is too good to be true. Those who have bought in March should really take the hefty profit and stay put, waiting for the big zag down to buy lower. Different persons have different trading strategies. Personally, I think big swings of the market open immense opportunity whether it is a bear or a bull. Sitting in a sail boat with no wind is most frustrating. Most of us are not institutional buyers. So our golden rule is buy low and sell high. Holding a stock for long period is not necessarily wise because we do not have the tools to evaluate and monitor the company which can turn into a lemon when management and business environment change.

    .

  • Report this Comment On May 06, 2009, at 2:36 AM, blueheron999 wrote:

    You folks have been trashing this rally since it began. It probably will fizzle this week, but I've been unduly influenced by your trashing and dropped out earlier than I would have otherwise. As for the above, you are now taking back the dire predictions you just made. I suppose if the rally continues, you will soon post recommendations for how to enter it with skill. That's of course what an investor should do... but you won't take responsibility for the trashing you did that wasn't exactly accurate.

  • Report this Comment On May 06, 2009, at 12:48 PM, kyddfool wrote:

    I think you guys are way too confident relying on past performance for future growth. Took back the earnings for "all of 2009" ! this is only the first of May - hello...

    What about all the lost earnings of 2008!!!

  • Report this Comment On May 06, 2009, at 8:27 PM, stockjock43 wrote:

    Geeeez man.This guy may end up looking like a fool ( just like Cramer and Larry Kudow and Bove and all the damn pumpers in this very iffy market )

    he may be right also...but I am CAUTIOUSLY optimistic with stops in place on all my plays....have made soem serious cash on this rally bogus or not. Gotta go with the flow until the flow stops and reverses direction convincingly

  • Report this Comment On May 08, 2009, at 2:05 PM, AubieFool wrote:

    I think it bears noting that the S&P 500 net for the last 10 YEARS is roughly 0%. I'm not advocating day trading, but "buy and hold", unless you're buying some real dividend producers, is not the end-all be-all strategy you'd have us believe.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 891630, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/25/2012 8:06:54 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
LVS $47.92 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Las Vegas Sands Co… CAPS Rating: ***
ODP $2.21 Down -0.03 -1.34%
Office Depot CAPS Rating: *
USG $15.67 Down -0.18 -1.14%
USG Corp CAPS Rating: ***
IP $29.31 Down -0.31 -1.05%
International Pape… CAPS Rating: ***
BARE.DL $18.19 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Bare Escentuals CAPS Rating: ***
C $26.47 Down -0.19 -0.71%
Citigroup Inc CAPS Rating: ***
DOW $31.30 Down -0.25 -0.79%
The Dow Chemical C… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement