The Buy-and-Hold Strategy Is Going, Going, Gone ...

Recs

17

Disney Buys Marvel!

...And David Gardner called it. He's up 1,334%! See what David's recommending that you buy NEXT!

Click here now to find out!

It's been interesting to observe the zeal with which people have taken part in the Fool's debate about buy-and-hold investing. There have been many arguments in favor of buy and hold, some against, and some in between.

My view is that the buy-and-hold strategy is fading fast, right before our eyes. The days of holding onto a stock for 20 or 30 years and forgetting about it until retirement are over.

Thanks to technological advancements that enable far greater competition, as well as global economic uncertainty, the buy-and-hold approach just isn't effective in today's market. For example, consider a company like Sun Microsystems (Nasdaq: JAVA), which was riding high during the tech boom of the late 1990s. Investors at the time felt Sun would be a long-term buy given its significant tailwinds -- it was providing software and Internet equipment for the ever-growing World Wide Web.

But the tech bust, along with furious competition from IBM (NYSE: IBM) and Hewlett-Packard (NYSE: HPQ), dismantled Sun and its stock price. Although this is just one admittedly extreme example (Sun is down 85% over the past decade), it serves to remind us how critical it is to actively monitor stock investments to gauge when to make appropriate decisions to sell.

Several comments from our Foolish members support the view that buy and hold is rapidly fading. Here are a few interesting ones:

  • "Holding anything for a long period of time has never been a good idea, and even less so today. In our economic system, money moves rapidly and constantly, so while you're sitting on your money for a long period of time, a lot of people are using/moving your money and making big profits, and in the end you'll get a few scraps back after sitting on it for ten years. If a 8-12% return on your investment after several years seems good to you, then fine, but in reality it's a very paltry sum compared to what other made with your money in the same time period. And as many of you know, after ten years you may be even be down, not up." -- IMHarvey

  • "I vote YES. When I became a cognizant being in the 60's and 70's, BAH had a rather concrete meaning. You bought a stalwart American company, an engine of capitalism, like AT&T or GM or a utility. You held it forever; the rest of your life; until you die. When you retire, you harvest your crop.
    TMF seems to quote 10 years as a horizon, but I wonder if many journalists and everyday investors are thinking of 5 years; I know I do." -- jerryguru69

  • "In my opinion, the buy and hold days are over. That does not mean you should become a day trader, but modern technology is changing so fast that the probability that any one company is going to be the top dog forever is very low. I now set stop losses on every stock I buy and if it drops significantly it automatically sells. If it turns out I should have kept the stock, I can buy it back again for $7 on many on line sites. I will never again let my portfolio drop significantly based on predictions from so called stock experts, that on reality don't know any more than I do." -- harry1n

As with all great debates, both sides must be heard. Although I strongly hold the view that buy and hold is fading fast, some members provided evidence to the contrary:

  • "Coca-Cola (NYSE: KO), a blue-chip stock anyone with a 5th grade education can understand, is up over 9,000% over the last 35 years, yet more than 97% of the population missed the run. As recently as March 2009, this simple, yet very powerful stock was trading at a very reasonable 14 times earnings, yielding 4% in dividend income. This is the same PRICE Warren Buffett paid for it in 1989! (adjusted to 4 bucks a share, post splits). Yet, there were with NO takers!!!

    Truth be told, most people do NOT have the stomach, nor the patience for the stock market. You need both.

    If you are reading this post, are less than 45 years old, and do not smoke, then you are likely going to live for another 30-40 years. If history has taught us anything, over that kind of time horizon, a 50-60,000 handle on the DJIA is simply inevitable.

    Thus, the one thing all LONG TERM equity investors have in common is FAITH. For without faith, I would have tossed my Dow Chemical, General Electric, Harley Davidson (NYSE: HOG), McDonald's (NYSE: MCD), and Pfizer (NYSE: PFE) stock overboard a long time ago." -- daveandrae

Wherever you fall in the debate, you cannot ignore the fact that today's market is filled with volatility and uncertainty. Knowing this, investors must stay on top of their portfolios and actively track, follow, and yes, even manage, their holdings.

What's your take? Is buy and hold quickly fading or not? Leave us a comment below and let us know!

For all our buy-and-hold coverage:

Closed for 15 months – opening 10 days only! Get notified ahead of time as our expert portfolio manager invests $1 MILLION in the best opportunities from across The Motley Fool’s premium investment services. This is the first open since August 2008, by invitation only. Enter email below.

Peter Khanahmadi does not own shares of any of the companies mentioned in this article. Coca-Cola is a Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. Pfizer is an Income Investor pick. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 25, 2009, at 4:22 PM, mtghack wrote:

    Buy and hold, but not American companies. What's changed between the 60s-70s and today is that American companies are no longer working for the interest of shareholders. Rather, it is the management working for their own interest so they can keep their massive pay and bonuses. With complacent boards, it is incredibly easy to influence their own compensation while laying off ordinary workers under the pretense of creating shareholder value. As bad as it sounds, one has to invest where our dollars are going, where jobs are being offshored. That's where the growth is - emerging markets.

  • Report this Comment On June 25, 2009, at 4:47 PM, afarhat8 wrote:

    Why is this issue being presented as a choice between mutually exclusive strategies? Investors have the ability to get the information needed for overseeing their investments with a keystroke, and the ability to change their holdings for an immaterial fee (e*trade, ameritrade). So while today an investor should continually monitor his or her holdings, holding some long term, others short term, and never buying others to start with seems prudent. Hold Coke, sell Sun. And don't get stuck in an "either/or" mode.

  • Report this Comment On June 25, 2009, at 6:09 PM, shoalfree wrote:

    I do believe that there are some short-term buys, e.g., the financials because of the government's infusion of cash. I suppose it is a careless strategy to simply follow the money like that, but in the short term it does offer substantial returns to the investor. I am concerned as to where we will be five to ten years out . . .

  • Report this Comment On June 25, 2009, at 9:07 PM, jesse2159 wrote:

    After obtaining a degree in economics, working for a large bank for many years and retired from the US Treasury, I still cannot predict with any accuracy what a stock will do over the long term. (I'm not much better short term either) But, I'd say the easiest formula is to remember what GM did,...then do exactly the opposite. If competition is not being challanged, if unions make expensive demands, if the company is steadly losing market share year after year, if the company makes products no one wants, if the product becomes unreliable and the management has been stagnent,..... sell the stock.

  • Report this Comment On June 26, 2009, at 12:58 PM, BigOlDave wrote:

    Not "going, going..."

    Just GONE. Trade! Buy low and sell high. Not lowest or highest. But if you know your stock, you will know it's turned into a zombie or has a share price nearing a chartable peak -- SELL. Stay in cash until the same stock, or one you've watched carefully, is nearing a chartable trough -- plus fundamentals and data points to support your decision -- BUY.

    How hard is this to understand? If the market hasn't taught you this during the last 18 months, you're unteachable. Truely a fool.

    Dave

  • Report this Comment On June 26, 2009, at 3:38 PM, wuff3t wrote:

    So "This Time It's Different", eh? Again. I expect we have heard that and the "death of buy and hold" during every severe recession. Not so much a well thought-out intellectual shift as a symptom of the fear that a lengthy downturn and big losses brings.

    And yet economies recover, well-run companies continue to thrive, and people make money from investing in strong companies and holding. Let's at least wait a while before we dig the grave of buy-to-hold.

  • Report this Comment On June 26, 2009, at 3:46 PM, jmt587 wrote:

    Well said wuff3t.

  • Report this Comment On June 27, 2009, at 12:28 PM, whitelake wrote:

    Does everything have to be in the extreme? Buy or hold is an unnecessary either/or option. There are good stocks which one buys and holds for a reasonable time (reasonable depends upon the fundamentals) and other stocks one avoids totally. Anyone who holds a stock for years without checking on it regularly should not be in stocks. And anyone who buys and sells too often, too often loses out on potential profits. No buy or hold. Just learning as much as one can about stocks and other types of investments and investing (buying & selling)as wisely as one's current knowledge allows.

  • Report this Comment On July 15, 2009, at 9:37 AM, Classof1964 wrote:

    There is another aspect to buying & holding a decent stock. I bought American Home Products in 1973. It morphed through a number of phased ending up as Wyeth (WYE). I collected $15,934.00 in dividends through 2008. My basis is now $5.21. I also held Sun Microsystems at the other extreme. I did not invest any more in AHP or WYE and continued to look for new first rate long term holds (diversification). Some worked out; some like Sun can be used for stock losses now that I am receiving over $26,000 in capital gains as Pfizer buys WYE. Furthermore, with splits as one basis goes down, the dividend rate rises significantly.

  • Report this Comment On October 06, 2009, at 9:29 AM, loneranger83 wrote:

    I totally agree! Buy and hold has become the goto answer, and I think people hide behind it. How about this simple theory -- big money moves markets. We often hear that the price can tell us all we need to know. The question is, how to examine this number. <a href="http://www.stopbuyingthebull.com">StopBuyingtheBull.com</a> monitors the number of buyers and sellers in the market (keeping an eye on the big money through algorithms). They actually send you notifications to your email when you should buy, sell or hold based on this information.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 929009, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/9/2009 10:51:38 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Health-Care Reform: A Tale of Two Chambers

Related Tickers

11/9/2009 4:00 PM
HOG $27.07 Up +1.34 +5.21%
Harley-Davidson, I… CAPS Rating: **
PFE $17.43 Up +0.47 +2.77%
Pfizer, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
JAVA $8.24 Up +0.14 +1.73%
Sun Microsystems,… CAPS Rating: **
MCD $62.64 Up +0.92 +1.49%
McDonald's Corp CAPS Rating: ****
KO $55.48 Up +0.99 +1.82%
The Coca-Cola Comp… CAPS Rating: ****
HPQ $49.99 Up +0.83 +1.69%
Hewlett-Packard Co… CAPS Rating: ***
IBM $126.00 Up +2.51 +2.03%
International Busi… CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Writedown: A writedown is a non-cash expense that reduces the value of an asset on the balance sheet.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!