Insiders Behaving Badly. Again.

Recs

9

Be A Motley Fool Millionaire!

David Gardner's top pick took an epic run of 1,334%! See what he’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Is greed good? Do managements with "skin in the game" work harder to make shareholders wealthy?

These two seemingly unrelated investing truisms -- the first famously (if fictionally) espoused by Gordon Gecko in Wall Street, the latter a central tenet of our investing strategy at Motley Fool Hidden Gems -- were certainly called into question by events this week.

According to the Wall Street Journal, investors in Perot Systems (NYSE: PER) took a break from their cheering over Dell's (Nasdaq: DELL) buyout to boo one Reza Saleh. The employee of H. Ross Perot's family investment firm allegedly traded on advance knowledge of Dell's offer, "earning" $8.6 million in profit from buying call options prior to the deal's public announcement.

If illegal insider trading is proven, the affair will echo a pair of scandals we saw back in 2004, when unnamed parties used inside information first on Royal Bank of Scotland's (NYSE: RBS) buyout of Charter Financial, and then on General Electric's (NYSE: GE) purchase of InVision, to reap millions of dollars' worth of ill-gotten gains. Simultaneous with news of the Perot debacle, the Journal gave us an inkling of why Marvel Entertainment (NYSE: MVL) disagreed so strongly with investors who felt the company got a raw deal from Disney (NYSE: DIS).

Turns out, Marvel's CEO had a vested interest in this deal going through -- one even greater than you'd think from his 37% stake in the company. Just weeks after his company began discussing the deal with Disney, CEO Isaac Perlmutter wrangled himself another 1.27 million stock options -- options priced at as little as half the price Disney was willing to pay for them.

Naturally, Marvel management argues there was no impropriety (move along ... nothing to see here), and that Perlmutter was due for a bonus in any case. It also seems a bit strange that a man due to reap $1.4 billion from selling his company would jeopardize his reputation, and his freedom, just to stuff an extra $34 million in his wallet. But stranger things have happened. (Witness Steve Jobs and the Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) backdating scandal of 2007.)

What's it all mean to investors?
In a nutshell, it means this: We still believe investors are better off when managers have a stake in the success of the businesses they run. Perlmutter's (allegedly, always allegedly) sticky fingers notwithstanding, his sellout to Disney still promises to net investors an $11 profit on any shares they owned prior to Aug. 31. A CEO without any interest in the company might have been just as happy collecting a paycheck forever, and unwilling to entertain Disney's bid.

Now it's your turn to tell us what you think, Fool. Is insider trading a pure and unmitigated evil that destroys faith in "the system" and drives up the cost of mergers when insiders get paid off? Or is there perhaps a plus side to be found in insider trading? Scroll down to our comments board, and sound off.

“Make Big Money With Options” Motley Fool CFO Ollen Douglass recently made over $100,000 buying options on 7 well known stocks. Now we’re committed to turning his small fortune into a massive one! And we want you to join us! Enter your email address to hear more:

Fool contributor Rich Smith owns shares of Marvel. Marvel Entertainment, Apple, and Disney are Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks. Dell and Disney are Inside Value recommendations. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 25, 2009, at 5:15 PM, Bobsbigbrain wrote:

    Insider trading is stealing, pure and simple.

    Mr. Saleh stole from the other side of his options trade because he had inside information.

    One could make the case that insider trading could help run a stock up, but fair is fair, everyone should have the same information available to them before they make a trade.

  • Report this Comment On September 25, 2009, at 5:24 PM, mtopper wrote:

    "everyone should have the same information available to them before they make a trade..........".

    And do ya think that EVER happens?

  • Report this Comment On September 25, 2009, at 5:25 PM, fjose wrote:

    Stock options are fine. Buybacks are the evil. Unless a company is being raided at a ridiculously low price, buybacks are unconsionable. This is just one of those scratch my backs I scratch yours.

    Instead of buybacks there should be instead dividends. This way the interests of the chareholder and management are aligned.

  • Report this Comment On September 25, 2009, at 5:38 PM, demodave wrote:

    I'm with BBB, only I think the operative word is cheating and not stealing. Insider info is insider info. If I work for a company and feel confident that its valuation will improve, that's one thing, but if I know that a huge business deal is being negotiated, that's way different.

    Greed is not good. It has lead countless accountants and executives toward self-serving actions that ruin peoples lives. When I read the life-style change stories of bankers going from $200k to $50k to become school teacher, I worry for alll the jobless working class - regarless of lower, middle, or upper. Accountants, bankers, and many executive don't actually do anything. They just massage money and their crooked cronies.

  • Report this Comment On September 26, 2009, at 9:30 AM, CityWealth wrote:

    Small investors never learn...

    Look at the market the last 6 months, the market is rigged and we should all know that by now, if you are among the financial elite you are treated differently once you have money, it's basically a liscense to be free from the law.

    Even George soros who does halfway decent things with his money was convicted of insider trading.

    I'm all for insider trading if the wealthy insider is using the money to make the world a better place.

    http://www.nytimes.com/2006/06/14/business/worldbusiness/14i...

    I'd rather have someone like Soros make a killing and then spend it at his foundation @ soros.org

    Then some crappy wealthy person who gives nothing back to society.

    Lets all face it, if most people were in the position to make money they will always take the money. No one ever got rich by being completely honest, you have to know when to be honest and when to be dishonest.

    Think about your relationships with people, are you honest 100% of the time? Doubt it. So why should we expect people to be in financial transactions where the stakes are even higher then social harmony?

  • Report this Comment On September 27, 2009, at 4:59 AM, MADDOFF wrote:

    GREED IS GOOD. SAYS I.

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2009, at 1:46 AM, PEMBA1 wrote:

    It's obvious that insiders that work for a company have priviledged information and shareholders should be protected from abuse.

    I'm not sure how stock buybacks relate to this article from one of the comments, but buybacks are actually more tax friendly for shareholders because they are not subject to double taxation like dividends. In addition, stock buybacks also help to boost earnings per share and reduce shares outstanding; thus providing more value for shareholders.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 993456, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 12/2/2009 12:58:52 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

By The Motley Fool

Fool Search: Be GM's Next CEO!

Related Tickers

12/2/2009 12:43 PM
GE $16.01 Down -0.16 -0.99%
General Electric C… CAPS Rating: ****
MVL $52.44 Up +0.14 +0.27%
Marvel Entertainme… CAPS Rating: ****
PER $30.04 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Perot Systems Corp CAPS Rating: *
DELL $13.76 Down -0.08 -0.61%
Dell, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
RBS $11.24 Down -0.19 -1.66%
Royal Bank of Scot… CAPS Rating: **
AAPL $197.64 Up +0.67 +0.34%
Apple, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
DIS $30.63 Down -0.10 -0.33%
The Walt Disney Co… CAPS Rating: ****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Earnings Power Value: Earnings Power Value (EPV) is a valuation tool that was popularized by Bruce Greenwald, et al, in the book Value Investing: From Graham to Buffett and Beyond.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!