Deathbed Stocks Revisited

Recs

3

For more than a year, we've been chronicling companies that appear to be on their deathbeds. As we note, not every company will give up the ghost. But since that original column, quite a few have either disappeared entirely or seen huge drops in their share prices: Fannie Mae, Merrill Lynch, Lehman Brothers, Bear Stearns, Washington Mutual, and XM Satellite Radio, to name just a few.

We check for stocks that have drawn the lowest one-star rating from the 140,000-plus savvy investors in our Motley Fool CAPS community. Then we pair that information with various financial ratios, which flash like a neon sign if the end is near.

Now that a third of those original companies have gone under or otherwise vanished, lets take a look at some of those stocks we deemed to be on their deathbeds:

Stock

Price at First Appearance

Price Today

% Chg

Hawaiian Holdings

$4.19

$6.82

62.77%

MGIC Investment (NYSE: MTG)

$2.24

$4.28

91.07%

Regency Centers (NYSE: REG)

$35.75

$33.15

(7.27%)

Ryder System (NYSE: R)

$34.90

$42.31

21.23%

Vonage (NYSE: VG)

$1.14

$1.35

18.42%

Pulte Homes (NYSE: PHM)

$11.70

$9.66

(17.44%)

Dolan Media

$6.59

$12.78

93.93%

Eastman Kodak (NYSE: EK)

$6.33

$4.19

(33.81%)

General Growth Properties

$1.66

$4.15

150.00%*

Saks (NYSE: SKS)

$4.14

5.9

42.51%

*Filed for bankruptcy April 16, 2009; delisted from NYSE on April 22. (Currently trades on pink sheets.)

Unlike previous trips back in time, in which nearly all of the companies reported lower returns, this group that appeared in early December had mixed and sometimes divergent results. While Dolan Media and MGIC Investment both nearly doubled in value since their appearance, General Growth Properties sought the protection of bankruptcy courts; its stock now trades over the counter on the Pink Sheets. So let's look a little more closely to see whether we can ascertain why some of these companies were able to recover, while others with a seemingly similar dire outlook could not.

Whistling past the graveyard
I can understand the concept of doing more with less, but I can't seem to grasp Vonage's policy of seemingly getting less from doing more. The VoIP provider recorded a much wider loss of $54.6 million last quarter, even as its average revenue per customer -- an important industry metric -- rose 4% to $29.89. The company even boosted new subscriptions in the last six weeks of the quarter, to more than double the rate in the first seven weeks of the period, on the strength of its new Vonage World program.

However, revenue fell 2%; the company had a net loss of 50,000 customers from the second quarter, despite the new program's boost; and customer churn rose to 3.4%. Most curious of all, the company's loss was actually triggered by a rally in its share price. Apparently, one feature of some of its convertible bonds increased in value as the stock rose, forcing Vonage to take a non-cash charge of $63 million. This was the main driver behind the company's quarterly loss.

It seems like Vonage is improving -- but shareholders apparently aren't allowed to join in the fun. Investors are hardly convinced, since the stock is down 6% on the day.

Just 28% of the more than 1,500 CAPS members rating Vonage think it will outperform the market. Highly rated CAPS member leohaas doesn't see how giving away all your business for free is a workable business model, while Option1307 thinks its heyday is long past:

While I have used their service when I was living overseas a few yrs. ago, and was relatively happy with it, I have to agree with most around here that their time has come and past. The filled a small niche for a while, cheap VoIP (Voice over Internet Provider); however, Skype is now equally as good and is entirely free for anyone with an Internet connection. Thus, I don't see how Vonage can compete with that. They would have to completely switch their mode of operations, and I don't see that happeneing. This was a good idea, eventhough it was a short lived run.

Rattling the cage
We'll be back next week to identify more stocks that are leaving investors feeling ill. In the meantime, you can start your own research on these stocks on Motley Fool CAPS. Read a company's financial reports, scrutinize key data and charts, and examine the comments your fellow investors have made -- all from your favorite stock's CAPS page. Sign up today, absolutely free, and let us know whether you think a stock is headed for its demise.

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Rich Duprey does not have a financial position in any of the stocks mentioned in this article. You can see his holdings here. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 06, 2009, at 4:10 PM, dudeabydes wrote:

    You guys simply MUST stop recruiting your CAPS members from the ride lines at Six Flags. Leohaas, eagerly waiting for his chance on the Tigerland Teahouse, writes: "Free calling is not a winning business model."

    Neither is writing about companies without having a clue. Vonage isn't free. They charge $24.99/month, and they have close to 3mm subscribers who pay that. And their margins and ARPU are both either holding steady or improving.

    Over at the Enchanted Teacups, Option1307 chimes in: "Skype is now equally as good and is entirely free for anyone with an internet connection." Well, Skype isn't free if you're calling a non-Skyper---in other words, anybody with a phone number and not a user name. But it's interesting that one of the sixth-graders thinks that Vonage is toast because he wrongly believes it's free, while the other kid believes (wrongly) that a company with a recently validated multi-billion dollar value is a free service (in other words, exactly what the first child suggests is Vonage's big problem).

    What a muddle. Get these kids to the library and make 'em do their homework. No more theme park visits until their grades improve.

  • Report this Comment On November 06, 2009, at 5:16 PM, outnleftdave wrote:

    These "FOOLS" only seem to want you to believe what they decide to write and omit FACTS at will.

    Vonage was expected to show a (-05) loss and instead had a +.03 gain ....silly to mention anything as NON IMPORTANT as that fact.

    The DO make note of the churn rate at 3.4%, but failed again to mention the KNOWN OCT. churn rate was down to 3.0 % OOPS,..wouldn't want anyone to have a clear picture of the facts, got to keep up the image of misleading reporting.

    Q: Do you also write the MIS FACTS for the Street.com ? They seem to have the same agenda and quality of info.

  • Report this Comment On November 10, 2009, at 12:51 PM, barowsky wrote:

    Truly investment people should never make comment on the value of technology in technology stocks! Why, because they most often can't differentiate a light build from a server, much less IPT from the digital junk sold by Verizon, ATT, and the cheese/hype of SKYPE and other fad phone offerings.

    When you pick up a hand set in my house you would never realize you are on an IPT system.

    When I moved recently, over 40 miles from my previous residence, disconnected my IPT, arrived at my new residence, plugged my IPT device back into my broadband network, and never missed a call. WOW

    Then I didn't have to deal with any of the greedy, IP ignorant, capitalistic, federally protected telcos like ATT, and Verizon. (For which most of the US doesn't realize that every last dime paid for a telephone circuit goes straight to the bottom of their bulging pockets.)

    Why tell me why, would anyone not want to leave the telephone company for companies like Vonage, MagicJack, and many other true IPTs versus pouring money down the drain with Telcos.

    Granted investment people know when the balance sheets match the market expectations for profitability with a technology company, but PLEASE, don't tell me technology flaws of these companies Rich. You don't have the knowledge to communicate with even the general public on this.

    The actions the IPT vendors are taking continues to keep the telcos on their heels. You may be totally unaware of the package offerings being modified by the telcos to win back the people who have strayed from the traditional telco. What would make more sense is to understand if the telcos are re-growing their land line base, or are the end users dropping land lines all together, because they have a mobile phone, and are trying to save a few pennies to afford keeping their mobile service.

    There is so much more to the investigation of that simply ignorant comment on Vonage, then your very ignorant outlook.

    Wow, no wonder I don't invest by the knowledge of this sites comments. I would have lost more of my income then the technology crash put into the market!!

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1036268, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/20/2009 11:25:49 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:03 PM
REG $32.80 Down -0.03 -0.09%
Regency Centers Co… CAPS Rating: *
R $41.16 Down -1.06 -2.51%
Ryder System, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
VG $1.16 Down -0.04 -3.33%
Vonage Holdings Co… CAPS Rating: *
EK $4.01 Down -0.12 -2.91%
Eastman Kodak Comp… CAPS Rating: **
PHM $9.46 Down -0.36 -3.67%
Pulte Homes, Inc. CAPS Rating: *
SKS $6.71 Up +0.01 +0.15%
Saks, Inc. CAPS Rating: **
MTG $4.14 Down -0.26 -5.91%
MGIC Investment Co… CAPS Rating: *

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Nano cap: A nano cap is a company with relatively tiny market capitalization, generally below $50 million.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!