This Mistake Could Cost You a Fortune

Recs

5

Man, it has been a tough year -- and every time I think things are finally on the right track, something unexpected happens and derails my hopes yet again.

It's not what you think!
You might be assuming I'm talking about riding shares of Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) all the way to their all-time low, only to dump them there, and then watch them more than triple in value. Or maybe you think I'm talking about missing out on Freeport McMoRan's (NYSE: FCX) big rebound.

But I'm actually referring to something much more painful for me personally: watching my beloved Oklahoma Sooners drop more games in one season than they have in the past half-decade. Not to mention, lose just about every star they have to injury, including their Heisman-winning quarterback, Sam Bradford.

My grandfather played football for Oklahoma, and I've been a Sooners fan since I was old enough to walk, so I'll always be a Sooners fan -- no matter how bad things get. After all, in sports, sticking by your team through the ups and the downs is a virtue. Just ask any Green Bay Packers fan. (Believe it or not, I'm a Packers fan, too.)

Wall Street is a different ball game
For proof, just ask any longtime "fan" of:

Stock

10-Year Return

Bank of America (NYSE: BAC)

(30%)

Xerox

(67%)

Fifth Third Bancorp (Nasdaq: FITB)

(75%)

Sirius XM Radio (Nasdaq: SIRI)

(98%)

Data provided by Yahoo! Finance.

Or ask my fellow Fools Rich Greifner or Adam Wiederman. Or even ask Jim Cramer. In his book Real Money, Cramer reminds investors, "This is not a sporting event; this is money. We have no room for rooting or hoping."

Yet it happens all the time. Investing message boards are full of desperate investors who hope some cash-rich behemoth will come along and save their decades-old American superbrand. But as Circuit City investors found out, this is often a losing bet -- especially in this credit-strapped market.

Others ride stocks all the way into the ground because they're emotionally attached to the company's story, products, or management -- and meet with similarly dismal results.

I, for one, am sitting on a major loss in Clearwire. If we're being honest, the only reason I bought shares in the first place was because I liked that it was backed by Google, Comcast, and a handful of other tech heavyweights.

Ditch that loser!
One of the "20 Rules for Investment Success" from Investor's Business Daily is to "cut every loss when it's 8% below your cost. Make no exceptions so you'll avoid any possible huge, damaging losses."

To a sports fan, that advice might seem cruel and unusual, but it's actually good investment counsel. Or is it?

To find out, I dug through David and Tom Gardner's Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks. They often re-recommend a stock even after a big run-up -- or a sharp fall. I actually found three examples when breaking IBD's rule actually paid off big-time:

Stock Advisor Pick

Decline After Recommendation

Gain After Re-Recommendation

Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX)

23%

340%

Quality Systems

14%

1,146%

Dolby Labs (NYSE: DLB)

10%

120%

These weren't flukes, either
In his re-recommendation write-up for Netflix, David Gardner admitted, "We're currently sitting on a 23% loss." But he went on to say, "I think this is one cheap stock at $11, backed by a great management team that's going to create value for us going forward."

Note that he had well-thought-out reasons for owning the stock: "It remains first and best in a growing industry, creates convenience for millions of consumers, and is led by visionary management that markets aggressively." Netflix stock has risen 340% since then.

So when do you sell?
IBD's rule probably could have saved you a lot of pain last September.

In the process, though, you might have had to sell every stock in your portfolio (I certainly would have) and you may well have set yourself up to miss out on some truly massive gains as the market rebounded -- like me, with Goldman Sachs.

When it comes to knowing when to sell, investors have drastically different strategies. Many have hard-and-fast numerical rules -- which is at least part of the reason we saw many excellent businesses losing 5% or even 10% per day late last year.

Others -- like the Gardners -- stick to a more analytical and intellectual approach to determine when to recommend that their Stock Advisor subscribers sell a stock. So when do David and Tom Gardner consider dumping a stock? Primarily when they encounter:

  • Untrustworthy management.
  • Deteriorating financials.
  • Mergers, acquisitions, and spinoffs that could damage the business.

The debate rages on
Someone once said, "I have no problem knowing when to buy a stock, but if I just knew when to sell, I'd be a great investor."

Investors may never agree on when or why to sell a stock. That's why it's important to have an emotionless, well-thought-out strategy in place. If you don't, you may suffer major losses or miss out on massive gains.

For what it's worth, David and Tom Gardner rarely sell, and it works for them. Tom's average Stock Advisor pick is performing more than 36 percentage points better than a like amount invested in the S&P 500. Meanwhile, David's are performing 64 points better on average.

Now, I challenge you to use the comment box below this story to tell us what your strategy is, and how it held up through the brutal bear market.

And if you're curious to see what David and Tom are recommending now -- including their top two picks for new money -- you can join them at Stock Advisor absolutely free for 30 days.

In addition to all of the stock picks and research, you'll also get full access to exclusive members-only discussion boards, where you can swap thoughts about when to buy or sell a stock with thousands of other dedicated investors.

To learn more about this free, no-obligation 30-day trial, simply click here.

Already subscribed to Stock Advisor? Log in at the top of this page.

This article was first published Dec. 28, 2007. It has been updated.

Austin Edwards owns shares of Google and Clearwire. Dolby, Netflix, and Quality Systems are Stock Advisor picks. Google is a Rule Breakers pick. The Fool's disclosure policy is still struggling with the fact that Brett Favre now wears purple -- and beats the Packers while doing so.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 10, 2009, at 8:26 AM, pondee619 wrote:

    "David and Tom Gardner rarely sell," So, what is the average holding period of this investment letter? What has been its yearly turnover rate since inception? Why must we take your assertations on faith when it would be so easy to back up your claims with a few facts?

    There are lies, damned lies and statistics. I really don't care what the "Gain After Re-Recommendation" is if I have held the stock since its original recommendation. Why isn't that number provided?

    Perhaps if you stopped trying to sell papers and started acting like a writer, your stories would be of a higher quality. But I don't think that is your goal.

  • Report this Comment On November 10, 2009, at 9:59 AM, SIRIDoom wrote:

    Avoid Sirius

  • Report this Comment On November 10, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Fool wrote:

    Avoid SIRIDoom

  • Report this Comment On November 10, 2009, at 10:14 AM, SIRIDoom wrote:

    John Malone, ends up with a very nice collection of satellites bought cheaply during the bankruptcy.

  • Report this Comment On November 10, 2009, at 10:34 AM, ghostintheattic wrote:

    SIRIDoom = plagiarist

  • Report this Comment On November 10, 2009, at 10:45 AM, pmlang37 wrote:

    Toward year-end -- now -- late November and December, I review my portfolio of usually 20 - 25 stocks, to decide which is the least promising of the losers, and then sell it to harvest the tax loss. Over time, this gets rid of mistakes and lowers my taxes.

  • Report this Comment On November 10, 2009, at 11:11 AM, SIRIDoom wrote:

    SIRI Positive EBITDA? If it ever gets any...

    EBITDA, a term used by a Doomed CEO to lie to children with too much faith in a crook that rips off stock holders.

    Stock Scam, is a plan to take money from stock holders. Mel's plan announced December 08 backfired. Mel KarmaCook's scam plan to issue stock for debt payment and then rev-split was a scam.

    Quick and Dirty Merger Loan, a deal with Goldman Sachs to short millions out of stock holders. The deal provides GS a lean on shares that are used to barrow real shares in a short hedge on the merger loan. Again, a Scam.

    If your invested in the company the did these things, your getting the wrath of a good God...

    SIRI rev-split soon...

  • Report this Comment On November 10, 2009, at 11:41 AM, Bootluver wrote:

    Oh joy! More Motley BS about Siri..when? please when will this site go offline??? I am waiting the have my Dead Fools party....everyone is invited!

    Siri $3 in 2010

    Boots

  • Report this Comment On November 11, 2009, at 7:21 PM, ItAintCool wrote:

    S&P ups credit rating outlook of Sirius XM Radio

    * On 5:56 pm EST, Wednesday November 11, 2009

    NEW YORK (AP) -- A credit ratings agency on Wednesday raised its outlook on Sirius XM Radio Inc. and its subsidiaries, citing improving profitability.

    Standard & Poor's Ratings Services upped the company's credit rating outlook to "Positive" from "Stable." A "Positive" outlook means that Sirius XM's rating may be raised over the next six months to two years.

    S&P also affirmed the satellite radio company's B- corporate credit rating. The rating covers Sirius XM's overall creditworthiness and means the company currently can meet its financial obligations.

    Please MF, TS & SiriDouche keep badmouthing Siri. Every time you do, it just shows how blind you are at best, or at worst, deliberately biased to the point of manipulation.

  • Report this Comment On November 11, 2009, at 7:23 PM, ItAintCool wrote:

    S&P ups credit rating outlook of Sirius XM Radio

    * On 5:56 pm EST, Wednesday November 11, 2009

    NEW YORK (AP) -- A credit ratings agency on Wednesday raised its outlook on Sirius XM Radio Inc. and its subsidiaries, citing improving profitability.

    Standard & Poor's Ratings Services upped the company's credit rating outlook to "Positive" from "Stable." A "Positive" outlook means that Sirius XM's rating may be raised over the next six months to two years.

    S&P also affirmed the satellite radio company's B- corporate credit rating. The rating covers Sirius XM's overall creditworthiness and means the company currently can meet its financial obligations.

    Please MF, TS & SiriDouche keep badmouthing Siri. Every time you do, it just shows how blind you are at best, or at worst, deliberately biased to the point of manipulation.

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 1:23 PM, ItAintCool wrote:

    Funny isn't it? Legit, disinterested parties report on something positive about Siri and their improved credit rating and MF & TSC ignore it. Are they waiting enough time for the stock's upswing, so they can bash and short it again?

    10 Articles about from TSC bashing Sirius come out on the same day, and Cramer and his netcaster flunkie half-heartedly say nobody knows what the other reproters were going to write. BS! You don't think that Cramer set the agenda to his writers?

    So how many days until MF & TSC start their Siri bashing again? I give it until today after the markets close and Siri has gone up to .66 or .67, then the negative articles will start trolling in.

    Any other guesses?

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1038325, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/21/2009 11:40:54 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
BAC $16.09 Up +0.01 +0.06%
Bank of America Co… CAPS Rating: ***
GS $170.01 Down -2.82 -1.63%
Goldman Sachs Grou… CAPS Rating: ***
FCX $84.57 Down -0.15 -0.18%
Freeport-McMoRan C… CAPS Rating: ****
NFLX $59.97 Down -0.29 -0.48%
Netflix, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
FITB $9.97 Down -0.08 -0.80%
Fifth Third Bancor… CAPS Rating: **
SIRI $0.63 Down +0.00 -0.03%
Sirius XM Radio CAPS Rating: **
DLB $43.28 Up +0.33 +0.77%
Dolby Laboratories… CAPS Rating: *****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Return on equity: Return on equity (ROE) is a measure of how much in earnings a company generates in a time period compared to its shareholders' equity. It is typically calculated on a full-year basis (either the last fiscal year or the last four quarters).

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!