Who's Watching the Bankers?

Recs

6

One bank overseer, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., used to have a program qualifying supposedly stronger banks for reduced scrutiny. On the FDIC's list of failed banks -- along with IndyMac, Washington Mutual (now part of JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM), and many others in the past two years -- you'll find at least three lenders that qualified for this so-called Merit exam.

In its story, Bloomberg has this quote from Colleen Kelley, president of the union representing the examiners:  

Substituting Merit exams for full-scope examinations made it less likely that FDIC employees would be in a position to see if a previously strong bank was beginning to slide in the wrong direction.

How should the government use its discretion in keeping watch over banks? The Merit exams were directed at smaller banks, but regulation is increasingly top of mind as bank mergers have made the previously too-big-to-fail JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) even bigger.

Scroll down and sound off in the comments box below about what the best way is to match the wants and needs of the public and the banks with limited government resources.

“The Next Great Investment”… That’s how a top global investor describes India’s potential. On Nov. 28, The Motley Fool’s Tim Hanson returns to India to prove it. Follow along in real time and get his TOP pick first (Hanson returned from China in July with a stock that’s up 169%!). Enter email below.

Kris Eddy does not own shares of any stocks mentioned in this article. The Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 10, 2009, at 1:13 PM, lution wrote:

    nothing should be "too big to fail." If any business has gotten that big, the regulators have already failed at their jobs.

  • Report this Comment On November 10, 2009, at 7:44 PM, DDHv wrote:

    <i>nothing should be "too big to fail."</i>

    Also nothing should be too good to examine. How about randomly timed examinations for all, with a variation in probability of examination based on merit. And the merit level should change whenever an exam indicates a change in quality.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1039405, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/24/2009 1:14:29 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
Live Chat on India, China, and the Demise of the Dollar

Related Tickers

11/24/2009 12:58 PM
BAC $16.22 Down -0.08 -0.46%
Bank of America Co… CAPS Rating: ***
JPM $42.32 Down -0.96 -2.21%
JPMorgan Chase & C… CAPS Rating: ***
WFC $27.69 Down -0.38 -1.35%
Wells Fargo & Comp… CAPS Rating: ***

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Burn rate: Burn rate is the speed at which a company spends shareholder capital, depleting its cash reserves.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!