Cutting the Cords on Golden Parachutes

Recs

13

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 1,334%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Following his company's recently announced merger with Stanley Works (NYSE: SWK), departing Black & Decker (NYSE: BDK) CEO Nolan Archibald was entitled to a $20.5 million golden parachute on his way out the door. To nearly everyone's surprise, he's turning down that little perk. That's exciting news for any investors outraged by golden parachutes.

These well-padded parting gifts often ensure that CEOs draw handsome rewards for even the most miserable failures. Before its buyout by Bank of America (NYSE: BAC), Merrill Lynch's Stan O'Neal vacated the brokerage's top spot with a $161.5 million farewell. And Bob Nardelli left Home Depot (NYSE: HD) in a mess, but still collected $210 million for his efforts. Perverse incentives like these have led great investment thinkers such as Berkshire Hathaway's (NYSE: BRK-A) (NYSE: BRK-B) Warren Buffett to question corporate America's compensation habits.

Thankfully, Archibald's not alone in forgoing one last feed at the shareholder trough. Last year, Aflac's (NYSE: AFL) CEO Dan Amos similarly said that if he's booted, he won't accept any sort of gilded bailout.

That said, as heartening as Archibald's gesture is, he won't exactly leave the CEO chair unrewarded. He'll be staying on at the combined company as executive chairman of the board of directors, and he'll earn $1.5 million every year, with the possibility of a $1.9 million annual bonus. Add on stock options, a Black & Decker pension of $35.5 million, $15.7 million in a supplemental retirement plan, a "cost synergy bonus" of $45 million if cost-cutting efficiencies are achieved, and ... well, you get the drift.

Still, he could have taken a $20.5 million golden parachute on top of all that. It may not be the biggest sacrifice, but perhaps Archibald's refusal to take this extra payout signals the first stirrings of some broader shift in CEOs' consciences. And Archibald, at least, is departing after a long and successful tenure, having won praise for turning Black & Decker around when he arrived in the 1980s. Going out in a successful merger is hardly a shameful fate.

I'm glad to see that some executives will turn down golden parachutes, knowing that they're already getting more than enough in salary, bonuses, and assorted other goodies. Still, shareholders should remember that even when a CEO refuses one hefty payday, he or she may still be collecting plenty of others.

Is Archibald's move magnanimous, or slightly disingenuous? Is it a step in the right direction, or just an empty public relations gesture? What do you think of golden parachutes overall? Let us know in the comment boxes below.  

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Weekly by entering your email below.

Berkshire Hathaway and Aflac are Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks. Berkshire Hathaway and Home Depot are Motley Fool Inside Value picks. The Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Alyce Lomax does not own shares of any of the companies mentioned. The Fool's disclosure policy keeps its feet firmly planted on the ground.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 11, 2009, at 5:25 PM, yaiya100 wrote:

    Your article states it clearly: Archibald's move is disingenuous and an empty public relations gesture. A few million a year will attract lots of smart people.

    Investors are being ripped off by these companies board of directors. I hope the government steps in and stops these ridiculous pay checks and pay outs.

  • Report this Comment On November 11, 2009, at 6:58 PM, johnwlynn wrote:

    I don't understand yaiya's hatred - or misunderstanding of the the business world. If I look at the market cap of $3.71B - and used the closing price, I show there should be about 60M shares of stock. And if that's the case, and I look back 1 1/2 years...I see that the stock price went from a low of $20.87 to close at $62.25 - that's an increase of about $41.50 a share...that means the value that this company grew by was nearly $2.5B! That's all money that they shareholders made. So while you say investors are being ripped off - I am astounded that you would say that paying someone $20M when he helped lead shareholders to see stock appreciation of $2.5B is a ripoff...had he taken it he would have gotten only .8% of the total value he created! Now who is getting ripped off?

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 1:56 AM, Wacka5A wrote:

    I don't think johnwlynn understands the concept of employment. Both legally and morally Archibald was employed to increase the value of the company and returns to the shareholders. He was guaranteed a salary succeed or not, it was the shareholders who carried the risk.

    It is reasonable to expect a bonus for exceptionable results but it should not be mandatory to provide one, especially as many execs fail miserably to carry out their side of the contract successfully.

    Is it a futile gesture? Probably. The concept getting as much as you can with as little effort as possible seems ingrained in corporate society. Greed always wins.

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 10:07 AM, 7351jay wrote:

    Nardelli of Home Depot and lately Chrysler, should be shunned. A very good method used by the Amish for people of questionable morals and ethics. I am surprised there isn't a raft of law suits against him!

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 2:02 PM, cordwood wrote:

    The "store owners" should be entrusted w/ its operational guidance not the employees nor government.

    Until we have a comprehensible tax mechanism it becomes nothing other than a crap shoot to determine who/what is responsible for the shenanigans.

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 6:35 PM, Fool wrote:

    Right on alexismachine...

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1040469, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 11/21/2009 2:04:47 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

The Must-Read Story on Fool.com
An Open Letter to the Federal Reserve

Related Tickers

11/20/2009 4:00 PM
BAC $16.09 Up +0.01 +0.06%
Bank of America Co… CAPS Rating: ***
BRK-A $103250.00 Down -645.00 -0.62%
Berkshire Hathaway… CAPS Rating: *****
HD $27.18 Up +0.07 +0.26%
The Home Depot, In… CAPS Rating: ***
AFL $44.10 Up +0.26 +0.59%
Aflac, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
BRK-B $3447.00 Down -3.00 -0.09%
Berkshire Hathaway… CAPS Rating: *****
BDK $61.00 Down -0.07 -0.11%
The Black & Decker… CAPS Rating: ***
SWK $48.95 Down -0.32 -0.65%
The Stanley Works CAPS Rating: **

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Delisted stock: A delisted stock is one whose fundamentals no longer meet the requirements of the NYSE or the Nasdaq.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!