Predictions From the Man Who Called the Housing Meltdown

Blame for the financial crisis falls at the feet of many. The Fed kept interest rates too low for too long. The likes of Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) , Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS  ) , Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS  ) , and Merrill Lynch (now owned by Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) , which itself owns some blame) were leveraged to the hilt, and they cheerfully sliced and diced mortgages into risky mortgage-backed securities.

Then there were the credit rating agencies. Moody's (NYSE: MCO  ) et al. tacked misleading ratings onto the securities, providing a totally false sense that they were safe. To top it all off, AIG (NYSE: AIG  ) "insured" the risky securities with credit default swaps … which turned out to be toxic.

But at the core of the crisis is the housing market. And while that market has shown some signs of recovery recently, the sustainability of that recovery remains in question. Lately, shares of homebuilders like Pulte Homes (NYSE: PHM  ) and Toll Brothers (NYSE: TOL  ) mirror that uncertainty.

To gain some insight into the state of the housing market, I spoke with the man who had the foresight to call the housing bust: Robert Shiller. Shiller is a Yale finance and economics professor, the co-creator of the S&P/Case Shiller Home Price Index, and author of numerous books, the most recent being Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism.

Shiller is not certain the housing market has bottomed, and says he thinks home prices could fall back. He predicts that housing prices will be much more volatile going forward, and that five years from now, home prices will probably be at about the same level they are today. What follows is an edited transcript of our conversation.

Jennifer Schonberger: What is your take on the state of the housing market now? Are you worried?

Robert Shiller: With the housing market, it's really hard to tell because we've had a huge recovery in the housing market. Prices are going up rapidly now. … It's going up so solidly at the moment. But on the other hand it all looks risky, too. So I think we could see new lows in home prices.

Schonberger: So, then, you think there could be a “double dip” in housing prices?

Shiller: Probably nothing dramatic. The most likely scenario is that we might lose some ground in the housing market, but not a whole lot. Housing prices haven't shown that much business cycle correlation. Housing prices in real terms didn't do a lot in the Great Depression, and they were actually rising in the later Depression.

So I just don't see any clear path for housing prices. My best guess is that they might stay around where they've been in the last few months. They might go up for a while, then come down and stay level.

Schonberger: Then the housing market has not bottomed?

Shiller: No. There's a substantial chance it bottomed, but it's really still uncertain.

Schonberger: Where do you see home prices five years from now?

Shiller: We have a market for home prices that we've launched on the NYSE in June. It's market UMM and DMM. We have a website, Macromarkets, that translates the price in that market to a forecast for home prices in five years. It's been predicting modest increases -- basically no change in five years.

Schonberger: So you're expecting prices to stay stagnant for the next five years?

Shiller: Well, our UMM market tells us the point in five years. It doesn't tell us what will happen on the way. Right now, home prices are rising pretty fast. So, taking that fact into account, a plausible scenario would be that prices rise for some more months and then drop back, but not a huge drop back, so that they end up about where they are [now] in five years.

That seems plausible to me, given historical experience that we went through the biggest bubble in home-price history. Historically, home prices have not shown so much volatility and have not shown such a correlation with the business cycle. So, looking at that, I suspect home prices just won't do a lot over the next five years.

On the other hand, if you look at the housing market, the fact that we went through this enormous bubble suggests that people have gotten more speculative about housing. It didn't used to be considered a speculative market. It was home. It used to be widely believed that home prices were widely driven by construction costs, and those have been stable through time.

We've gotten to think of them as speculative, and that means we may make them behave speculatively. So I think that volatility of home prices may be higher than [it was] in the past. That's why I think it's still worrisome that home prices could fall and set new lows. That is not my preferred scenario, but I could certainly see that happening.

Schonberger: What are one or two economic indicators that you look at to gauge the health of the economy?

Shiller: First, I look at confidence indexes: the Conference Board and the Michigan indices. Those are very important because they're basic indicators of animal spirits. I also have my own investor confidence index through Yale. It's called crash confidence, which is confidence there won't be a stock market crash. That has fallen quite a bit recently. So there was less confidence in the market.

I also look at data on homebuyers' attitudes that I collect with my co-author, Karl Case. We have been looking at our own data on homebuyers' expectations, and we have found that expectations have come down since the peak in the housing market.

We've found expectations for future home price growth for one year have changed dramatically. Last year, they were expecting price declines, now they're expecting modest price increases over the next year. Expectations for prices in 10 years are fairly stable.

The 10-year expectations have me thinking that there could be a good period of rising home prices. I just don't think it will be boom years. Even though it looks like the beginning of a boom, I don't believe it. It might be a period of modest growth. I don't see the kind of enthusiasm [that's needed for a boom].

Schonberger: You mentioned that you think that speculation is going to become ingrained in the housing market going forward, maybe for the next five years or so. What lessons should we have taken from the housing-market bust? And have we learned our lesson, given that you think that speculation is going to be inherent going forward?

Shiller: Well, I thought the lesson that we should have taken was that housing was a risky investment and that we should be wary of putting all of our savings into a leveraged investment like that. We should have learned that there are over 15 million households underwater, with mortgages higher than the value of the home.

What I would like to see happen is some change in our institutions that helps protect people against this kind of mistake in the future. I have a proposal in my book, Subprime Solutions, in which I propose a different kind of mortgage called a continuous workout mortgage.

This is a mortgage that has a preplanned workout built into the initial mortgage. This is analogous to the "wind-down plans," or corporate living wills, for corporations. Corporations should have a plan for what happens if they go bankrupt. Similarly, I think there should be a plan for households when economic conditions turn ugly and that should be planned out and written into a contract in the mortgage.

This is the kind of thinking that I'm hopeful we'll get around to before this crisis goes on too many more years. I'm hopeful that we can move ahead to a better kind of mortgage that will make things normalized in the future.

Stay tuned for more of our interview with professor Shiller tomorrow on Fool.com.

For related Foolishness:

Fool contributor Jennifer Schonberger owns shares of Bank of America, but does not own shares of any of the other companies mentioned in this article. Moody's is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor and Motley Fool Inside Value recommendation. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (10) | Recommend This Article (39)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 11, 2009, at 1:37 PM, VegasMartin wrote:

    What about Peter Schiff? He should be given credit for calling the housing bubble. He told us this would all come crashing down in 2006 and everyone laughed in his face. They should have listened.

    http://www.ShootTheBears.com

  • Report this Comment On November 11, 2009, at 2:46 PM, RHaganC wrote:

    5 year predictions are just stupid; let's go back 5 years and see what people were saying 2010 would look like in 05. If they were right, it was mostly LUCK. If they were wrong, then DEFINATELY stop listening to them.

    there are too amny dynamics that play into every event.

    As for THIS guy being the only predictor? TALEB......HELLLOOOOOOO! Miss giving him the cred. You should interview HIM. Get on it fools! ;)

  • Report this Comment On November 11, 2009, at 5:16 PM, lurome wrote:

    The Fool's identified a number of firms and organizations that contributed to the financial melt down in the housing market BUT OMITTED any reference to Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. I hope this was not a POLITICAL STATEMENT!!!!!!

  • Report this Comment On November 11, 2009, at 5:54 PM, YingandYang wrote:

    This "CRASH" was a fix by the Banks and Federal

    Reserve as was the S*&*L Crisis to eliminate

    '

    competition *&* give 43% of Home market to BofA

    *&* Wells.

    Predicted by Pres. Thomas Jefferson once we got a

    Central Bank/Federal Reserve.

    He said the Banks would Rape Americans of

    everything they own (Including their "Heritage") and

    enslave them. (Just what has *&* Is "Happening"

    Wake up-!!

  • Report this Comment On November 11, 2009, at 7:08 PM, xetn wrote:

    Let me get this straight; this guy predicted a housing bubble and now believes the "worst" part of the correction in house prices is behind us? If it is true that one of the main causes of the housing bubble is due to Fed policy (and government interventionist policies, such as ACORN) and those policies are still in effect, why would you suspect the correction is mostly behind us? The only moderating influence on housing prices has been more government interventions such as foreclosure preventions and the "1st time home buyer" program. Meanwhile, the Fed is still on a monetary inflation tare with, what amounts to, negative interest rates.

    As already mentioned, Shiller is not the only one who "called" the housing bubble; Mises.org had several economists that did and as a result of Ludwig von Mises' famous "Austrian trade cycle theory" even predicted the great depression. Just for grins, that theory proclaims that all boom/busts are a result of monetary inflation (creating money out of thin air or fractional-reserve banks creating the same via credit inflation). This theory has predicted most (if not all) of cycles since.

    Then there is Gerald Celente, founder of Trends Research, who has predicted:

    http://www.trendsresearch.com/forecast.html

    Maybe you should have a conversation with him?

  • Report this Comment On November 12, 2009, at 2:09 PM, dymty wrote:

    I said in '07 it would take ten years of flat housing prices to bring them in line with where they would have gone to if the rates hadn't been kept so low, enticing the speculation that caused prices to inflate.

    So, 2017, not 2014.

  • Report this Comment On November 13, 2009, at 3:24 AM, 1phenom wrote:

    Shiller is no genius. I lived in the socialist state for over 30 years and any educated person did not need a Shiller to tell them what was going on.

    I lived in an upscale neighborhood in a 1,500 sq. ft. home that I bought for $300k in 2000. In 2005 it was up to $670k. I sold in 2006 for $550 because I wanted to get out before the bottom.

    Why did I see this coming? I saw couples moving in with all the toys, one or both working, some with kids. My real estate agent and trusted friend gave me some data. Most of the home buyers at that time could only qualify with both working, took 3 & 5 year arms and no interest loans.

    This was the powder keg that I saw coming and did not need Shiller.

    Your experts are your fools who have been there and continue to be ahead of the curve and many of the so-called experts.

  • Report this Comment On November 13, 2009, at 3:25 AM, 1phenom wrote:

    Sorry, the socialist state of California.

  • Report this Comment On November 13, 2009, at 6:33 PM, cissefey wrote:

    Ditto, Peter Schiff and Mises.org. Give credit where due.

  • Report this Comment On November 13, 2009, at 11:41 PM, RetiredSurgeon wrote:

    "Those who know nothing, predict. Those who predict, know nothing." "Predicting a market is what makes astrology respectable." I didn't make these up, Other wiser people did from long ago. I'm just wise enough to listen.

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1040242, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/2/2014 10:48:38 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement