Recs

8

These Stocks Are Trash!

A few years ago, I was sledding with my wife in her hometown of Virginia Beach when I heard someone yell "Whooooooo, Mount Trashmore!" as he soared down the snowy hill. Thoroughly confused, I turned to my wife and asked, "Mount Trashmore -- what the heck is that?"

A dirty trick
I soon found out that Mount Trashmore is a landfill being put to new uses. In winter, covered in snow, it just looked like a great place to go sledding. In the spring, it becomes a park crowded with residents using basketball and volleyball courts, enjoying the rolling green hills, and climbing the hiking trails that surround a beautiful lake.

But underneath it all -- it's just three miles of trash!

Why should you care?
If you think about that situation, it seems eerily similar to the stock market.

Consider this: How many times do you see a share price shoot up and think to yourself, "Wow, that must be a great company"? Then, after doing some research, you find out the business is drowning in debt and hasn't made money in years.

Look at Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac -- both companies have experienced substantial prices increases over the past six months. Those are incredible returns! But what's more incredible is that they were recipients of over $50 billion in taxpayer bailout money, both companies suffer from sloppy management, and both are expected to post huge losses for 2009. Rising prices can make companies look good on the surface -- just like Mount Trashmore looked good to me -- but when you take a closer look, they're simply trash.

Take a look at some of this junk:

Company

6-Month
Price Increase

Total
Debt-to-Equity Ratio

3-Year Annualized Revenue Decline

Forward
Price-to-Earnings Ratio

Landry's Restaurants

99%

300%

(1%)

45

Dana Holding (NYSE: DAN  )

360%

46%

(15%)

62

Brigham Exploration (Nasdaq: BEXP  )

196%

304%

(15%)

55

Data from Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

These stocks have seen astronomical gains in the past six months, but they're trading at ridiculously high valuations, they're riddled with debt, and their businesses are struggling during the recession. But after posting negative returns over the past three years, they're seeing spikes in their prices as if they are about to enjoy tremendous earnings growth for several years.

Some of these companies may have been smart picks once upon a time, but if you have them in your portfolio right now, I'd take your gains and toss the stocks in the incinerator as fast as you can.

Don't be fooled
In actuality, Mount Trashmore isn't such a bad thing. It employs the best possible use of urban land by combining recreation with waste management.

But stocks like the ones above don't serve a purpose anymore. They are deceptive because of their extraordinary returns and often push you along with a herd of other investors who are concerned only about short-term price movements. Think about the influx of speculative money that has gone into emerging markets in the past year -- many are calling it a bubble that's going to burst. Much of the inflow into developing markets has helped foreign stocks like Vale (NYSE: VALE  ) and SunTech Power Holdings (NYSE: STP  ) experience a great surge in share price. Not to say that the bump in price hasn't been warranted for these two companies; however, following "hot" money hardly sounds like a practical investing strategy.

Instead of following the pack or keeping stocks in your portfolio that clearly don't belong, why not try a simpler, more levelheaded approach? Look for companies that have clean balance sheets and limited debt, that have strong positions in their competitive landscape, and that are trading at favorable valuations.

That's what Motley Fool co-founders David and Tom Gardner do at Motley Fool Stock Advisor. They recommend companies like Hasbro (NYSE: HAS  ) , Cubic (NYSE: CUB  ) , and inVentiv Health (Nasdaq: VTIV  ) .

Each of these companies has very manageable debt; all three have substantially increased revenues over the past five years. Cubic, under the leadership of their 94-year-old (yes, 94!) founder and chairman, has been an electronic innovator for years. Having developed the first-ever electronic stadium scoreboard in 1966, the company has continued in its tradition by being a leader in providing systems support for the military. But don't worry about any future defense-budget decreases -- this company doesn't produce tanks or planes, it's strictly involved with training, development, and support. Cubic has also increased its earnings on an annualized basis by over 7% for the last five years.

Hasbro, one of the leading makers of toys such as Iron Man and Spider-Man, has a dominant position in the game and toy market. It not only produces historical and time-honored games for children, but also has a deep catalog of intellectual property that will help it earn revenues for decades to come. Most recently, Hasbro has partnered up with Discovery Communications to create an entertainment network for children and families that is sure to complement its existing product lines. Over the last three years, the company has averaged a return on equity of 22%.

If you're having a difficult time separating the trash stocks from the good ones, our Motley Fool Stock Advisor newsletter is a great place to start. David and Tom Gardner offer two stocks every month they'd be happy to own for years, and there are currently 10 stocks they think you should buy right now. If you're interested, click here for a free 30-day trial. There's no obligation to subscribe.

Already a member of Stock Advisor? You can log in at the top of this page.

Fool editor Jordan DiPietro owns shares of Hasbro. Cubic, Hasbro, and inVentiv Health are Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations. inVentiv Health is a Motley Fool Hidden Gems pick. Suntech Power Holdings is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers pick. The Fool owns shares of inVentiv Health and Hasbro. The Fool has a competitive but prudent disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 16, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Fool wrote:

    "...and their businesses are struggling during the recession." for BEXP? Really? Are you smoking crack? They are proving up the biggest oil field in the country. Wake up before you write...

    Take it from a writer.

  • Report this Comment On December 16, 2009, at 6:43 PM, Fool wrote:

    Regarding Brigham Exploration, your need to revist. You apparently are not aware of the action in the field..

    Who is the fool. Time will tell.

  • Report this Comment On December 16, 2009, at 7:00 PM, mbtx wrote:

    What date did you use for BEXP's debt to equity ratio? They raised over $100 million in an equity less than 60 days ago and have been hitting home runs in the Bakken.

  • Report this Comment On December 16, 2009, at 8:33 PM, Incredulous57 wrote:

    Is this even ethical? "Fool editor Jordan DiPietro owns shares of Hasbro. Cubic, Hasbro, and inVentiv Health ."...and you have the sounding board to tout them. Conversely I'll assume you're short or missed DAN and BEXP.

  • Report this Comment On December 16, 2009, at 10:23 PM, awdaniels wrote:

    Jordan Dipietro, your comment about bexp being trash is out of bounds as of Dec. 16, 2009. You completely missed the boat and by next July 2010, I expect you to write a follow up article with an apology as to how wrong you are and the market looks ahead not behind and the management of bexp should receive a call from you and find out what their guess is for the future. I own bexp and look forward to some good reading.

  • Report this Comment On December 17, 2009, at 4:55 AM, Fool wrote:

    The devil is always in the detail. A close look at the reality of bexp,s well ips against actual well performance and their well cost structue is the true tale of the tape. The fool is right--underneath the snow at bexp's Williston basin well locations is trash.

    Devil Hunter

  • Report this Comment On December 17, 2009, at 3:25 PM, BLH1952 wrote:

    Here is another self-proclaimed "expert" on companies based upon the little boxes of information you see on sites such as MSN. These boxes may give you some information, but certainly do not tell you enough to call a company "trash" or "junk" in a published article. BEXP has completely changed its focus from gas to oil and has been agressively drilling in the Bakken/Three Forks formations. It now has three rigs running and drills, completes, and tests a well in a 60 day time period. Therefore, every two months should have reports on three wells that BEXP has an interest. This company has issued stock and assigned partial interests in wells in order to fund its drilling. As its revenue increases, its long term debt stays the same or decreases. With a little patience, the drilling campaign should make this company quite successful. BEXP also has several gas leases and wells when it was placing its emphasis on gas production. As gas goes up, this source of revenue should not be overlooked. Best regards to all readers.

  • Report this Comment On December 18, 2009, at 1:07 PM, Fool wrote:

    The Fool missed the boat on BEXP & is trashing. Using this forum in this manner is highly suspect. Encouraging owners of this to dump, drive price down & buy it lower, just makes me want to take a stronger position losing street cred Fool.

  • Report this Comment On December 18, 2009, at 4:02 PM, Fool wrote:

    52-week high today - that speaks for itself.

    Who you gonna trust RayJay or Fool?

    'nuff said. The proof is in the tape.

  • Report this Comment On December 19, 2009, at 10:48 PM, phoebe44 wrote:

    Seen the recent update on Dana from JP Morgan?

  • Report this Comment On December 22, 2009, at 2:24 AM, investmentbuddy wrote:

    Hmm. The InvestmentBuddy.com bought a few shares at $2.01 less than a year ago that is working out pretty good. We have sold about half of our position on the way up to the top of Mount Trashmore. We were concerned about the additional stock issued, but it looks like it is fueling more growth. If the natgas price ever spikes again, $10 - $12, it could be the retirement plan.

  • Report this Comment On December 29, 2009, at 9:41 PM, Fool wrote:

    You missed it with BEXP...you need to understand Energy stocks!

  • Report this Comment On January 04, 2010, at 12:07 PM, hegralow wrote:

    I am glad I did not take your advice to sell my Bexp stock as you advised. It opened at 12.87 on the 16th of December and is up to 14.91 today so far Not bad for only about ten trading days. Which one of the Fool;s picks are up that far since your article?

  • Report this Comment On January 05, 2010, at 11:33 AM, Fool wrote:

    Do some science about BEXP technology. USA needs oil.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1068491, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/11/2012 3:08:15 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 4 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,801.23 -89.23 -0.69%
S&P 500 1,342.64 -9.31 -0.69%
NASD 2,903.88 -23.35 -0.80%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/10/2012 4:00 PM
HAS $36.84 Up +0.25 +0.68%
Hasbro CAPS Rating: *****
STP $4.03 Down -0.15 -3.59%
Suntech Power Hold… CAPS Rating: ***
VTIV.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
inVentiv Health CAPS Rating: *****
BEXP.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Brigham Exploratio… CAPS Rating: ***
CUB $49.00 Down -0.66 -1.33%
Cubic CAPS Rating: ****
DAN $15.26 Down -0.20 -1.29%
Dana Holding Corp. CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement