5 Stocks Making Cash

Recs

14

Disney Buys Marvel!

David Gardner called it. He’s up 868%! See what David’s recommending that you buy NEXT.

Had Jerry Maguire been an investor instead of a fictional sports agent, he might have become famous for yelling, "Show me the cash flow!"

Earnings come and go, and the green-eyeshade types can legally manipulate it to mask a company's true operations. Yet its ability to generate cash -- what comes in the register and goes out the door -- remains the pre-eminent indicator of company's worth. In short, cash is king.

Below, we'll look at companies that have proven to be prodigious generators of free cash flow (FCF) -- the amount of money a company has left over that it could pay to its investors. We'll find companies with compounded free cash flow growth rates exceeding 25% annually over the past five years, then pair them with opinions from some of the more than 145,000 members of Motley Fool CAPS to see which ones might have the best chance of outperforming the market.

Company

Levered FCF 5-Year CAGR, %

CAPS Rating
(out of 5)

Chesapeake Energy (NYSE: CHK)

33.6%

*****

Dynamic Materials (Nasdaq: BOOM)

102.9%

*****

Ebix (Nasdaq: EBIX)

63.8%

*****

NETGEAR (Nasdaq: NTGR)

28%

*****

ValueClick (Nasdaq: VCLK)

32.6%

****

Sources: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's; Motley Fool CAPS.

CAGR=compounded annual growth rate.

Generating copious amounts of cash doesn't make a company an automatic buy. But having looked at Enron's cash flows instead of its earnings would have saved many investors a lot of grief. Warren Buffett understands that the value of a company today is calculated by its discounted future cash flows, so use this list as a jumping-off point to dig deeper into the piles of cash.

Ka-ching!
Has the natural gas industry been too successful? Chesapeake Energy has been one of the heavyweights tapping deposits in the shale formations of Haynesville, Barnett, Marcellus, and Fayetteville. New techniques for getting to these previously inaccessible pockets, such as directional or horizontal drilling, have opened them up. And high prices enticed more companies to enter the market.

Yet Chesapeake, Devon Energy (NYSE: DVN), and others have done such a good job of bringing natural gas to the surface that we're now awash in it. And it's not just here at home where this is a problem, it's a worldwide phenomenon now, too, with the International Energy Agency warning that a global "acute glut" of natural gas could develop. Depressed prices look like they're here to stay, because even Chesapeake's CEO says "the days of double-digit gas prices in the U.S. are over."

There does seem to be something of a wild card here, though. ExxonMobil (NYSE: XOM) has demonstrated its belief that natural gas is going to become even bigger by buying XTO Energy. You don't commit $41 billion to a venture unless you're fairly certain it's going to be very profitable down the road.

Many investors agree we're not seeing the end of the natural gas industry as we know it, despite the doom and gloom we're hearing. CAPS member karlwmiller writes that if what the naysayers said were true, other energy-producing sectors would be affected, too.

If the U.S. were awash in natural gas, we would shut down the coal industry, stop building wind farms and solar farms, and there would be no need for a comprehensive energy plan for the U.S. to gain energy independence. We would simply flat-line natural gas prices.

This will not happen anytime in the near future. Natural gas is a fuel of the future, but price volatility will rise, not fall and this is not a bad thing. It is a sign of a healthy, vibrant, and credible asset class, "natural gas

Almost 7,000 CAPS members have offered their opinion on Chesapeake's future, and 97% of them feel it's going to outperform the market going forward. Head over now to the Chesapeake Energy CAPS page to see why this natural gas leader is expected to be a long-term winning investment.

Follow the money
While these stocks have left a trail of dollars, it pays to start your own research on Motley Fool CAPS. Read a company's financial reports, scrutinize key data and charts, and examine the comments your fellow investors have made -- all from a stock's CAPS page. Why not head over to the completely free CAPS service and let us hear what you have to say about these or any other stocks with good cash flow.

It's time to get short! Corporate earnings quality is at its lowest in decades. John Del Vecchio, CFA -- professional money manager and leading forensic accountant -- warns that even "safe" portfolios are at risk. Institutions pay thousands per month, but you can sample Del Vecchio’s research FREE. Just enter your email address below for instant access.

Ebix is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers pick, NETGEAR is a Stock Advisor selection, and Chesapeake Energy is an Inside Value pick. Dynamic Materials is a Motley Fool Hidden Gems recommendation. The Fool owns shares of Dynamic Materials, Chesapeake Energy, and XTO Energy. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Rich Duprey does not have a financial position in any of the stocks mentioned in this article. You can see his holdings. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 30, 2009, at 1:00 PM, karlwmiller wrote:

    Why the U.S. Natural Gas Industry is NOT in a State of Permanent Excess Supply

    December 30, 2009 - Karl W. Miller a senior energy executive and institutional investor today issued the following statement through his advisors, regarding the statements made today by a purported energy industry analyst on CNBC ( http://www.cnbc.com/id/34621936 ) that the U.S. Natural Gas Industry is in a state of "permanent excess". Mr. Miller believes that this statement was grossly irresponsible, not accurate, and has no merit whatsoever.

    Mr. Miller is a strong proponent of natural gas and called the revival of natural gas earlier this year ( http://www.investorideas.com/news/122909a.asp ), but the gross inaccuracies being portrayed about Natural gas production, supply, and end use in Washington and select media require immediate correction for the benefit of public interest.

    Natural gas is utilized by three major class of consumers; i) the power generation industry; ii) the industrial complex; iii) the local utilities across the U.S. which distribute natural gas to individual homes and office buildings.

    As Mr. Miller details in review of the "Dash to Natural Gas" of the 1990’s through 2005, a tremendous amount of natural gas fired power plants were constructed, some in "load centers" or major consumption areas, some in fringe areas like the southeast U.S. and some in outright poor locations.

    To put the rationale to construct all of these natural gas fired power plants in layman terms, these natural gas fired power plants were supposed to replace the older coal fired power plants controlled by the regulated utilities across the country, be more efficient, and emit much less CO2.

    The industry forecast and thesis at that time was for natural gas to be priced at $3.50/$4.00/mmbtu in perpetuity, as natural gas was in oversupply, plentiful and would never in theory be interrupted, thus always available for firm delivery.

    The plants were built on a scale never seen before in U.S. History, over $500 billion of debt was added to the top 80 utilities and natural gas companies going into 2001, and the independent natural gas power plant market promptly crashed, went into financial distress and faded away from the mainstream.

    The regulated utilities would not close the older, less efficient, and larger carbon emitting coal plants, nuclear stranded cost were winding down and the owners of nuclear power plants had substantially reduced amortized cost basis, thus could sell their power cheaper than natural gas plants, and the U.S. never implemented a national energy plan, and natural gas was not always available in certain regions during peak demand.

    These natural gas power plants are still on the ground, some running, some mothballed. If natural gas were truly "in permanent excess supply", the utilities would immediately shut down hundreds of the coal plants running 24 hours a day across the country, fire up the natural gas plants under their control, and contract with the independent power producers who control the other natural gas plants across the country. This has not happened during the past ten (10) years, nor will it happen anytime in the foreseeable future.

    To see Mr. Miller's entire article and analysis go to:

    http://www.investorideas.com/news/123009a.asp

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

TD AMERITRADE
more info
ShareBuilder
more info
Power E*Trade

more info
Scottrade
more info
Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1075035, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 9/5/2010 8:57:22 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 10,447.93 127.83 1.24%
S&P 500 1,104.51 14.41 1.32%
NASD 2,233.75 33.74 1.53%

Related Tickers

9/3/2010 4:00 PM
NTGR $23.03 Up +0.89 +4.02%
Netgear CAPS Rating: *****
VCLK $11.80 Up +0.15 +1.29%
ValueClick, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
EBIX $18.85 Up +0.09 +0.48%
Ebix CAPS Rating: *****
BOOM $14.83 Up +0.27 +1.85%
Dynamic Materials… CAPS Rating: *****
CHK $21.72 Up +0.34 +1.59%
Chesapeake Energy… CAPS Rating: *****
XOM $61.32 Up +0.26 +0.43%
ExxonMobil Corp CAPS Rating: ****
DVN $63.52 Up +0.58 +0.92%
Devon Energy Corp CAPS Rating: *****

Community: Investing Wiki

Term Of The Hour

Day trading: Day trading is the practice of quickly and frequently buying and selling stocks in the belief that the investor can capture substantial value through the short-term changes in the stock price.

Want to learn more or edit this definition?
Click here to read more!