Recs

9

The Government-Induced Drought

Whether you're talking about misleading, "apples-to-oranges" comparisons or the attractiveness of "low-hanging fruit," analogies that tie investing to agriculture permeate the market landscape. Of all these, I find none more thought-provoking as those of Ron Muhlenkamp, who actually grew up on a farm, went on to start his own no-load mutual fund, and now applies the patience and discipline he developed early in life to an investment philosophy that has helped him achieve an impressive long-term track record.

Muhlenkamp Fund

Expense Ratio

1.18%

Assets Under Management

$746.9 million

1-Year Return

35.9%

5-Year Annualized Return

(5.2%)

10-Year Annualized Return

4.3%

Source: Morningstar.

Top Holdings
As of Dec. 31, 2009

% of Net Assets

Philip Morris (NYSE: PM  )

4.65%

General Electric (NYSE: GE  )

3.97%

UnitedHealth (NYSE: UNH  )

3.96%

Pfizer (NYSE: PFE  )

3.81%

Kinetic Concepts (NYSE: KCI  )

3.66%

Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL  )

3.43%

AT&T (NYSE: T  )

3.29%

Source: Muhlenkamp Fund.

"We had a good year"
After correctly timing the market's lows in early 2009, Muhlenkamp put his cash to work last spring. As a result, he's already made good progress toward recovering the losses his shareholders incurred over the prior two years.

However, by no means does he think we're out of the woods. Among his chief concerns, Muhlenkamp thinks politicians will put pressure on the Fed to keep interest rates low even once the recovery starts up in full force. This same mistake, he believes, compounded the damage inflicted on our financial system by encouraging questionable lending practices that were prevalent through 2006 and 2007. Keeping rates too low for too long again, Muhlenkamp suggests, could lead to the same problems.

On top of that uncertainty, the profit-farmer sees speculative stimulus spending, pending health-care mandates, and other regulatory initiatives as serious impediments to future recovery.

Fate of the consumer
Perhaps the biggest issue that will influence the fate of consumers has to do with government incentives. In Japan, stimulus spending has gone primarily toward infrastructure maintenance and improvements. Muhlenkamp would rather see government money go toward funding incentives that give consumers and workers a direct benefit.

"I don't know too many people who work overtime so the government can build another bridge. I know a lot of people who are willing to work overtime so they can buy a Corvette or take a vacation, or have a nicer house, or whatever it is -- the discretionary kinds of things that we own. "

As Muhlenkamp sees it, proposed taxes and regulation in the U.S. threaten to take away the incentives that are currently in place. In his words, "If we kill the incentives, we'll kill any growth in the economy."

Stocks
Muhlenkamp believes that 2009's v-shaped stock market chart was a direct result of "forced selling that was caused by deleveraging among hedge funds and the resultant redemptions that took place in both hedge funds and mutual funds."

Subsequently, as he sees it, the party is over ... for now. Tying back to his concern about keeping rates too low for too long, Muhlenkamp sees a number of hedge funds participating in the carry trade, in which one borrows at low rates to buy other assets. In 2008, these funds were forced to sell after banks finally tightened their lending practices, and it could feasibly happen again.

What to do
All of these problems present challenges to investors trying to navigate the waters of the stock market. But as Muhlenkamp points out, "Our challenge as investors is to find companies which can thrive despite these penalties."

So what does the former farmhand look for in a stock? In short, he wants companies that have good profitability, the ability to deploy cash wisely, and the wherewithal to retain both of those qualities for the foreseeable future.

As of now, Muhlenkamp believes that stocks on average are fairly priced. "If inflation is 0% and long-term treasuries are about 3% ... then a company with an ROE of 7% or 8% should be worth book value. When we work through that process, a lot of companies are selling at what look like reasonable values." That may not answer lingering questions about the recovery, but it should tell you loud and clear that Muhlenkamp isn't planning to bail out of stocks entirely any time soon.

What do you see as the biggest obstacle to successful investing in coming years? Let me know in the comments below.

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Fool contributor Chris Jones has no position in any of the companies mentioned in this article. Pfizer and UnitedHealth Group are Motley Fool Inside Value picks. UnitedHealth Group is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation. Philip Morris International is a Motley Fool Global Gains selection. The Fool owns shares of Kinetic Concepts, Oracle, and UnitedHealth Group. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Motley Fool's disclosure policy grew up tall and grew up right with them Indiana boys on an Indiana night.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On February 08, 2010, at 1:34 PM, AnonymousLove wrote:

    Keep the Fed rate low. In fact, we should print more interest free constitutional money, i.e. "Treasury Notes" instead of the privately owned and interest bearing "Federal Reserve Notes". So, if you are into the whole depression and sufferage thing, and think that the U.S. is overpopulated, then by all means raise the Fed rate.

  • Report this Comment On February 08, 2010, at 1:37 PM, rodgerreno wrote:

    i think that the biggest problem is that the low /middle class workers are getting less benefits and pay than they have ever have in history in comparison to the cost of goods and services.the divide between the haves and the have nots is crystal clear.look what happened at gm,ford and other car manufactors,the hourly workers had to get less benefits,less pay, and probably--no retirement.management at the upperend was getting 3-400 times that workers pay.it wasn't just the ceo that was getting that rediculas pay and benefit package.it is clear to me that the reason that these companies were in a finantial mess was overpayment to management.the ugly truth is that a lot of management jobs have been replaced by computers,but the companies keep the management even though the value that they add is minumal.

  • Report this Comment On February 08, 2010, at 6:05 PM, jclaypool wrote:

    The first couple of posts do point out that there is an intrinsic lack of determining value and efficency in our economy. Both AnonymousLove's sarcastic shot at the current monetary system and rodgerreno's lament of the economic bottom earners versus the top show we have let our political and social leaders market society into believing half truths.

    Printing money does not create wealth. The dollar went from being a store of value to a manipulated tool. Tools in the hands of a true artisan create wonderous items; in lesser hands, they have a tendency to do more harm than good.

    Similarly, the notion that there should be some rational ratio of pay based on the top or bottom has a basis in social justice yet lacks one key ingredient, and that is the comparative advantage that workers bring to an enterprise. I have yet to encounter a company that did not need some type of janitorial staff. Similarly, few if any would not be succesful without effective management. Yet, I can find hundreds of millions of individuals that can be a passable janitor, far fewer that can be a passable manager. In both cases, the value of the position is dependent on the numbers of individuals qualified and willing to do the work, not a formula of where the bottom starts or the top is.

    As to the question, "What is the biggest obstacle to successful investing in coming years?", my take is our reliance on a strong central government. We are a diverse nation, and it is that diversity that is being squashed. Let the marketplace of ideas be tested in those incubators of self government, the states.

    Washington DC is insulated from the populace; it has no accountability. The ceding of tax dollars to the central government from the various state and local government entities strips communities of thier ability to make individual choices and respond to the concerns of the local constituency. It also breeds a dependency on the larger unit, making a convenient excuse that "It's out of our control" or "That's the way things get done", statements that just pass the buck.

    More government, especially one that is isolated from the populace, is not the answer. Not surprisingly, it is the source of more and more obstacles to a solution. There is a lot of truth to the idea that "The government is best that governs the least."

  • Report this Comment On February 09, 2010, at 4:41 PM, DWhiteYokle wrote:

    I agree with the first comment (AnonymousLove) in that this whole issue does, as he/she pointed out, boil down to the right to vote and clinical depression. Suffrage, as we all know, has been afforded to most people in the U.S., but with the over-population problem that "Anon" pointed out, there are too many votes to be counted (not only in Federal elections, but at the state and local levels too), therefore too much time is spent doing that instead of having real, open dialogue about the economy, and that makes people depressed. I feel that if we as a nation are going to rid ourselves of the clinical depression we are all in due to the voting habits of the masses, we should first take a look in the mirror and then, and only then, those among us that are without fiscal sin can cast the stones. I believe then we will be able to cope better and Obama will be happy because he and all of his advisers will be able to once again stimulate the economy with all the new mirrors they have to buy.

  • Report this Comment On March 08, 2010, at 7:37 AM, FriendyAnil001 wrote:

    I just wanted to say thank you for existing. This site is amazing and it makes me happy to know it's here. It makes me feel so much better that there are good jobs out there for people like me who care about making this earth a better place for our children. I can't say thank you enough to you guys for all the hard work that you do. It means a lot. THANK YOU.

    <a href="http://mls.fastrealestate.net" rel="dofollow">mls</a>

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1105991, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/9/2012 8:27:26 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated Moments ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,890.46 6.51 0.05%
S&P 500 1,351.95 1.99 0.15%
NASD 2,927.23 11.37 0.39%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/9/2012 4:02 PM
PM $80.06 Up +2.18 +2.80%
Philip Morris Inte… CAPS Rating: *****
T $29.99 Down -0.03 -0.10%
AT&T CAPS Rating: ***
UNH $53.06 Up +0.92 +1.76%
UnitedHealth Group CAPS Rating: *****
PFE $21.14 Up +0.13 +0.62%
Pfizer, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
GE $19.13 Down -0.11 -0.57%
General Electric C… CAPS Rating: ****
KCI.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Kinetic Concepts,… CAPS Rating: ****
ORCL $28.89 Up +0.16 +0.56%
Oracle Corp. CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement