Recs

5

Energy Storage Needs Better Utility Policy, Language, Culture

Utility-scale energy storage in the field today is limited to pumped hydro; a few large deployments using compressed air energy storage (CAES); hundreds of megawatts of sodium sulphur (NaS) batteries, mostly in Japan; and some experiments with banks of lithium-ion batteries, nickel-cadmium batteries, and regenerative fuel cells (flow batteries). Greentech Media has long covered the energy storage market with technologies that include:

Despite the tendency to nerd-out and get lost in the technology, the real challenge in energy storage is more in the policy and large-scale manufacturing realm. We'll get to that in a bit.

Five players across the energy storage ecosystem spoke today at an Agrion event in Palo Alto, California -- spanning the entrepreneurial, policy and investment fields:

Primus Power, Rick Winter, CTO
Primus Power is a flow battery company founded by Rick Winter, who also was involved with the founding of flow battery start-up Deeya Energy. In November 2009, Primus Power was selected by the U.S. DOE to receive a $14 million award as part of an overall $47 million project to commercialize a 25 megawatt-75 megawatt-hour energy storage system in Modesto, California as part of DOE's Smart Grid Demonstration Program. Primus' VC investors include Chrysalix.

Primus Power's flow battery technology is based on a zinc bromine system with zinc plating and de-plating. Winter notes that there are at least 10 different flow battery technologies in development.

EnerVault, Dr. Craig Horne, CEO
Enervault's flow battery technology is aimed at large-scale utility storage. The firm's founders have deep technical experience in energy storage and started their company "with a white sheet of paper," according to the CEO. They asked themselves, "What is the best way to store one megawatt-hour of power?" and they decided on the relative safety of flow batteries where there is a true separation of the power and energy component. The firm has closed an A round of $3.5 million from Oceanshore Ventures and U.S. Invest, and has won a $650,000 grant from the NY State Energy Research and Development Agency (NYSERDA). In Horne's view, the "big opportunity" lies in storage of greater than 100 kilowatts.

VantagePoint Venture Partners, Mr. Mark Platshon, Partner
VantagePoint's portfolio includes Tesla (Nasdaq: TSLA  ) , Better Place, Premium Power and Amprius -- firms directly involved in or with at least adjacencies in energy storage. Platshon stated a common theme at this event, "Energy Storage is not a monolithic single application." (See ESA chart below.) As an investment firm, they are "looking for people who are in the weeds of individual storage applications." He also expressed "big frustration with the FERC" and their reluctance for batteries to collect multiple revenue streams. He saw this tendency as a result of lobbying by gas turbine manufacturers.

Platshon likened asking utilities for their thoughts on storage akin to asking horses what they thought of cars at the dawn of the automotive age.

MegaWatt Storage Farms, Dr. Ed Cazalet, Co-Founder and Vice President
MegaWatt Storage Farms proposes to become an ISO, an independent storage operator -- technology agnostic with storage deployed on a massive scale. MegaWatt's analysis of the California grid indicates that about four gigawatts of storage (about 5% of peak demand) will be needed to support the 33% California RPS goal of 2020. Despite their technology agnosticism, MSW can only use proven technologies such as NaS, Li-ion, lead-acid batteries or flywheels from established firms like Beacon Power (Nasdaq: BCON  ) . Cazalet believes that unless there is true dynamic pricing -- energy storage is difficult if not impossible to realize on the utility scale.

Velkess, Bill Gray, CEO
Velkess is an early-stage energy storage firm using a kinetic flywheel to store energy in the momentum of a massive spinning wheel. The flywheel is basically a large mass spinning on a non-contact magnetic bearing. Because of high costs, they are used in frequency regulation or UPS applications, not actual utility-scale megawatt-hour energy storage.

While flywheels from companies like Active Power (Nasdaq: ACPW  ) , Beacon Power and Pentadyne Power are typically built from carbon fiber or high tensile steel, Gray claims a "fundamentally different approach to flywheels," which uses a different set of materials and engineering principles than traditional flywheels.

The audience included other VC investors (Greylock's Isaac Fehrenbach, Bessemer's Umesh Padval and Matan Friedman). Fehrenbach commented that with regards to flow batteries and some other storage technologies, that although we've seen the technology proven in "one-offs," we've yet to see these technologies "designed for manufacturing" or for high volume, high reliability and low cost. Bessemer just participated in the $29.5 million Round C investment in Xtreme Power, a large-scale advanced lead battery firm. 

Also in the audience were storage entrepreneurs like flow battery vendor Deeya Energy's Ajay Arora and LightSail Energy's Brooks Kincaid. LightSail is a Khosla Ventures-funded start-up working on compressed air storage. Danielle Fong, the CSO of LightSail, discusses energy storage and the perverse nature of utility incentives at her blog here.

Policy, language, and culture issues in the world of energy storage
Without the right pressure from the Public Utilities Commission (PUC) upon utilities, grid-scale utility storage will remain a good idea but never get implemented. Ed Cazalet of Megawatt Storage Farms speaks of the utility who will claim, "We can't sign this storage contract until we have a regulation telling us to do that."

Platshon of VantagePoint said that utilities see their customers as the PUC. Folks who actually write out checks paying utility bills every month are not considered customers -- they're rate payers. Someday utilities might actually realize just who their customer are.

Batteries aren't storage devices to utilities -- they're "negative loads."

And storage, because it doesn't have a true regulatory category, doesn't truly exist in the utility mind -- depending on who you ask, it could look like generation, or it might look like transmission or perhaps distribution. Rick Winter, Primus' CEO, spoke of factions within utilities who can't agree on where storage fits into their system.

AB 2514
AB 2514 is a bill currently in the California legislative process that has been, in part, suggested by Cazalet and recently championed by California gubernatorial candidate Jerry Brown. It has gone through some changes as it makes its way through the legislative sausage maker but nevertheless, remains a mandate for energy storage. If you are a Californian and believe that storage needs to be part of our renewable energy future, you might want to look into the bill and call your state senator.

Cazalet sees the potential passage of the bill as "Great news for electricity storage and renewables."

anImage

More from GreenTechMedia:

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

This article has been lightly edited. Try any of our Foolish newsletters today, free for 30 days. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 28, 2010, at 6:14 PM, IIcx wrote:

    Thanks Eric,

    I live in California and appreciate the effort that went into this article.

    The power grid is an antiquated mess focused around the idea that AC power generation can be efficiently transmitted over long distances. The problem is that they waste 40% of the fuel during carbon generation and have to maintain peak loads in the off chance someone will need it (wastes even more fuel).

    Storage at this scale (like Flywheel, which taxpayers funded via DOE grants since the last oil crisis -- late 1970s) only helps to eliminate the peak loads and doesn't address the real issues.

    Centralized power generation is the problem. If Jerry Brown actually wished to promote change (no evidence based on his track record), he would be promoting decentralized power generation to the benefit of CA taxpayers.

    The decentralized approach would also eliminate pollution which is a win-win for CA.

    The energy storage approaches listed work extremely well if they are downsized for residential usage. They also work well for light manufacturing in conjunction with Fuel Cells and new approaches.

    Here's a detailed look at Personalized (decentralized) Power currently promoted by our amazing Secretary of Energy Dr. Steven Chu (facebook.com/stevenchu):

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KTtmU2lD97o&feature=playe...

    I'm looking forward to your comments.

    Best,

    IIcx

  • Report this Comment On July 29, 2010, at 1:54 AM, provider3 wrote:

    Eric,

    your story may have many claims and a lot of facts with some decent information... however the truth is that beacon's flywheels are far from your so called traditional style flywheel... the make up of these flywheels took six years to develop and are cutting edge technology and are strongly supported by our amazing Secretary of Energy Steven Chu...I will get back to Beacon's flywheel...now if you click to Velkess you will find the following sentence: Velkess is currently working to develop larger prototypes that demonstrate its technology in actual large scale grid connected applications. Break it down and we get an undeveloped non-existent item....actual, meaning real existing as fact...so for fact this technology hasn't been demonstrated on a real/large scale grid connected application(s)....I wish Velkess the best with his endeavors.... Now the flywheels that Beacon makes are 'The Smart Energy 25 flywheel system' includes a rotating carbon-fiber composite rim, levitated on hybrid magnetic bearings operating in a near-frictionless vacuum-sealed environment. The rim itself is fabricated from a patented combination of high-strength, lightweight fiber composites, including graphite and fiberglass combined with resins, which allow the flywheel to rotate at high speeds (16,000 rpm) and store large amounts of energy as compared to flywheels made from metals. To reach its operational speed, the system draws electricity from the grid to power a permanent magnet motor. As the rim spins faster, it stores energy kinetically. The flywheel can spin for very extended periods with great efficiency because friction and drag are reduced by the use of magnetic bearings in a vacuum-sealed environment. Because it incurs low friction, little power is required to maintain the flywheel's operating speed. The 'Smart Energy 25 flywheel' is a 4th-generation advanced energy storage solution designed to meet the requirements of demanding utility grid applications. It features a long-life, low-maintenance design, highly cyclic (charge-discharge) capability, and zero fuel consumption or CO2 or other emissions. An array of Smart Energy flywheel units can be configured to form a Smart Energy Matrix plant, which can store and return megawatts of energy to maintain grid reliability and stability......IIcx, flywheels have been around for centuries however the advancement is modern time...take a look and you will discover a vast number of renewable energy companies with DOE loans, is that a bad thing?... a recent quote by our amazing Secretary of Energy "We know the clean energy challenge won't wait, and we won't wait either," Chu said...and if you want to find out more about Beacon click on this http://caps.fool.com/Blogs/beacon-power-the-grid-green

  • Report this Comment On July 29, 2010, at 9:42 AM, IIcx wrote:

    provider3,

    Flywheel is a cleaver idea but, as you point out, it stores energy during off-peak and uses the energy to level load during peak demand to help eliminate brown-outs and level power generation.

    The grid isn't going away anytime soon so its a solid fix for an existing grid problem but doesn't address the problem until its used to store power generated by another system.

    I also support what the DOE is doing with taxpayer funding and understand the Utility companies are not in the R&D game.

    Unfortunately, DOE funded projects frequently go unnoticed or are ignored.

    Consumers are far more likely to immediately implement new technology -- especially if the return on investment is logical. If the home generates its own power, the home appreciates in value and excess power can also be sold to the grid? Oh, and you pay or the system with what was a monthly power bill.

    Great solution for landlords and business as well.

    Storage is a big problem but, in my opinion, decentralizing power generation is the solution and California is likely to be an early adopter.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1250021, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/10/2012 5:16:09 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 6 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,890.46 6.51 0.05%
S&P 500 1,351.95 1.99 0.15%
NASD 2,927.23 11.37 0.39%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/9/2012 4:00 PM
TSLA $32.58 Up +0.65 +2.04%
Tesla Motors CAPS Rating: *
BCON $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Beacon Power Corp. CAPS Rating: ***
ACPW $0.99 Down -0.03 -2.83%
Active Power, Inc. CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement