Recs

8

Seaspan's Dividends May Not Last Forever

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Whether you're a beginning investor or a near-retiree, the importance of purchasing stocks that pay dividends cannot be overstated. Not only do companies that have quarterly or annual payouts provide you with a steady stream of income, they also have the potential for capital appreciation. Simply put, dividend stocks can you give your portfolio what almost no other investment can -- both income and growth.

At The Motley Fool, we're avid fans of dividends -- and not just because we like that steady stream of cash. Studies have shown that from 1972 to 2006, stocks in the S&P 500 that don't pay dividends have earned an average annual return of 4.1%; dividend stocks, however, have averaged a whopping 10.1% per year. That is an incredible difference -- one that you'd be crazy to not take advantage of!

But investing in dividends can be dangerous -- companies can cut, slash, or suspend dividends at any time, often without notice. Fortunately, there are several warning signs that may alert you, and these red flags could be the crucial factor in determining whether or not a company is likely to continue paying its dividend. Today, let's drill beneath the surface and check out Seaspan (NYSE: SSW  ) .

What's on the surface?
Seaspan, which operates in the marine industry, currently pays a dividend of 4.55%. That's certainly nothing to sneeze at, as the average dividend payer in the S&P 500, in 2009, sported a yield of 2%.

But what's more important than the dividend itself is Seaspan's ability to keep that cash rolling. The first thing to look at is the company's reported dividends versus its reported earnings. If you happen to see dividend payments that are growing faster than earnings per share, it may be an initial signal that something just isn't right. Check out the graph below for details of the past five years:

anImage

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's.

Wow -- something just isn't right here. Clearly, Seaspan has been keeping its dividend at a rate that is far above that of its reported earnings, and investors should proceed with caution. It's possible that there may be reason for this, so let's look further to see how much trouble we're actually in.

The more secure, the better
One of the most common metrics that investors use to judge the safety of a dividend is the payout ratio. This number tells you what percentage of net income is paid out to investors in the form of a dividend. Normally, anything above 50% is cause to look a bit further. According to the most recent data, Seaspan's payout ratio is not available because of negative earnings. This isn't necessarily a bad thing -- companies can increase their payout ratios over time, possibly because they are becoming more mature, or possibly because that's the best way to increase shareholder value. What's important is if there's enough cash on hand to support that high payout ratio, so let's look at free cash flow.

Free cash flow -- all the cash left over after subtracting out capital expenditures -- is used by firms to make acquisitions, develop new products, and of course, pay dividends! We can use a simple metric called the cash flow coverage ratio, which is cash flow per share divided by dividends per share. Normally, anything above 1.2 should make you feel comfortable; anything less, and you may have a problem on your hands. Seaspan's coverage ratio is -22.54, which isn't enough to make me feel comfortable as an investor. There could be a number of reasons the number is so low -- maybe it's typical for the industry, maybe there's a significant amount of debt coming due, or maybe Seaspan is simply less than stellar at managing its assets. However, it's worth noting that Seaspan has been on a buying binge which has decreased this number. In a recent write-up, advisor Andy Cross noted that the company generates $10 in operating profits for every $1 in interest expense.

Either way, it's always beneficial to compare an investment with its most immediate competitors and other companies across shipping, so in the chart below, I've included the above metrics with those of Seaspan's closest competitors. Check out how Seaspan stacks up below:

Company

Dividend

Yield

Payout

Ratio

Coverage Ratio

Seaspan

4.55%

N/M

-22.54

Navios Maritime Partners (NYSE: NMM  )

9.59%

115.17%

-1.78

Safe Bulkers (NYSE: SB  )

7.87%

19.77%

2.02

Overseas Shipholding Group (NYSE: OSG  )

5.43%

N/M

-10.38

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. N/M = not meaningful.

The Foolish bottom line
Only you can decide what numbers you're comfortable with in the end; sometimes a higher yield and a higher reward means additional risk. However, in this situation, Seaspan's payout ratio seems to be above the peer average, which means if you're a prudent investor, you may want to look elsewhere for the most secure payment possible. The only company here that actually has a respectable ratio is Safe Bulkers, so proceed with caution for the rest. The bottom line, however, is to make sure that with anything -- whether it be a dividend, a share repurchase, or an ordinary earnings report -- you do your own due diligence. Looking at all of the numbers in the best context possible is just the best place to start.

Best Odds in the Universe!
If you're interested in a 98.79% chance at beating the market... and a 70.84% chance at DOUBLING the market's return – Motley Fool Supernova could be just what you're looking for. And get this: We arrived at these odds from 10,000 random back-tested portfolios composed of Motley Fool Co-founder David Gardner's personal stock picks.

It's why David recently handpicked a small team of world-class portfolio managers. You see, he thinks these odds can get even better! And he'd like to prove it to you...

Simply enter your email address. And the answer to the question everybody is asking will be delivered to your inbox!

Jordan DiPietro owns no shares. The Fool owns shares of Seaspan. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. True to its name, The Motley Fool is made up of a motley assortment of writers and analysts, each with a unique perspective; sometimes we agree, sometimes we disagree, but we all believe in the power of learning from each other through our Foolish community. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 03, 2010, at 6:06 PM, EdgeTrader2001 wrote:

    A cursory read through the 10-K would have revealed that depreciation, which is subtracted to arrive at EPS, is not reflective of the actual cash flows of the business. Try either EBITDA or Cash Flow from Operations less maintenance CAPEX (not new ship purchases), and re-run your coverage ratios. While depreciation certainly matters, ships are long lived assets (30 years). Timing of cash flows matter and ships do not need to be replaced for 20-30 years. Even if SSW had to dispose of their fleet at the end of 20 years, their actual cash flows would represent a higher NPV than if you simply took their earnings at face value and discounted them.

  • Report this Comment On September 03, 2010, at 7:41 PM, gonchix wrote:

    Dear Jordan

    I disagree with you,

    you are comparing:

    Navios Maritime Partners - Bulk Carrier

    Safe Bulkers - Bulk Carrier

    Overseas Shipholding Group - Oil Carrier

    Vs

    Seaspan - A containerships charterer

    maybe you could compare it with:

    Global Ship Lease Inc (NYSE: GSL)

    but not against bulk carriers, working on spot charter rates with daily changes.

    They all operate ships, but are totally different businesses.

    Seaspan business model is very predictable, and may be a good option to diversify a portfolio so far you understand the insight of the business.

  • Report this Comment On September 03, 2010, at 8:03 PM, chrisforgot wrote:

    Hi Jordon,

    As EdgeTrader and gonchix have pointed out, some basic research into the company would have revealed why Seaspan's numbers are what they are and why the dividend is reliable.

    But I guess if you're busy publishing 39 articles over the past 3 days (covering a dozen or so industries!) you probably don't have much time for detailed research and analysis.

  • Report this Comment On September 08, 2010, at 11:26 AM, beckalodeon99 wrote:

    Yes, and some basic Google-ing would have brought up Value Investigator, the web site for deep-value investor Irwin Michael:

    http://www.valueinvestigator.com/en/valuefavourites/ssw.php

    That guy tears apart the financials.

    Once everyone starts to understand the SSW business model, most of the easy gains (and dividends) will have been made.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1291047, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 2/11/2012 12:46:26 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 2 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,801.23 -89.23 -0.69%
S&P 500 1,342.64 -9.31 -0.69%
NASD 2,903.88 -23.35 -0.80%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

2/10/2012 4:03 PM
SB $7.23 Down -0.18 -2.44%
Safe Bulkers CAPS Rating: ****
SSW $15.32 Down -0.62 -3.89%
Seaspan Corp CAPS Rating: *****
NMM $15.91 Down -0.20 -1.24%
Navios Maritime Pa… CAPS Rating: ****
OSG $10.18 Down -1.65 -13.95%
Overseas Shipholdi… CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement