Numbers can lie -- but they're the best first step in determining whether a stock is a buy. In this series, we use some carefully chosen metrics to size up a stock's true value based on the following clues:
- The current price multiples
- The consistency of past earnings and cash flow
- How much growth we can expect
Let's see what those numbers can tell us about how cheap Phillips-Van Heusen
The current price multiples
First, we'll look at most investors' favorite metric: the P/E ratio. It divides the company's share price by its earnings per share (EPS) -- the lower, the better.
Then, we'll take things up a notch with a more advanced metric: enterprise value to unlevered free cash flow. This divides the company's enterprise value (basically, its market cap plus its debt, minus its cash) by its unlevered free cash flow (its free cash flow, adding back the interest payments on its debt). Like the P/E, the lower this number is, the better.
Analysts argue about which is more important -- earnings or cash flow. Who cares? A good buy ideally has low multiples on both.
Phillips-Van Heusen has a P/E ratio of 144.1 and an EV/FCF ratio of 26.8 over the trailing 12 months. If we stretch and compare current valuations to the five-year averages for earnings and free cash flow, Phillips-Van Heusen has a P/E ratio of 35.7 and a 5-year EV/FCF ratio of 32.3.
A one-year ratio under 10 for both metrics is ideal. For a 5-year metric, under 20 is ideal.
Phillips-Van Heusen is 0 for 4 on hitting the ideal targets, but let's see how it compares against some competitors and industry mates.
Company |
1-Year P/E |
1-Year EV/FCF |
5-Year P/E |
5-Year EV/FCF |
---|---|---|---|---|
Phillips-Van Heusen |
144.1 |
26.8 |
35.7 |
32.3 |
Polo Ralph Lauren |
17.2 |
14.4 |
21.6 |
15.2 |
V.F. |
15.9 |
8.9 |
16.4 |
14.0 |
Perry Ellis International |
15.2 |
6.7 |
21.7 |
7.3 |
Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's; NM = not meaningful.
Numerically, we've seen how Phillips-Van Heusen's valuation rates on both an absolute and relative basis. Next, let's examine...
The consistency of past earnings and cash flow
An ideal company will be consistently strong in its earnings and cash flow generation.
In the past five years, Phillips-Van Heusen's net income margin has ranged from 0.9% to 7.5%. In that same time frame, unlevered free cash flow margin has ranged from 6.3% to 10.9%.
How do those figures compare with those of the company's peers? See for yourself:
Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's; margin ranges are combined.
Additionally, over the last five years, Phillips-Van Heusen has tallied up five years of positive earnings and five years of positive free cash flow.
Next, let's figure out...
How much growth we can expect
Analysts tend to comically overstate their five-year growth estimates. If you accept them at face value, you will overpay for stocks. But while you should definitely take the analysts' prognostications with a grain of salt, they can still provide a useful starting point when compared to similar numbers from a company's closest rivals.
Let's start by seeing what this company's done over the past five years. In that time period, Phillips-Van Heusen has put up past EPS growth rates of -19.1%. Meanwhile, Wall Street's analysts expect future growth rates of 15%.
Here's how Phillips-Van Heusen compares to its peers for trailing five-year growth:
Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's; EPS growth shown.
And here's how it measures up with regard to the growth analysts expect over the next five years:
Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's; estimates for EPS growth.
The bottom line
The pile of numbers we've plowed through has shown us how cheap shares of Phillips-Van Heusen are trading, how consistent its performance has been, and what kind of growth profile it has -- both on an absolute and a relative basis.
The more consistent a company's performance has been and the more growth we can expect, the more we should be willing to pay. We've gone well beyond looking at a 144.1 P/E ratio.
Even disregarding that silly P/E ratio caused by its really low trailing earnings, Phillips-Van Heusen is the least numerically impressive of the four companies we've looked at.
If you find any of these numbers compelling (like Perry Ellis's low cash flow multiples), don't stop. Continue your due diligence process until you're confident that the initial numbers aren't lying to you.