Recs

19

The Crucial Asset Your Investments Ignore

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Companies with diverse workforces can compete more effectively. Yet corporate boardrooms and executive offices still lack one source of diverse viewpoints: women.

When it comes to the stocks in your portfolio, female points of view may be an undervalued, if not outrageously underutilized, advantage.

The invisible woman
Catalyst, a nonprofit organization that stands up for increased opportunities for women, recently released a report revealing that women experienced little forward progress in the realms of compensation and placement in corporate boardrooms in 2010.

Among its disappointing findings: Men with mentors enjoyed more promotions and higher rates of pay than women, while women with mentors were far less likely to experience the same benefits from mentorship as their male peers.

Of the Fortune 500 companies Catalyst examined, 136 had no female executives whatsoever. These included ExxonMobil, Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK-B  ) , Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) , and Sears Holdings.

Companies with the best showing of female executives included Gap (NYSE: GPS  ) , Limited Brands (NYSE: LTD  ) , and Western Union (NYSE: WU  ) .

Designing women
The past year did see some growth in this realm, but it was pretty unimpressive. Women commanded 14.4% of executive positions, a modest increase over 13.5% last year. When it comes to the best-paid executives, 7.6% were women, up from 6.3% last year.

Changes in female presence on corporate boards were dismal. Women had 15.7% of board seats this past year, just half a percentage point higher than last year's tally.

Personally, I'm no fan of quotas. Regardless of anything else, merit should always be the main concern in promoting and hiring. But many corporations may fail to adequately, rationally assess true merit, and in consequence ignore the myriad benefits female employees can add to a company's competitive advantage.

Forbes recently pointed to a Harvard Business Review article on the importance of retaining female workers in an era when many women decide to exit the workforce. While women's work methods aren't easily quantifiable (nor is the cost of losing women workers easily measurable in the monetary sense), many female traits are essential in an innovative, robust corporate workplace. Companies should strive to keep women on their payrolls, and be open to promoting them to the top ranks.

According to the Harvard Business Review, the advantages women generally bring to the workplace include:

  • Resourcefulness -- doing more with less.
  • Collaboration, including listening skills and group-oriented problem solving.
  • The ability to multitask, and to absorb and integrate different viewpoints quickly and effectively.

Needless to say, companies that don't pay attention to these strengths may lose faster routes to a better business, even as they increase their overall risks.

A new year to think differently
There's plenty of evidence that female perspectives can be a secret weapon in business. Many corporate managements (and shareholders) probably don't quite understand this, so they severely undervalue it -- to their own detriment.

In finance, cognitive diversity in groups helps avoid potential bubbles and other would-be disasters. Groups of people whose backgrounds, temperaments, and experience encourage them to think and analyze in different ways can often make decisions more aptly and accurately. When everyone thinks the same way, things can go very wrong in investing and business.

Unfortunately, Catalyst's 2010 report on women's lagging role in the workplace isn't too comforting in that respect. Let's hope that in 2011, more corporate managers and shareholders will rethink the way they value women in the workplace, and better appreciate their ability to drive a more robust, innovative workforce.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Berkshire Hathaway and Western Union are Motley Fool Inside Value selections and Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations. Motley Fool Options has recommended writing a covered strangle position on Western Union. The Fool owns shares of Berkshire Hathaway, ExxonMobil, and Limited Brands. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Alyce Lomax does not own shares of any of the companies mentioned. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On December 18, 2010, at 2:24 PM, Corporality wrote:

    Here here! I am a man and so know what a man is likely to think, but when I want a different perspective I often talk about it with a woman. Women, who know you want to hear their honest opinion instead of just having your preconceptions reinforced, are in my view, invaluable. I find, unless they've had it devalued out of them, they have a more intuitive and holistic view of a company's standing. I find my more linear thinking challenged and forced to assimilate the points they bring up and feel like I've got a more sure grip afterwards.

    If women are the result of genetic selection and adaptation to make an individual with family raising skills and men's role has been untill recently, to go out, kill animals and haul them back to camp, honestly, which individual is better skilled at raising a healthy company?

  • Report this Comment On December 18, 2010, at 5:23 PM, BrewDood wrote:

    I hate to disagree, but THE crucial asset is time. Be it exercising patience or just getting started with something, time is the only asset no company nor any individual can recapture.

    How much time is wasted when an employee surfs the net instead of doing what he's paid for? How much time is wasted jiggering the books instead of powering through a company's mission?

    What could you have done this year with all the time you spent on your sofa watching sports?

    Efficient use of time takes planning, talent and, well, time. Collectively, where would our society be right now if everyone used their time wisely? Might the recession be over already? Is it possible that there wouldn't have even been a recession?

    The only thing that proves elusive is timing the market.

    I hate to argue with the Rolling Stones, but time is not on our side. It tick, tick, ticks whether we're thinking about it or not.

    Maybe we should start thinking more about time wasted and the rest will fall into place.

  • Report this Comment On December 19, 2010, at 1:14 PM, paglidd wrote:

    Thank you Corporality, for not trying to deflect the main point of this timely article away from its main point. Catalyst findings have consistently and massively been supported by other researchers.

    BTW, when I look at the faces running the different Fools premium services (services I use and love).... they are all male.

  • Report this Comment On December 20, 2010, at 6:20 AM, refriedbean wrote:

    The poor devils are slaves to their hormones and if you've ever been married to a menapausal women you would, for sure, know what I mean. Geez! Do they get crazy or what? Women are definitely more likely to get semi-postal and stressed during these transitional phases in their lives and how that might relate to the board room, I don't know, but I fear it can't be good. I'm glad my real name doesn't appear with this comment or I'd be in deep doo doo.

  • Report this Comment On December 28, 2010, at 7:58 PM, TC118 wrote:

    Women are an underutilized asset in the board rooms of Corporate America, because they are an underutilized asset in middle management (which serves as the talent pool from which senior management is drawn). However, over time, market efficiencies will work in the favor of women as the talent pool of workers feeding middle management changes. Already, more women than men are getting undergraduate degrees in this country. Eventually, that will spill over to post-graduate degrees and the work place. I hold an MBA in Finance and I have many more opportunities in Corporate America than the preceding generation did, but I still have felt the effects of the glass ceiling pretty strongly. Time is on the side of women. As more women own, grow, and inherit businesses, ever more opportunities will open up. It is like compound interest. The change can't happen in a day, but it happens at a steady pace and the results grow more rapidly over time.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1404131, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 4:12:47 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 6 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:01 PM
LTD $46.41 Up +0.47 +1.02%
Limited Brands Inc… CAPS Rating: ***
WU $16.90 Down -0.13 -0.76%
Western Union CAPS Rating: *****
GPS $27.16 Up +0.17 +0.63%
Gap CAPS Rating: **
BRK-B $79.25 Down -0.55 -0.69%
Berkshire Hathaway CAPS Rating: *****
C $26.47 Down -0.19 -0.71%
Citigroup Inc CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement