Recs

4

Amazon.com May Be Cheaper Than You Think

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Here's why Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) may be cheaper than you think.

In the daily noise machine of CNBC, analyst estimates, and quarterly announcements, investors are inundated with talking heads obsessing over earnings-per-share figures.

Earnings, or net income, is an accounting construction that is the basis for the price-to-earnings ratio, the most popular way of measuring how cheap or expensive a stock is.

But free cash flow -- the amount of cash a company earns on its operations minus what it spends on them -- is another, oftentimes more accurate measure of earnings that can give you an advantage.

How Amazon.com stacks up
If Amazon.com tends to generate more free cash flow than net income, there's a good chance earnings-per-share figures understate its profitability and overstate its price tag. Conversely, if Amazon.com consistently generates less free cash flow than net income, it may be less profitable and more expensive than it appears.

This graph compares Amazon.com's historical net income to free cash flow. (I omitted various gains and charges such as tax deferrals, restructurings, and benefits related to stock options.)


Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's, and author's calculations.

As you can see, Amazon.com has a tendency to produce more free cash flow than net income. This means that the standard price-to-earnings multiple investors use to judge companies may overstate its price tag.

There can be a variety of reasons to disregard such a discrepancy; for example, free cash flow can overstate earnings in businesses with volatile working capital needs, or understate earnings in high growth companies that are reinvesting capital in the business.

Alternatively, in cases where free cash flow more accurately measures earnings, such a discrepancy can indicate a company that is more -- or less -- expensive than investors realize.

Let's examine Amazon.com alongside some of its peers for additional context:

Company

Price-to-Earnings Ratio

Adjusted Price-to-Free-Cash-Flow Ratio

Amazon.com 67.8 59.2
Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) 23.2 36.8
eBay (Nasdaq: EBAY  ) 24.2 37.1
Overstock.com (Nasdaq: OSTK  ) 30.0 66.4

On a P/E basis, Amazon.com looks pricier than its peers.

Amazon.com's free cash flow multiple is less expensive than its earnings multiple, suggesting that Amazon.com's stock might be somewhat cheaper than many investors realize.

Interested in any of these stocks? You can keep track of them by adding them to My Watchlist:

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Ilan Moscovitz owns shares of Google. Google is a Motley Fool Inside Value pick. Google is a Motley Fool Rule Breakers recommendation. Amazon.com and eBay are Motley Fool Stock Advisor selections. The Fool owns shares of Google. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 03, 2011, at 10:25 AM, younessi wrote:

    Only a fool would think Amazon is cheap. Well, this is motley FOOL anyway.

  • Report this Comment On March 03, 2011, at 10:29 AM, stockpikrguy wrote:

    The premise of your article is valid, but this assumes quality cashflow generation. If you look at the cashflow generation in the most recent year or qtr, nearly 2/3 of the cashflow has been from increasing accounts payable. AMZN increased cashflow by $2.3B in the recent quarter by dragging out AP.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1451888, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 6:12:55 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 8 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
GOOG $591.53 Down -12.13 -2.01%
Google CAPS Rating: ****
OSTK $6.70 Down -0.03 -0.45%
Overstock.com CAPS Rating: *
AMZN $212.89 Down -2.35 -1.09%
Amazon.com CAPS Rating: ***
EBAY $40.35 Up +0.68 +1.71%
eBay CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement