Recs

12

An Imminent Catalyst for the Hybrid Revolution

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Given recent developments in the Arab world, I wish I could store several barrels of oil in my backyard and be insured against any future political turmoil in various regions of the world. But I simply do not have that much money.

Spiraling oil prices give me the jitters because the cost of the stuff affects me in so many ways. This makes me wonder why a better solution, one that lies in hybrid cars, has still not made more of a meaningful impact on the U.S. transportation market.

Now that the days of high-priced oil are back on the brain, I wonder how many more people are again considering this legitimate and increasingly cost-effective solution.

Reshaping the demand curve
If we are increasingly able to do away with oil, I and others like me become less sensitive to the wild price swings we've experienced in the past five years. The question remains, however: Is the supply side ready with the appropriate product? Are hybrids matching up to the performance of purely petroleum-based cars? Can they provide the same passenger comfort? Unfortunately, these are the questions that matter when it comes to solving a problem of far greater significance.

Are the automobile companies ready to pre-empt the market?
Let's see how the industry stacks up by maker:

Toward the beginning of the last decade, Toyota (NYSE: TM  ) was first off the blocks with a new breed of cars -- hybrid electric cars. Today, the company says it expects to realize its goal of 1 million annual global hybrid sales by the end of this year. The Japanese automaker currently sells more than 10 hybrids, including dedicated models such as the Prius and Lexus HS 250h. And the Prius still dominates the hybrid market.

Honda's (NYSE: HMC  ) Insight, however, has yet to see much success. As of October 2010, the company had sold 1,965 units of the hybrid -- a distant second to Prius which sold 11,731 units during the month.

Among the American auto manufacturers, Ford (NYSE: F  ) has developed some hybrid cars such as the Ford Fusion and Ford Escape SUV, which are not doing too badly in the market. In fact, the Ford Fusion hybrid is the third largest selling hybrid in the U.S.

But the future is unlikely to be kind to the hybrid. Fully electric cars are a nascent market that is just now being tapped. With a lot of political pressure coming down on automakers to provide an assortment of legitimate all-electric vehicles, the reality may be coming down the pike sooner than anyone thinks.

President Barack Obama has called for a million electric vehicles on American roads by 2015. The Chevy Volt (product of parent company General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) ) and the Nissan Leaf are pretty much the only names to watch here for now, but surely when discussing numbers of this scale, newer, bolder entrants are sure to follow.

It will be interesting to see how consumers take to the concept of 100% electric cars. These cars are usually expensive to own and, therefore, it's not absurd to expect some kind of significant tax incentive credit from the government to purchase one, especially if the goal of 1 million electric cars by 2015 is to be achieved.

How popular are these hybrid cars?
The latest sales figures are not so great. Hybrid car sales fell for the third consecutive year, dropping nearly 6% in a year when overall vehicle sales jumped by 11 %. Low gas prices and questions about the reliability of hybrid technology affected the sales of hybrids in 2010. But perhaps more significant was the fact that sales dropped so hard during the heat of this recession, which may be testament to the fact that consumers still feel as if hybrid technology is more of a luxury good than a realistic answer to ever-rising energy prices.

People still believe that all-gas cars are superior for a variety of reasons. It's just that unpredictable oil prices force consumers to give the hybrids some serious consideration. In December 2010, when oil prices rose by 30 %, hybrid sales jumped by 36% compared to November 2010.

It's clear that the onus is on the car manufacturers to make hybrids that deliver similar performance to their gas-powered counterparts. Backed by a decade of research, Toyota, of course, is best placed to overcome performance issues. Car manufacturers like General Motors, Daimler, and Volkswagen AG have some catching up to do.

Now what?
Consumers value performance and rightly so. Stereotypically speaking, hybrid cars demand that an owner sacrifice high performance for efficiency. But that's likely to change over time as the technology becomes more sophisticated. Plus, the majority of the U.S. population is moving to urban areas, which are getting congested. Gradually, performance will simply have to take a back seat to fuel efficiency and even space efficiency. This is yet another reason to believe that these cars are the future of the American road.

Hybrid car sales stand at just 2.37% of total sales in the United States. But I sense an explosive growth in demand is sitting in the cards.

Have we managed to beat the oil at least as far as restricting our fuel bills goes?
For the time being, it's prudent to watch how the demand and supply situation in this industry niche pans out, especially in light of political conflict in the Middle East and Africa. As costs of fuel increase and the supply of hybrid and electric technology increases in sophistication and decreases in price, I feel as if we're standing at the very precipice of an absolute revolution in the makeup of the American highway.

So here's a toast not to the car manufacturers but to "us," the people. We may not necessarily be able to predict oil price movement (I wonder who can do that accurately), but at least we will have a choice to dodge some crude shocks.

Keep up with the stocks mentioned in this article by tracking them in our free watchlist service, My Watchlist.

Jeff Fischer and team have demystified options. And they can rack up income like $1,030... $2,626... and $3,228 on a schedule you can set your watch by!
That's why we're glad to announce every single one of their closely guarded strategies is available to YOU during May and June – 100% FREE, no strings attached! Just enter your email address in the box below...

Sarosh Nicholas owns shares of no companies listed above. General Motors is a Motley Fool Inside Value choice. Ford Motor is a Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendation. The Fool owns shares of Ford Motor. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (5) | Recommend This Article (12)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On March 08, 2011, at 10:19 AM, catoismymotor wrote:

    Another way to play the increase in hybrids is LIT. I don't own it, but it will be the next new holding I add to my retirement account.

  • Report this Comment On March 08, 2011, at 12:08 PM, speedieone wrote:

    Your mention of population movement to the urban environment begs the question as to why we do not focus on rail transport and eliminate the car. Europe dealt with this issue decades ago and has one of the best rail systems in the world (along with Japan). The high speed rail initiative in California (and the recently abandoned one in Florida) is a great example of another alternative to decrease our need for oil. If we invested in rail infrastructure and brought back the industry that used to build trains in this country, we could create a new economy.

  • Report this Comment On March 08, 2011, at 8:32 PM, DDHv wrote:

    Per hybrids, most manufacturers are looking at the stop-start. The primary need is for batteries that can handle more cycles: look at AXPW, & MXWL.

    Per passenger rail, search on "personal rapid transit." We have the technology if we will only use it. PRT systems cost about a tenth as much as light rail, and can handle more passengers, more conveniently.

  • Report this Comment On March 09, 2011, at 11:41 AM, MrChapel wrote:

    @speedieone,

    You make the mistake of putting every single country in Europe under the heading of Europe, comparing them to Japan. If I may ask, which European country have you been to and which domestic train company did you ride one?

    I live in the Netherlands. For the last several years, as soon as fall approaches, we disparage the NS (Nederlandse Spoorwegen aka Dutch Railways) because they'll be coming out with a multitude of reasons why trains are still not riding on time. Every year, they claim the leaves falling off trees give them trouble.

    In December 2010, the third (or is it fourth) year in a row, snow thickness of less than an inch, has caused widespread cancellation of rail traffic for almost a week. In fact, the new light trains bought for millions from Siemens and Bombardier were pulled even earlier because the electronics aren't capable of working in temperatures of minus 3 or 5 Celsius.

    High Speed Rail? Billions have been invested in NS HiSpeed. Last month, news leaked that next year, unless they manage to fill the trains, the company will go bankrupt. Biggest problem? Getting the seats filled, since it's faster and cheaper to fly to destinations like Paris or closer cities. The only way to do that is to subsidize the trains which means another attack on taxpayers' wallets. That is, next to the taxpayers already having funded the infrastructure for the project with their taxes.

    The only ones making money, are the infrastructure builders and the train builders, which are the same ones that will benefit with the high-speed rail lines in California.

    Now, if you had chosen Switzerland or Germany instead of the all-encompassing Europe, I might have agreed with you. However, speedie, remember this, rail transport of people is only economically viable across long distances, if it is faster then other modes of transportation and if those are more expensive.

  • Report this Comment On March 12, 2011, at 10:55 AM, REALISER wrote:

    The power plants of carbon fuel automobiles

    have long lives. These vehicles are useful for

    second hand use, filling the demand for low

    priced, personal transportation. Plug in vehicles

    have a limited cycle of battery charges, until the

    batteries must be replaced. This fact is seldom

    discussed by those advocating all electric cars.

    Who is going to buy a used vehicle that is likely to

    require $10,000.00 or more worth of new batteries?

    Perhaps we taxpayers will be asked to subsidize

    the used plug in vehicles as well!

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1454343, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/23/2013 8:17:16 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 11 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 15,307.17 -80.41 -0.52%
S&P 500 1,655.35 -13.81 -0.83%
NASD 3,463.30 -38.82 -1.11%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/22/2013 4:06 PM
HMC $41.27 Down -0.61 -1.46%
Honda Motor Co., L… CAPS Rating: *****
TM $127.84 Down -1.88 -1.45%
Toyota Motor Corp… CAPS Rating: ***
F $14.97 Up +0.02 +0.13%
Ford CAPS Rating: ****
GM $33.23 Down -0.17 -0.51%
General Motors CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement