Recs

6

This Week's 5 Dumbest Stock Moves

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

Stupidity is contagious. It gets us all from time to time. Even respectable companies can catch it. As I do every week, let's take a look at five dumb financial events this week that may make your head spin.

1. Scrapping the PlayBook
Tuesday's rollout of Research In Motion's (Nasdaq: RIMM  ) PlayBook wasn't the winner that battered RIM investors were expecting.

Instead of a stand-alone tablet that would make up for lost time by slaying the existing competition, RIM gave us an overpriced BlackBerry accessory. Third-party reports have BlackBerry moving 30,000 to 50,000 units on the first day, a far cry from being a legitimate threat to the iconic iPad 2.

My friend Anders Bylund calls the PlayBook a mullet, but I think it's more of a crew cut. At least a mullet combined business in the front with party in the back. Unless RIM acts quickly to beef up reviewer shortcomings, there won't be a party here.

2. Check it out
Don't be surprised if you see more Kindle-toting book lovers at your local library.

In a move that some would argue is long overdue but bears a financial price, Amazon.com (Nasdaq: AMZN  ) will finally allow its device to be used for digital rentals that can be checked out at the local library.

Kindle's rivals already do that, but Amazon was holding out. Price wars have driven e-reader prices down to ridiculous levels, and the real margins rest in e-book purchases. The last thing Amazon wants is for someone to buy a possibly subsidized Kindle without having to purchase any books. Analysts are already expecting margins to get crushed when Amazon reports its first quarter results next week. This is a pro-consumer move that should be commended on principle, but margins may very well contract even more.

Millions of Kindles have already been sold, so it's not as if Amazon needed this move to succeed. Did Amazon really need to open up the floodgates of free books to go mainstream?

3. I've seen how this story ends
Shares of Chinese online gaming pioneer Shanda Interactive (Nasdaq: SNDA  ) popped 17% higher on Monday after revealing plans to spin off its online literature subsidiary.

I'm all for spinoffs when a stock is undervalued because its sum is not greater than its parts, but this isn't Shanda's predicament.

Here are just a few of the reasons why the investor enthusiasm doesn't make sense:

  • Shanda Interactive is already trading at a healthy earnings multiple relative to its peers.
  • Online literature in China remains a fledgling niche that is difficult to monetize.
  • Shanda's only other spinoff is trading more than 40% below its 2009 IPO price.
  • Shanda itself has been a financial disappointment, sorely missing Wall Street's profit targets in each and every quarter last year.

4. Buy now or later
In a move that seems evolutionary at first glance, Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX  ) has a "Buy now" link on its website under the Little Fockers movie listing.

The movie is available as a rental or purchase through nearly every retailer, DVD shop, and piecemeal downloading site in the country outside of Netflix and Coinstar's (Nasdaq: CSTR  ) Redbox as a result of the 28-day release delay window that the two bargain renters agreed to. Is Netflix finally waking up to the opportunity of offering third-party sources for flicks it doesn't carry?

Not exactly. The ad simply links to the official Little Fockers website, whose landing page mocks Redbox and Netflix for its lack of availability.

Netflix loses points for agreeing to link to a belittling site, but the real crime here is that Netflix is leaving money on the table by not giving subscribers a one-stop shop for all celluloid.  

5. At the pump
BP
(NYSE: BP  ) is suing Transocean (NYSE: RIG  ) for tens of billions of dollars in damages related to last year's catastrophic rig explosion and oil spill.

It's easy to see why BP doesn't want to be the fall guy. It has already recorded more than $40 billion in liabilities stemming from the accident, and the hits keep on coming. We're talking about a lot of money.

However, this isn't going to go well with Joe and Jane Unleaded. BP is ripping at an old wound that seemed to be healing. The "boycott BP" movement has been forgotten by most. Why would BP want to drum up renewed public accusations of greed in a case that may further muddy up its image and that it probably won't win?

Which of these five moves do you think is the dumbest? Share your thoughts in the comment box below.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Amazon.com and Netflix are Motley Fool Stock Advisor picks. Alpha Newsletter Account, LLC has bought puts on Netflix. The Fool owns shares of Transocean. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

Longtime Fool contributor Rick Munarriz is a fan of dumb and smart business moves. Investors can learn plenty from both. He does not own shares in any of the stocks in this story, except for Netflix. Rick is also part of the Rule Breakers newsletter research team, seeking out tomorrow's ultimate growth stocks a day early. The Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2011, at 1:25 PM, RobDLondon wrote:

    WRT to (1)The "S" word

    Segmentation...this market is so big, I think that one needs to look at the segments.

    there's quite an apt cartoon on the smart phone segmentation

    http://www.csectioncomics.com/search/label/Smartphones

    Well, I found it quite amusing and apt.

    I suspect that RIMM are not going for the same segment as the Apple iPad. I would be surprised if people really thought that RIMM expected to knock Apple off #1 in their home segment.

    I can't help feeling that rather a lot of the reviews have been trying to evaluate the Playbook as if it were intended to be something else.

    There are about 60M Blackberry users, who probably would define quite a nice set of starting segments to sell into, so the "tethered" aspect may be a virtue in that market, not a deficit.

    I think that it will be very interesting to hear how existing Blackberry users find it, when using it the way that it was intended.

    However a side point I would add, is that Blackberry owners may well delay purchase due to some of the (slightly partisan on occasions!) reviews in the financial press.

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2011, at 8:56 PM, punyhuman wrote:

    If I may add a 6th dumb move: shares of OCZ Technology (NASDAQ:OCZ) dropped from $10.40 to a low of $6.25 on Wednesday due to a scathing report on Seeking Alpha accusing the company of fraud. The report was written by an outfit called Copperfield Research, whose previous article on Ebix (NASDAQ:EBIX) triggered a plunge of ~26% in the stock price. Analysts covering OCZ are defending the company and Copperfield's report is being criticized as a "short attack," but the damage is done; OCZ closed at $7.49 on Thursday.

    (Disclosure: I am long OCZ, so Wednesday was a painful day.)

  • Report this Comment On April 21, 2011, at 9:20 PM, buffalonate wrote:

    BP wasn't doing the drilling Transocean was. I don't know why BP was getting all the blame to begin with. BP contracted to have someone come in and drill a well and they screwed up the job.

  • Report this Comment On April 29, 2011, at 7:57 AM, David369 wrote:

    I don't know why the government/media didn't go against both BP & Transocean. They were "married" at the site so to speak, let them both pay.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1479473, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 6:51:40 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 9 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
AMZN $212.89 Down -2.35 -1.09%
Amazon.com CAPS Rating: ***
RIG $43.14 Up +0.01 +0.02%
Transocean, Inc. CAPS Rating: *****
RIMM $11.00 Up +0.29 +2.71%
Research In Motion… CAPS Rating: *
SNDA $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Shanda Interactive… CAPS Rating: ***
BP $38.36 Up +0.13 +0.34%
BP p.l.c. (ADR) CAPS Rating: ****
CSTR $60.66 Up +1.26 +2.12%
Coinstar, Inc. CAPS Rating: ***
NFLX $70.22 Down -0.05 -0.07%
Netflix CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement