Recs

6

Will Linn Energy Look Good in the Long Run?

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

With Linn Energy (Nasdaq: LINE  ) entering the Bakken shale oil play, it seems that the company is full of potential. But how well will investors gain from the stock? A few important numbers offer some perspective, and those numbers are looking pretty good.

Here comes the science
Revenues haven't been steady since the company went public in 2006. The top line has recovered well since a 2009 slump, which was due to the drastic fall in oil prices during the recession. Fools should note that Linn has been unable to convert revenues into net income, but given the current state of the global energy market, I don't see any reason that Linn won't be able to maintain its momentum.

With acquisitions worth $3 billion in its kitty and total reserves of up to 2.6 trillion cubic feet equivalent (Tcfe) at the end of 2010, the company faces high expectations to deliver. Since this is a relatively new company, a large amount of debt need not be taken as a complete negative. But with long-term debt of $2.7 billion on its balance sheet, Linn must ramp up production to justify this figure.

There are a few things I find attractive about Linn. EBITDA, the margin of cash income, stands at an impressive 64%. Linn is comfortably meeting its interest expenses, with a healthy EBITDA-to-interest expense ratio of 2.3. And the stock has been outperforming the market consistently for most of the past year. I think investors will start seeing some of the company's revenue trickling down into net income.

As for valuation, the consensus estimate on the two-year forward P/E is 16.7, while competitors Anadarko Petroleum (NYSE: APC  ) and Forest Oil (NYSE: FST  ) stand at 20.3 and 14.9, respectively. That's not too bad. In fact, based on that number, the stock looks relatively undervalued next to its peers. However, Linn's three-year PEG ratio of 1.58 suggests that you're paying a bit of a premium for what analysts are expecting in terms of growth. And considering that Linn's return on equity stands at -4.4%, I'm not entirely sure the stock is appropriately priced for the time being, especially after taking a look at the company's operational history.

A Foolish bottom line
Despite the issues I'm seeing here, I do foresee positive changes in these figures, by virtue of Linn's oil reserves alone. Its free cash flow reserves stood at an impressive $197 million at the end of 2010. That's a vast improvement from $38 million the year before, and it reflects the company's improving financial position. With the current strong run in oil prices, this company looks pretty good in the long term.

Want to read more about Linn Energy? Add it to My Watchlist, which will find all of our Foolish analysis on this stock.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool contributor Isac Simon owns no shares of any of the companies mentioned in this article.

Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On April 22, 2011, at 10:20 PM, zorro6204 wrote:

    I just don't believe these articles, one after another, that display zero knowledge of how MLP's work. Again, you cannot analyze a company like LINE from the GAAP financials, due to wild distortions in the way hedging derivatives are accounted for. LINE's cash flow was NOT materially lower in 2009 than in 2010, despite the crash in energy prices, because it was forward hedged several years, and remains so today. The "top line" meant nothing.

    To repeat once again, from 2008 to 2010, LINE recorded $999,616, $(298,192) and $(114,288) of net income, and operating cash flow per the financials of $179,515, $426,804, $270,918, respectively, which makes no practical sense. It "lost" money in 2009, but more than doubled operating cash flow off a billion profit year? You're looking at the wrong metrics, what matters for continuing operations is distributable cash flow (DCF), which is disclosed separately from the financials.

    In reality, LINE had a very steady three years, covering its distributions per unit of $2.52, $2.52 and $2.55 per unit with DCF every single quarter. Repeat, it paid $2.52 per unit in 2009, more than covered by cash flow. Slump? Here comes the science? I give up.

  • Report this Comment On April 22, 2011, at 11:31 PM, Peckerpimple wrote:

    Turdfool,

    I dont want income as I have 76k in distributions coming from LINE. I want distribution coverage, hedging out to 2016 or later, increased distributions, additional production where there is low risk of dry holes, and additional accretive purchases, bolt ons and continued tax shelter on my current distributions and a bit of help from Linn people with the ridiculous taxes which California takes, about $800 for 2010.

    You just don't get it or the publish or perish imperative of a journalist is blocking your understanding. Are you young and dumb?

  • Report this Comment On April 25, 2011, at 3:52 PM, loubuster wrote:

    i notice that community comments go unanswered by this author, one would think that the Motley Fool editor would offer visibility to the community when one of its author's is flagged as inaccurate. What goes on here?

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1480326, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 6:55:22 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 9 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
LINE $36.03 Up +0.01 +0.03%
Linn Energy, LLC CAPS Rating: *****
FST $8.43 Up +0.22 +2.68%
Forest Oil Corp CAPS Rating: ****
APC $63.08 Down -0.57 -0.90%
Anadarko Petroleum… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement