Recs

5

America's $10.8 Billion Boondoggle

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

"A camel is a horse designed by committee." -- Anonymous

The Pentagon knows this maxim all too well. According to DefenseNews.com last week, the U.S. Army will soon launch a $10.8 billion project to "upgrade" 60,000 Humvees with new armor. In the process, I fear they'll just create something weird, ungainly, and not terribly useful.

"Wouldn't it be neat if … "
The Army wants to make Humvees more or less as tough as the mine-resistant, ambush-protected vehicles (MRAPs) manufactured by General Dynamics (NYSE: GD  ) , Navistar (NYSE: NAV  ) , and Force Protection (Nasdaq: FRPT  ) . But they also want to keep those Humvees lighter than the Oshkosh (NYSE: OSK  ) -built "M-ATV," the smallest MRAP.

Good luck with that.

The Humvee was designed to be a 21st century upgrade of the WWII Army Jeep, and it achieved that goal. But the Humvee was designed to move people and supplies, not traipse through minefields.

For that mission, the Army invented the MRAP, which has an admirable record of getting blown up by Iraqi IEDs, and surviving. Alas, MRAPs weigh too much and guzzle gas.

To fix this problem, the Army asked General D, Navistar, and Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT  ) to design a Joint Light Tactical Vehicle that would be survivable, like an MRAP, but lighter and more fuel efficient. So far, the project is flailing. Not a single variant has achieved the Pentagon's weight limit. Already, deficit hawks in Congress are calling for JLTV's termination.

The $10.8 billion camel
Are you seeing the pattern yet? You can build a bomb-resistant truck, but it'll weigh a ton. Or you can build a light truck, but it'll be vulnerable to mines. Try to do both things at once, and you've got a problem. Problem is, the Army's now trying to do just that. Compounding their error, they're not even designing a bomb-proof jeep from the ground up. Instead, they're taking an existing Humvee chassis, never designed to survive an IED blast, and trying to pimp the ride to give it MRAP-survivability.

It won't work. It's expensive, and a dumb idea.

In killing General Electric's (NYSE: GE  ) "alternative" F-35 engine earlier this year, Congress demonstrated that expensive, dumb ideas can't survive in an era of $1.3 trillion deficits. My advice: Don't bet on any defense contractor winning a Humvee upgrade contract. This project is doomed.

Meanwhile, MRAPs may have a future, and Oshkosh has taken pole position on this vehicle's evolution. Keep a close eye on its progress by adding Oshkosh to your Fool Watchlist.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own shares of any company named above, but The Fool owns shares of General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, and Oshkosh. Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 04, 2011, at 4:35 PM, jastoneii wrote:

    The presumption of your article is that current technologies do not exist that can give the HMMWV the level of IED blast protection of an MRAP. I believe you presumption is incorrect. Cymat Technologies, in Canada, makes Stabilizied Aluminum Foam (SAF). SAF has been tested by the NATC and shown to absorb over 80% of blast energy hitting a vehicle. Otokar, a Turkish armored vehicle manufacturer, already offers the Cobra II with SAF.

    As part of a double V-hull design, the cost of SAF for a Humvee would be $5k or less. Additionally, the weight component of the solution is not too overbearing. So, the blast aspect of the upgrade is very doable. As for the Pentagon's other upgrade requirements -- engine power, suspension, etc, I cannot offer informed comment.

    For full disclosure purposes, I do own Cymat stock.

  • Report this Comment On May 07, 2011, at 8:47 AM, midwestsensible wrote:

    Understand and appreciate the edgy tone of the fool, however, Rick Smith should check his facts before he spouts off snarky comments on defense industry projects. Please go back and check who the current Technology Development phase contractors are for JLTV you missed a few. Don't think that this adds to his credibility as a commentator. The defense development process in this country is complex due to shortcomings in our political process, budgeting practices, military administration and defense industry. Not to mention that the problems are complex! Snarky milisecond long attention span commentators do not add to the solution, but are part of the problem.

  • Report this Comment On May 07, 2011, at 9:04 AM, buffalonate wrote:

    The alternative engine competition was not stupid. Competition creates better product at lower prices. GE wanted to do a fixed price contract that was much cheaper than the Pratt contract. The alternative engine was already 90% paid for so why cancel it now when they are close to reaping the rewards.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1488202, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 9:32:21 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 12 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:01 PM
LMT $82.71 Down -0.66 -0.79%
Lockheed Martin Co… CAPS Rating: ****
NAV $28.11 Up +0.07 +0.25%
Navistar Internati… CAPS Rating: **
OSK $20.85 Down -0.30 -1.42%
Oshkosh Corporatio… CAPS Rating: ***
FRPT.DL $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Force Protection CAPS Rating: ***
GD $63.58 Up +0.24 +0.38%
General Dynamics C… CAPS Rating: ****
GE $19.20 Down -0.05 -0.26%
General Electric C… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement