Recs

2

Does This Mean Ebix Will Burn You?

There's no foolproof way to know the future for Ebix (Nasdaq: EBIX  ) or any other company. However, certain clues may help you see potential stumbles before they happen -- and before your stock craters as a result. Rest assured: Even if you're not monitoring these metrics, short-sellers are.

A cloudy crystal ball
I often use accounts receivable and days sales outstanding to judge a company's current health and future prospects. It's an important step in separating the pretenders from the market's best stocks. Alone, AR -- the amount of money owed the company -- and DSO -- the number of days' worth of sales owed to the company -- don't tell you much. However, by considering the trends in AR and DSO, you can sometimes get a window onto the future.

Sometimes, problems with AR or DSO simply indicate a change in the business (like an acquisition), or lax collections. However, AR that grows more quickly than revenue, or ballooning DSO, can also suggest a desperate company that's trying to boost sales by giving its customers overly generous payment terms. Alternately, it can indicate that the company sprinted to book a load of sales at the end of the quarter, like used-car dealers on the 29th of the month. (Sometimes, companies do both.)

Why might an upstanding firm like Ebix do this? For the same reason any other company might: to make the numbers. Investors don't like revenue shortfalls, and employees don't like reporting them to their superiors.

Is Ebix sending any potential warning signs? Take a look at the chart below, which plots revenue growth against AR growth, and DSO:

anImage

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. FQ = fiscal quarter.

The standard way to calculate DSO uses average accounts receivable. I prefer to look at end-of-quarter receivables, but I've plotted both above.

Watching the trends
When that red line (AR growth) crosses above the green line (revenue growth), I know I need to consult the filings. Similarly, a spike in the blue bars (DSO) indicates a trend worth worrying about. As another reality check, it's reasonable to consider what a normal DSO figure might look like in this space.

Company

LFQ Revenue

DSO

 Ebix $40 69
 Automatic Data Processing (Nasdaq: ADP  ) $2,737 42
 Oracle (Nasdaq: ORCL  ) $8,764 46
 Lawson Software (Nasdaq: LWSN  ) $196 51

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. DSO calculated from average AR. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. LFQ = last fiscal quarter. Dollar figures in millions.

Differences in business models can generate variations in DSO, so don't consider this the final word -- just a way to add some context to the numbers. But let's get back to our original question: Will Ebix miss its numbers in the next quarter or two?

I would not be surprised if there were trouble ahead. For the last fully reported fiscal quarter, Ebix's year-over-year revenue grew 26.7%, and its AR grew 35.2%. That looks ok, but end-of-quarter DSO increased 6.6% over the prior-year quarter. It was up 15.8% versus the prior quarter. That demands a good explanation. Still, I'm no fortuneteller, and these are just numbers. Investors putting their money on the line always need to dig into the filings for the root causes and draw their own conclusions.

What now?
I use this kind of analysis to figure out which investments I need to watch more closely as I hunt the market's best returns. However, some investors actively seek out companies on the wrong side of AR trends in order to sell them short, profiting when they eventually fall. Which way would you play this one? Let us know in the comments below, or keep up with the stocks mentioned in this article by tracking them in our free watchlist service, My Watchlist.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Seth Jayson had no position in any company mentioned here at the time of publication. You can view his stock holdings here. He is co-advisor of Motley Fool Hidden Gems, which provides new small-cap ideas every month, backed by a real-money portfolio. The Motley Fool owns shares of Oracle and Ebix. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended Ebix and Automatic Data Processing. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On May 20, 2011, at 2:21 PM, AaronRogers wrote:

    I agree with your assertion that these issues are generally very troubling. In EBIX's case i am not so sure.

    Remember EBIX has made quite a few acquisitions and its possible the companies they acquired had these issues in order to dupe EBIX into buying them for a higher price. However, the models they bought will be accretive and these issues and profitability will abate with time. The synergies were the keys to the acquisitions and Robin (CEO) has a very good track record with regards to acquisitions and I believe until proven otherwise he deserves the benefit of the doubt.

    I also noticed (thank you for the due diligence that I am not skilled enough to do myself) that EBIX has been down this road before and did a very good job in the past of bringing these figures down. As a matter of fact the current areas are not at the highs of EBIX history. When you correlate these numbers by year and stock price you will notice that EBIX is about to have another big run if these figures normalize. Definately something to watch.

  • Report this Comment On May 20, 2011, at 8:34 PM, stareyz wrote:

    Compare this article to another article written by this author on Entropic Communications ( ENTR ) and MaxLinear. Article is almost a photocopy except stock ticker.

    It is about time Seth should stop writing these articles which makes no sense and misguide people.

  • Report this Comment On May 23, 2011, at 5:40 PM, Coyotemark wrote:

    Seth is definately shorting the stock and wants the price to go down. This is yet more negative propaganda to influence the stock price. I tried to follow the writing, but he doesn't make very strong points. The writing is very vague with a lack of purpose. Is he saying that we should sell Ebix because the DSO has risen? From what I have seen, EBIX has already take a huge hit (going down from 30) and has bottomed out. If the market turns around, I would not be surprised if EBIX takes off. It is a quality cheap stock that is worth buying into at these levels. stareyz is correct! Check out this link and see if you find anything familiar.

    http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2011/05/19/is-maxlinea...

  • Report this Comment On May 26, 2011, at 8:06 AM, TkNeo wrote:

    There was a similar article for CRNT a few months ago. I would like to see something other than AR, DSO trend.

  • Report this Comment On May 29, 2011, at 10:01 PM, dolvlob wrote:

    Yet another robo-article by Seth Jayson ...

    Anyone reading this article should be aware that this article and all the rest by Seth Jayson (TMFBent) are not written by a person. They are simply fill-in-the-blank articles pumped out by a computer in order to artificially inflate the activity at The Motley Fool. Similarly, all articles by Anand Chokkavelu (TMFBomb) and Dan Dzombak (TMFDanDzombak) are also fill-in-the-blank articles generated by a computer.

    It is a shame that The Motley Fool has had to stoop to this level.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1497456, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 7:32:17 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 10 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 3:59 PM
EBIX $17.93 Down -0.04 -0.22%
Ebix CAPS Rating: *****
ORCL $26.14 Up +0.02 +0.08%
Oracle Corp. CAPS Rating: ****
LWSN $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Lawson Software, I… CAPS Rating: *****
ADP $52.68 Down -0.47 -0.88%
Automatic Data Pro… CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement