Recs

2

How Fast Is the Cash at MasTec?

It takes money to make money. Most investors know that, but with business media so focused on the “how much,” very few investors bother to ask, “How fast?”

When judging a company's prospects, how quickly it turns cash outflows into cash inflows can be just as important as how much profit it’s booking in the accounting fantasy world we call "earnings." This is one of the first metrics I check when I'm hunting for the market's best stocks. Today, we'll see how it applies to MasTec (NYSE: MTZ  ) .

Let's break this down
In this series, we measure how swiftly a company turns cash into goods or services and back into cash. We'll use a quick, relatively foolproof tool known as the cash conversion cycle, or CCC for short.

Why does the CCC matter? The less time it takes a firm to convert outgoing cash into incoming cash, the more powerful and flexible its profit engine is. The less money is tied up in inventory and accounts receivable, the more it is available to grow the company, pay investors, or both.

To calculate the cash conversion cycle, add days inventory outstanding to days sales outstanding, then subtract days payable outstanding. Like golf, the lower your score here, the better.

Here’s the CCC for MasTec alongside the comparable figures from a few competitors and peers:

Company

TTM Revenue

TTM CCC

 MasTec $2,476  25
 Insituform Technologies (Nasdaq: INSU  ) $926  23
 Dycom Industries (NYSE: DY  ) $1,014  31
 General Dynamics (NYSE: GD  ) $32,514  95

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. Dollar amounts in millions. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. TTM = trailing 12 months.

For younger, fast-growth companies the CCC can give you valuable insight into the sustainability of that growth. A company that’s taking longer to make cash may need to tap financing to keep its momentum. For older, mature companies the CCC can tell you how well the company is managed. Firms that begin to lose control of the CCC may be losing their clout with their suppliers (who might be demanding stricter payment terms) and customers (who might be demanding more generous terms). Sometimes this can be an important signal of future distress -- one most investors are likely to miss.

While I find peer comparisons useful, I’m most interested in comparing a company’s CCC to its prior performance. Here’s where I believe all investors need to become trend-watchers. Sure, there may be legitimate reasons for an increase in the CCC, but all things being equal, I want to see this number stay steady or move downward over time.

anImage

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. Dollar amounts in millions. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Because of the seasonality in some businesses, the CCC for the TTM period strictly may not be comparable to the fiscal-year periods shown in the chart. Even the steadiest-looking businesses on an annual basis will experience some quarterly fluctuations in the CCC. To get an understanding of the usual ebb and flow at MasTec consult the quarterly period chart below.

anImage

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. Dollar amounts in millions. FQ = fiscal quarter.

On a 12-month basis, the trend at MasTec looks very good. At 25.4 days, it is 4.9 days better than the five-year average of 30.2 days. The biggest contributor to that improvement was DSO, which improved 16.1 days compared to the five-year average. That was partially offset by an 11.5-day increase in DPO.

Considering the numbers on a quarterly basis, the CCC trend at MasTec looks weak. At 38.6 days, it is 10.0 days worse than the average of the past eight quarters. Investors will want to keep an eye on this for the future to make sure it doesn't stray too far in the wrong direction. With quarterly CCC doing worse than average and the latest 12-month CCC coming in better, MasTec gets a mixed review in this cash-conversion checkup.

Though the CCC can take a little work to calculate, it’s definitely worth watching every quarter. You’ll be better informed about potential problems, and you'll improve your odds of finding the underappreciated home run stocks that provide the market's best returns.

To stay on top of the CCC for your favorite companies, just use the handy links below to add companies to your free watchlist.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Seth Jayson had no position in any company mentioned here at the time of publication. You can view his stock holdings here. He is co-advisor of Motley Fool Hidden Gems, which provides new small-cap ideas every month, backed by a real-money portfolio. The Motley Fool owns shares of General Dynamics and Insituform Technologies. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 20, 2011, at 10:39 AM, dumbdumb74 wrote:

    Thanks for the article. I find the CCC approach interesting and hadn't considered it before, at least in a quant approach. One interesting note while applying this to a company like mtz is that they're a pretty acquisitive business and have acquired into lines of business over the past few years where the customers are large utility or utility like companies, and while they do pay their bills 100% of the time, they don't always do so in a +15 manner, which extends the DSO, and a $2b company like mtz can not push back too hard on customers to reduce a/r dso. Just a comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 09, 2011, at 12:58 PM, crusherny wrote:

    Thanks for the article. Interesting that dumbdumb74 states that MTZ pay their bills 100%; however, MTZ has been sued over 200 times in Florida. You may want to review this blog that contacted me, www.globetecexposed.wordpress.com If it is true that they acquire companies and take in their cash, but do not pay the owners/sellers what they are rightfully owed or buy inventory, etc, I guess they would have a CCC better than most. Just a comment.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1508791, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 9:15:39 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 11 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
MTZ $16.41 Down -0.08 -0.49%
MasTec, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
GD $63.58 Up +0.24 +0.38%
General Dynamics C… CAPS Rating: ****
DY $20.67 Down -0.03 -0.14%
Dycom Industries,… CAPS Rating: ***
AEGN $16.50 Up +0.08 +0.49%
Aegion Corp. CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement