Recs

5

This Just In: Upgrades and Downgrades

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

At The Motley Fool, we poke plenty of fun at Wall Street analysts and their endless cycle of upgrades, downgrades, and "initiating coverage at neutral." Today, we'll show you whether those bigwigs actually know what they're talking about. To help, we've enlisted Motley Fool CAPS to track the long-term performance of Wall Street's best and worst.

19% undervalued? Are you Sirius?
Shareholders of satellite radio star Sirius XM Radio (Nasdaq: SIRI  ) have reason to smile this morning. Yesterday, in the middle of the trading session, JANCO Partners upped its rating on the stock from a half-hearted "accumulate" to an honest-to-goodness "buy." Why? According to JANCO, even after rocketing up from the $1 range to $2-a-share-and-change, Sirius is still cheap.

The catalyst for this announcement came in the form of an offer by General Motors (NYSE: GM  ) to provide car buyers three free months of Sirius when they buy any used car from a GM dealer. Granted, this isn't a totally new idea. As fellow Fool Rick Munarriz pointed out last month, Sirius already has similar "certified pre-owned" deals with BMW (OTC: BAMXF.PK), Volvo, and CarMax (NYSE: KMX  ) , too. However, the GM announcement is Sirius' first with a Big 3 automaker. Importantly, GM's offer applies not just to GM cars and trucks, but to any used car, whatever the make, sold at GM dealerships (so long as they have a Sirius radio installed).

That sounds like a caveat, but as JANCO points out, it's not a big one: "[Sirius] has over 60% market penetration of new cars." As a result, "there are millions of satellite-radio equipped cars ... in the used car market" to which this offer could apply. Returning these cars to Sirius membership offers a chance to snag millions of new subscribers at a "low acquisition cost and higher incremental margins." High enough, apparently, that JANCO believes it will turn Sirius into a $2.50 stock within 12 months.

Is JANCO right about that?

Let's go to the tape
I have to warn you, Fools, initial indications are not good. It's been well over a year since JANCO stopped issuing timely updates on its recommendations through Briefing.com, so we can't be sure how it's been doing lately. But at last report, its record on media stocks like Sirius was pretty iffy:

Company

JANCO Rating

CAPS Rating
(out of 5)

JANCO's Picks Lagged S&P by

Comcast Outperform ** <1 point
Liberty Media Outperform *** 20 points
Lions Gate Outperform ** 33 points

Historically, only about 44% of JANCO's recommendations in the media industry managed to outperform the market. It's even under water on its only publicly announced Sirius pick, a 2008 recommendation to buy the stock. So you may be surprised to learn that I actually agree with JANCO this time.

Huh?
I know. This is probably a bit of a shock, coming from a value investor like me. Plain-vanilla value seekers probably look at Sirius and its "100" P/E ratio and dismiss the stock out of hand. But the honest truth is that when I look at Sirius' numbers, they just don't scare me.

Consider: While Sirius reported earning only $80 million over the past year, this is only a GAAP number. From the perspective of the actual free cash flow it's generating, Sirius is actually a whole lot more profitable than it looks. Free cash flow for the past 12 months came to $321 million (literally four times as much as reported "profits"). Based on that number, I tend to look at Sirius not as a "100 P/E stock," but as a company trading for 25 times the amount of free cash it earns in a year. A company that, by the way, is expected to grow its profits at 30% per year over the next five years.

I know this is going to sound crazy ... but at the rate its free cash flow is improving, I actually think I like Sirius more here at $2 a share than I did back when it only cost a dollar.

Foolish final thought
Mind you, I'm not saying Sirius is an obvious buy at today's price. The company still has to hit that 30% growth target to justify its valuation. But if you take this week's GM announcement, and extrapolate it to include potential used car-activation deals Sirius could later sign with Ford (NYSE: F  ) and Toyota (NYSE: TM  ) , for example, I think the growth is there for the taking.

Automakers like Ford, Toyota, and GM have a lot to gain from this tie-up with Sirius. The extra perk will help to move metal. Meanwhile, offering freebies to used car buyers fixes a nagging problem for Sirius: When a car owner sells her car, she doesn't want to pay for somebody else to enjoy the Sirius service, so she naturally turns it off. But the new owner may not know how to turn it back on -- or may know how, but not be inclined to pay for an unknown. Sirius' initiative promises to "monetize" all those inactive hunks of Sirius-receiving electronics out there in the used car market.

Three months of free service could be enough to convert a Sirius agnostic into a Sirius fan of the service. It may also be enough to convert Sirius into a $2.50 stock.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool contributor Rich Smith does not own (nor is he short) shares of any company named above.The Motley Fool owns shares of Ford Motor and Motley Fool newsletter serviceshave recommended buying shares of General Motors and Ford Motor.

You can find Rich on CAPS, publicly pontificating under the handle TMFDitty, where he's currently ranked No. 441 out of more than 170,000 members. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 23, 2011, at 5:46 PM, multi007 wrote:

    I wonder if JANCO would have made the upgrade if the stock price was still around $2.44? From a 52 week high of $2.44 to its belief that it would be $2.50 within 12 months isnt really a stretch... Its already recovered about 20 cents since dropping to $1.88... seems like they are just riding it back up.

  • Report this Comment On June 25, 2011, at 3:46 AM, kmacattack wrote:

    I think a $2.50 price target is extremely conservatie. I really believe that the stock will be above $3 by year end. The only "glitch" I see as a possiblilty is if the economy drops into a "double dip", and unfortunately, there are certain political forces in the country that would like to see the economy tank just so they can deliver the country to their corporate sponsors in the next election. The deficit problem is going to be around for awhile, but the best remedy is a robust economy. The last boom we had was during the Clinton years, despite the warnings of Rush Limbaugh and GW Bush 1 in his pre-elecion debates with Clinton that he would create a horrible recession or even a depression if minimum wages were increased and if top tier tax rates were bumped back up to the Reagan levels of 39 percent, still about half the pre- Reagan level of 70 percent. Clinton was right, Limbaugh and the republicans were wrong and EVERYBODY PROSPERED, RICH AND POOR ALIKE.

    If the economy is at least decent, Sirius is poised to experience explosive growth for a number of reasons. SIRI has many possibilities for generating revenue, and their "nut" was covered after the first 15 million subscribers, so with every new subscriber, their gross profit grows. They are near 10 percent penetration of all the cars on American roads, they will be allowed to increase prices in january, they are an attractive buyout candidate, thier debt is being reduced dramatically, they have favorable tax status for a long time to come, etc. This is a great time to sell Sirius puts, which I have done several times in the past year of so, and made a very handome profit. With the stock doubling in the last year (since I bought in) and with my option profits, I literally own Sirius for about 25 cents on the current dollar valuation. Out of the 15 stocks in my protfolio, this is my favorite, and will, I believe, continue to be a stellar performer for years to come.

  • Report this Comment On June 25, 2011, at 3:58 AM, kmacattack wrote:

    Expanding on Clinton's deficit reduction, this 'BIG SPENDING LIBERAL" took the $8 trillion inherited deficit from the Reagan/Bush 1 twelve year period and produced a $4.25 trillion SURPLUS in 8 years. If the politicians would stop giving away the treasury to political friends, we could reduce deficits dramatically. Social Security and medicare could be funded FOREVER if only the cap of $106,000 were removed on Social Security contributions. Something is wrong when a man making $106,000 contributes $6,800 to Social Security, and the CEO of Chesapeake Energy, who will make about $21 million this year, also contributes the same $6,800. I don't hear politicians from either party discussing removing this cap, but since they both depend on funding from high income CEO's, it's understandable why they don't talk about this solution. This is a perfect example of how much it costs Americans to allow unlimited "contributions" to political campaigns. I prefer the old fashioned term BRIBERY to describe the policy, practiced by both parties. Wouldn't it be great if people could be elected to political office based on their ability to sell voters on the validity of their proposals for solving the country's problems, instead of relying on corrupt campaign "contributions" which probably cost Americans $500 in deficits for every dollar contributed to political campaigns..

  • Report this Comment On June 25, 2011, at 10:47 AM, diver92 wrote:

    Unlimited contributions to political campaigns is a mistake, you are buying your next leader, our leaders of past decades would roll over in their graves

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1511300, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 1:33:00 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 16 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
SIRI $1.93 Down -0.06 -3.02%
Sirius XM Radio CAPS Rating: **
KMX $29.11 Up +0.09 +0.31%
CarMax, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****
TM $76.80 Down -0.40 -0.52%
Toyota Motor Corp… CAPS Rating: ****
F $10.60 Up +0.01 +0.09%
Ford CAPS Rating: ****
GM $22.44 Up +0.40 +1.81%
General Motors Com… CAPS Rating: **

Advertisement