Recs

11

It's Good to Be a Banker

Banking is big business. It's profitable business. It's often easy money.

A study by the National Bureau of Economic Research released last week helps show why. In a nationwide survey of more than 1,000 respondents, NBER set out to see how much people know about their own finances. The results were ugly:

When asked whether they have an interest-only mortgages or a mortgage with an interest-only option ... 20 percent did not know the answer to this question.

When asked how good they are at dealing with day-to-day financial matters such as checking accounts, credit cards, and tracking expenses, close to half of respondents who have credit cards and checking accounts (49 percent) gave themselves the top score of 7. However, one-quarter of these respondents engage in behavior that generates fees or high costs, such as using credit cards for cash advances, paying a late payment or over-the-limit fee, and overdrawing the checking account.

About 20 percent of those who have auto loans do not know the interest rate they pay. About 10 percent do not know the interest rate on their mortgages. Of the 46 percent of credit card holders who don't make their credit card payment in full, 12 percent don't know the interest rate on their credit card with the largest balance.

When asked if retirement assets are invested primarily in a life-cycle or target-date fund ... 37 percent stated they did not know the answer to this question.

[And probably the most damning:] When asked to assess their financial knowledge, most respondents give themselves high scores.

This is why it's good to be a banker. There isn't a more profitable combination than raging confidence mixed with blind ignorance. Bank of America (NYSE: BAC  ) , Citigroup (NYSE: C  ) , JPMorgan Chase (NYSE: JPM  ) , and Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC  ) focus a tremendous portion of their assets on consumer finance. Can you blame them? You often hear outrage over banks raising fees and jacking up interest rates. Part of this is justified by the cost of business. But part has to do with the results from this survey.

Banks raise fees because they can -- and a lot of customers don't even know it. In the 1990s, a tape recording caught a group of bankers bragging that the goal was "to lure people into the calm and then just totally [$%@#] 'em." When customers are unmindful of the fundamentals of their finances, achieving this is about as easy as it gets.

There's a comparison to draw here with the health-care system. One flaw of our health-care system is that those getting care often have no idea what it costs. Even those with health insurance are often oblivious to costs because employers pay the bulk of premiums out of employees' sight. Business works best when all participants are properly informed. Whether it's consumers' fault or not, many aren't. This causes people to make all kinds of irrational decisions, and leads to all kinds of problems -- spiraling medical costs in one area, and frequent financial crises in another.

What's the solution? Part of me says: to each his own. If you want to be oblivious to your finances, do it -- and pay the price. Another part of me isn't as cold, and knows that the consequences of other people's bad financial decisions spread far beyond those who misbehave.

Last week, my colleague Chuck Saletta said that "when an individual or a private company does stupid stuff, the consequences are limited to the reach of whoever screwed up." I couldn't disagree more. Just four banks hold assets worth over 50% of the nation's GDP. Every inch of the global economy feels it when these banks do stupid stuff. Even if I behave, it's in my interest to make sure you -- the banks' customers – do, too. Part of that includes making an effort to ensure everyone is informed about their finances. That's why I agree with my other colleagues Brian Richards and Ilan Moscovitz: The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau looks smarter by the day.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool contributor Morgan Housel owns B of A preferred. Follow him on Twitter @TMFHousel. The Fool owns shares of JPMorgan Chase. The Fool owns shares of and has opened a short position on Bank of America. The Fool owns shares of and has created a ratio put spread position on Wells Fargo. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On June 27, 2011, at 5:36 PM, xetn wrote:

    The key to the banking system (at least the big banks) is the Federal Reserve which was created by the big NYC banks for the big NYC banks, to be lender of last resort. Another key to the banking system is the FDIC which takes over "problem banks" and hands the assets over the the big banks while passing the losses on to the taxpayers.

    Right now, the banks have been provided excess reserves by the Fed and they are letting those excess reserves sit at the Fed and earn about .25% interest with no risk. At the same time, as a result of Dodd-Frank, they are upping most if not all of the fees they change to their customers.

    The big banks can take all the risk without any downside because they know they will get bailed out.

  • Report this Comment On June 27, 2011, at 8:05 PM, mastianica wrote:

    newww work

  • Report this Comment On June 27, 2011, at 8:56 PM, rd80 wrote:

    "Part of that includes making an effort to ensure everyone is informed about their finances."

    Why do you assume banking customers who overdraw, etc. will pay any more attention to whatever the CFPB offers up than they do to the wealth of financial management information currently available at no cost?

  • Report this Comment On June 27, 2011, at 9:13 PM, TiaCyn wrote:

    I've taught business math to high school students and own a business that takes orders from people over the phone. Both situations have taught me how unsophisticated we are in general when it comes to money and finances.

    I suspect that like sex and marriage, money management is assumed to be something taught in th home. But somewhere between the decrease in time parents and children spend with each other and the increasing complexity of banking, insurance, and credit, this teaching is not happening.

    Until we demand a curriculum in our schools that can keep up with how clever our financial institutions have become, I'm afraid we'll continue to be as vulnerable as country bumpkins at a carnival side show.

  • Report this Comment On June 27, 2011, at 10:02 PM, skypilot2005 wrote:

    Morgan,

    How about a citation or reference to this: “In the 1990s, a tape recording caught a group of bankers bragging that the goal was "to lure people into the calm and then just totally [$%@#] 'em.".

    Do you contend that this is common among all bankers and why?

    If it is why wouldn’t you recommend people join credit unions?

    I refer you to this blog;

    http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2011/06/22/the-dangers...

    We’ve covered this subject but it you want to go over it again, here is a portion of one of my posts:

    “I also, applaud The Fool for running this piece and having a comments section. By the end of this week we will be better informed on the issues surrounding the creation of the CFPB. Isn’t that really what The Fool is all about? This is much better than a one sided pronouncement and is a service to our Fool Community.

    According to many posts here, predatory lending is a common practice.

    Why aren’t the current laws being enforced?

    The Department of Justice has a budget of over $27 Billion.

    The Department of Treasury has a budget of well over $10 billion.

    Some contend many of us are being taken advantage of by financial institutions because of sophisticated techniques commonly used by them.

    The Department of Education has a budget of well over $69 billion.

    Still others contend that creating another bureaucracy and spending $340 million every year to start is going to “make the difference” in protecting consumers and providing greater pricing transparency?

    History does not support that position.

    The banks aren’t treating you right? Join a Credit Union. I’ve been a member of one for over 25 years and it offers better rates and lower fees. Hit the “evil” banks where it hurts, in the pocket book. Stop being a whinny “victim” and take control of your future.

    The CFPB has a fashionable name but is not needed.

    Fool On

    Sky Pilot

    Proud Credit Union Member

    Disclosure: I do not work for a credit Union nor do I know anyone that does. Although, I wouldn’t mind having lunch with teller #3….. “

    Sky Pilot

  • Report this Comment On June 27, 2011, at 10:23 PM, TMFHousel wrote:

    ^ The book Econned by Yves Smith, page 129. I think it's probably more common than most assume. And I think credit unions are great.

  • Report this Comment On June 27, 2011, at 11:07 PM, bbell46356 wrote:

    Looking to Big Government for a solution is nearly certain to fail. The real problem, as is pointed out in the article is that 4 banks control too many assets.

    The government created this situation or at the very least allowed this situation to occur. Part of the reason is that big government proponents would like government to control every aspect of each individual's life from our education to our finances to even what we eat.

    There is a cliche that says you can't fix stupid. Any person who pays more than they have to hurts only themselves. But if you are the government, or a big bank, you can take stupid people's money to enrich yourselves and your friends.

    It's a whole lot easier to have 4 banks to control. Politicians will tell the public how bad all of these banks are screwing them, then justify a huge beauracracy to regulate them under the guise of consumer protection. Then they write a 40 volume book of regulations that only the four banks can afford to decipher and those regulations will contain enough loopholes to make it even easier for the banks to screw the people than it was in the first place.

    If the banks are too big - split them up and skip the magic show. We won't need another huge Federal Agency and the savings there might even be enough to pay off a few credit cards.

  • Report this Comment On June 28, 2011, at 8:09 AM, skypilot2005 wrote:

    On June 27, 2011, at 10:23 PM, TMFHousel wrote:

    "And I think credit unions are great. "

    I just thought of something. What do you think of putting a piece together comparing banks and credit unions from a consumer perspective?

    I think it may benefit many younger Fools.

    In my State, anyone can belong to a credit union. Many are “community” based. That is if, you are a resident of the County (ies) they are located in you can join.

    A suggested title:

    Is it Foolish to belong to a credit union?

    Is Credit Union membership Foolish?

    Credit unions or banks, which offer the best value?

    I PROMISE if you do, I will not post that it was my idea.

    :)

    Sky Pilot

  • Report this Comment On June 29, 2011, at 4:02 PM, garifolle wrote:

    It is certainly good to be a banker!

    Not so much because of the lesson learned form the bailout.

    But because law just is not an obstacle to any wrong doing.

    JPM once again, received today a little clap on the hand, a settlement, like always, that is so little when one compares to the profits made by the bank, that lead to this law suit.

    The "punishments" are included in the "Risk-Reward Ratio", like the fees are included in the transactions that you make when you buy or sell stocks.

    Law suits always end with settlements, never in trials in front of juries.

    Small employees might be fired, and the appearance of justice should be saved?

  • Report this Comment On June 30, 2011, at 4:30 PM, MHenage wrote:

    Just a point lest we all assume every bank is the same just something to think about...If you overdraw your account and have an account at a big bank versus a credit union and have no overdraft protection what is the difference in what happens?...nothing..in most cases the customer ends up paying 1 or more overdraft fees.

    I worked at a bank for 10 years as both a manager and customer service rep, the goal was always to let our clients know about additional products and services, but many times clients would say they were not interested or didn't think they needed the product or service. I can't tell you how many times I was frustrated because I recommended some type of overdraft protection and a client would say they didn't need it only to see them get overdrawn and then complain that they didn't want to pay overdraft fees.

    In cases of deliberately misleading a client I agree throw that bank under the bus. Many times though as the article pointed out we are overconfident in our own ignorance and this leads us into situations where we feel wronged because we did something dumb. Long story short sometimes people have to grow up and accept their own mistakes instead of looking for someone to blame it on.

  • Report this Comment On July 02, 2011, at 11:44 PM, ershler wrote:

    TiaCyn makes a good point about better financial education in school but I don't think including it in the curriculum will be enough. Math and science requirements are already included and just like financial knowledge the only thing we rate high in is self-confidence. I'm blaming that on to many participation awards and sports where everyone gets to play and nobody keeps score.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1512443, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 1:42:22 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 16 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:02 PM
JPM $33.50 Down -0.47 -1.38%
JPMorgan Chase & C… CAPS Rating: ***
WFC $31.86 Up +0.05 +0.16%
Wells Fargo & Comp… CAPS Rating: ****
BAC $7.15 Up +0.01 +0.14%
Bank of America Co… CAPS Rating: ***
C $26.47 Down -0.19 -0.71%
Citigroup Inc CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement