Here's How Compagnie Generale de Geophysique-Veritas May Be Failing You

Margins matter. The more Compagnie Generale de Geophysique-Veritas (NYSE: CGV  ) keeps of each buck it earns in revenue, the more money it has to invest in growth, fund new strategic plans, or (gasp!) distribute to shareholders. Healthy margins often separate pretenders from the best stocks in the market.  That's why we check up on margins at least once a quarter in this series. I'm looking for the absolute numbers, comparisons to sector peers and competitors, and any trend that may tell me how strong Compagnie Generale de Geophysique-Veritas' competitive position could be.

Here's the current margin snapshot for Compagnie Generale de Geophysique-Veritas and some of its sector and industry peers and direct competitors:

Company

TTM Gross Margin

TTM Operating Margin

TTM Net Margin

 Compagnie Generale de Geophysique-Veritas 18.2% 6.3% (3.7%)
 ION Geophysical (NYSE: IO  ) 39.1% 15.7% 7.7%
 Global Geophysical Services (NYSE: GGS  ) 18.2% 2.3% (11.0%)
 Geokinetics (AMEX: GOK  ) 18.7% (14.0%) (21.7%)

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Unfortunately, that table doesn't tell us much about where Compagnie Generale de Geophysique-Veritas has been, or where it's going. A company with rising gross and operating margins often fuels its growth by increasing demand for its products. If it sells more units while keeping costs in check, its profitability increases. Conversely, a company with gross margins that inch downward over time is often losing out to competition, and possibly engaging in a race to the bottom on prices. If it can't make up for this problem by cutting costs -- and most companies can't -- then both the business and its shares face a decidedly bleak outlook.

Of course, over the short term, the kind of economic shocks we recently experienced can drastically affect a company's profitability. That's why I like to look at five fiscal years' worth of margins, along with the results for the trailing 12 months, or TTM, the last fiscal year, and last fiscal quarter, or LFQ. You can't always reach a hard conclusion about your company's health, but you can better understand what to expect, and what to watch.

Here's the margin picture for Compagnie Generale de Geophysique-Veritas over the past few years:

Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. Dollar amounts in millions. FY= fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Because of seasonality in some businesses, the numbers for the last period on the right -- the TTM figures -- aren't always comparable to the FY results preceding them. To compare quarterly margins to their prior-year levels, consult this chart:

 Source: Capital IQ, a division of Standard & Poor's. Dollar amounts in millions. FQ = fiscal quarter.

Here's how the stats break down:

  • Over the past five years, gross margin peaked at 33.8% and averaged 28.4%. Operating margin peaked at 22.4% and averaged 16%. Net margin peaked at 12.8% and averaged 4.1%.
  • TTM gross margin is 18.2%, 1,020 basis points worse than the five-year average. TTM operating margin is 6.3%, 970 basis points worse than the five-year average. TTM net margin is -3.7%, 780 basis points worse than the five-year average.

With recent TTM operating margins below historical averages, Compagnie Generale de Geophysique-Veritas has some work to do.

If you take the time to read past the headlines and crack a filing now and then, you're probably ahead of 95% of the market's individual investors. To stay ahead, learn more about how I use analysis like this to help me uncover the best returns in the stock market.  Got an opinion on the margins at Compagnie Generale de Geophysique-Veritas? Let us know in the comments below.

Seth Jayson had no position in any company mentioned here at the time of publication. You can view his stock holdings here. He is co-advisor of Motley Fool Hidden Gems, which provides new small-cap ideas every month, backed by a real-money portfolio. The Motley Fool owns shares of Compagnie G and ION Geophysical. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (1) | Recommend This Article (0)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On July 12, 2011, at 10:54 PM, paulita8 wrote:

    Hi Seth,

    Interesting article. However, none of the three companies you chose to compare against CGGVeritas can't be considered direct competitors:

    ION - they mainly manufacture equipment and process seismic data.

    Global - they mainly acquire seismic data on land and shallow water

    Geokinetics - almost exclusively acquire land seismic data and maybe some processing

    They all compete against individual service divisions within the CGV group and ION competes directly against the manufacturing arm of CGV which is SERCEL - the largest seismic equipment manufacturer in the market.

    The question is - have you tried comparing CGV against PGS, WG (part of SLB group) or Fugro-Geoteam, the geophysical co of the Fugro group of companies. That would be more apples to apples.

    Thanks.

    George

Add your comment.

Sponsored Links

Leaked: Apple's Next Smart Device
(Warning, it may shock you)
The secret is out... experts are predicting 458 million of these types of devices will be sold per year. 1 hyper-growth company stands to rake in maximum profit - and it's NOT Apple. Show me Apple's new smart gizmo!

DocumentId: 1516300, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 10/21/2014 1:48:01 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...


Advertisement