Recs

3

It's Time for Netflix to Rethink Streaming

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

The fall from the top of the mountain has been fast and furious for Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX  ) investors over the last two months. This morning's announcement revealing the company would split into separate streaming and DVD-delivery businesses has provided some relief, but as fellow Fool Rick Munarriz pointed out, Netflix's problems are bigger than a quick fix.

As a former Netflix user who gave up on the service after a few months, maybe I can provide some insights to how the non-believers see Netflix. I gave up on the DVD and streaming service after running through all of the old movies I wanted to see, and becoming fed up with a disappointing streaming lineup. So how can Netflix get me back?

Now that Netflix has dropped the DVDs into a subsidiary to focus on the faster-growing streaming business, there are a few ways to make Netflix better. However, doing so might require a few changes to its seemingly untouchable business model.

Netflix's power goes to its head
The beautiful thing about Netflix's streaming model is that customers can get shows and movies anytime, on almost any Internet connected device. Netflix has penetrated Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) iPhones, iPods, and iPads along with Microsoft's (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) Xbox and Sony's Playstation. It offers content when I want, where I want. The concept couldn't get any better.

What isn't beautiful about Netflix is the content available for streaming. I originally signed up for Netflix to watch Showtime shows like Dexter and Weeds, but once you get hooked, Netflix comes up short by not offering more recent seasons. I understand Showtime's desire to sell DVD packages to those of us without Showtime on cable, but there must be another way!

Netflix apparently balked at Liberty Starz's insistence on a premium-pricing tier, instead of a $300 million-a-year fee for access to the Starz library. The company that created an innovative way to stream TV shows and movies just wasn't willing to come up with an innovative solution for an important content provider.

And this is where I think Netflix needs to consider its importance to customers.

Netflix isn't the only fish in the sea
I get the feeling that Netflix was feeling a little more powerful than it really was, after the company's stock run-up and the constant pats on the back to CEO Reed Hastings. But the recent subscriber news has to hurt, and with competitors like Hulu lurking in the background, there's no reason to think that Netflix has an impenetrable business.

After years of consolidation, most media is housed under Disney (NYSE: DIS  ) , Viacom, News Corp., Time Warner (NYSE: TWX  ) , and Comcast's (NYSE: CMCSA  ) NBC Universal. These players have all of the power when it comes to negotiations with cable companies, and now with Netflix. They could also create their own streaming services by building apps for Apple and Google (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) Android devices.

That's why it's paramount that Netflix come up with a way to provide multiple package options to customers. iTunes offers one-time rentals and purchases that Netflix can't currently match -- but why shouldn't it? How about a $10 fee for a Dexter Season 5 marathon, or $15 to catch up on True Blood?

Netflix could even let content providers create their own pricing, with a 30% margin for their trouble. That way, consumers could decide what price they're willing to pay for which content. With streaming, the cord is easy to cut, unlike cable, which packages hundreds of channels together. Content providers would have to quickly adjust to the changes in plan subscribers.

The bottom line: Netflix's single rate won't work forever.

The $76 billion gorilla
Let's not forget about the company Netflix should be scared of most in the content-distribution business: Apple.

Right now, Apple might not seem like a direct competitor. But with a few tweaks to the Apple TV and a few new content deals, Apple will be breathing down Netflix's neck. Apple has more than enough to spend on those deals, thanks to its $76 billion cash hoard. After redefining the music business, it only makes sense that Apple would do the same with TV shows and movies.

Outside the box
Netflix has ridden fixed content costs and rising customer numbers to success over the past few years. But now that its growth has slowed, it's time to rethink that model.

Content providers like Starz have started to reconsider their value to Netflix, as Big Media tries to forge a future for its industry.

Netflix needs to maintain its position at the center of that media future. It can only do so by expanding its offerings and its customers' options. In my mind, Netflix can remains relevant only if it can begin to replace cable for some customers. Those who want to see a show NOW, regardless of the channel, should be turning to Netflix first.

If Netflix could provide nearly every show or movie I want, whenever I want -- even at a higher price -- that would be a real game-changer.

Leave your thoughts on the future of Netflix in our comments section below, and add your favorite media stock to My Watchlist, and My Watchlist will find all of our Foolish analysis on this stock.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

The Motley Fool owns shares of Google, Microsoft, and Apple. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Apple, Netflix, Microsoft, Google, and Walt Disney, as well as buying puts in Netflix and creating bull call spread positions in Apple and Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days.

Fool contributor Travis Hoium owns shares of Disney. You can follow Travis on Twitter at @FlushDrawFool, check out his personal stock holdings or follow his CAPS picks at TMFFlushDraw. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 19, 2011, at 3:54 PM, jbcahill wrote:

    And with a bunch of different tiers, they become the internet version of a cable service provider! Which is exactley what I dont want and why I canceled my cable 8 months ago because of the excessive "nickel and dimeing". I have been a Netflix subscriber for over ten years, and in the last couple of years they seem to be doing everything they can to alienate their user base and drive away business.

  • Report this Comment On September 19, 2011, at 4:48 PM, ledm wrote:

    I agree. I have been with Netflix for a little less than ten years and what I love about Netflix now is that I can pay a flat fee and enjoy as many TV shows or movies I want. That is one of the major benefits of Netflix. While their selection is often disappointing, they are supposed to be adding much more content soon. I just feel that in this economy, it isn't wise to gamble on just what we will pay extra for. I know that is why I cancelled HBO, Showtime etc. on my cable. It got way too expensive. I am going to cancel cable next if their prices begin to increase. If they do decide to raise their prices, I can tell you this. If I do decide to pay their increase, they better have ANY obscure movie I can come up with on streaming because the first movie or TV show they do not have... I will cancel my membership.

  • Report this Comment On September 19, 2011, at 5:24 PM, mattack2 wrote:

    Wow.. You weren't able to find HUNDREDS of DVDs you wanted to watch? The main reason I created a separate profile years ago was to (mostly) separate TV shows and DVDs, and both are pretty much full (500 entries).

    I think their decision today is really lame.. but even saying that, I *disagree* with your statement "Netflix isn't the only fish in the sea".

    1) There aren't many other comparable DVD rental places *with the same catalog*. Blockbuster's DVD by mail service maybe... Redbox is fine, and cheap.. but if you want things BESIDES the blockbuster (no pun intended) of the week? or the *extras* DVDs, which I get from netflix often (I have 2 now).

    2) There aren't comparable streaming ALL YOU CAN EAT services. (I cancelled streaming BTW.. I still think their streaming "sucks less").

    3) NO COMMERCIALS. Hulu will not compare until there is a commercial free version.

  • Report this Comment On September 19, 2011, at 5:45 PM, CommonScents wrote:

    We're all trying to predict the future, and I reserve the right to be wrong. That being said, I don't see how the unlimited streaming business model will survive now that the content providers are no longer asleep at the wheel when negotiating these contracts.

    I think a baseline fee for some so-so quality unlimited streaming paired with paying for individual viewings of streaming premium content can be sustainable and has a market.

    Amazon basically already does this, but they aren't available on nearly enough platforms, and it might be a stretch to call their unlimited streaming content 'so-so'.

    If Amazon embraced the Vudu concept of "buying" an electronic copy (that you could watch anytime you wanted), you've suddenly created the equivalent hardcopy-to-digital transformation that's occurring with books.

    @mattac2k: I'm surprised that Netflix chose the radical price increase implementation over limited commercials. I still believe that the commercials would've been the lesser of the 2 evils in the eyes of customers.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1555709, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 3:10:16 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 17 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:00 PM
NFLX $70.22 Down -0.05 -0.07%
Netflix CAPS Rating: **
MSFT $29.06 Down -0.01 -0.03%
Microsoft Corp CAPS Rating: ****
TWX $34.70 Up +0.12 +0.35%
Time Warner CAPS Rating: ***
GOOG $591.53 Down -12.13 -2.01%
Google CAPS Rating: ****
AAPL $562.29 Down -3.03 -0.54%
Apple CAPS Rating: ***
DIS $44.50 Up +0.06 +0.14%
Walt Disney CAPS Rating: *****

Advertisement