Recs

8

How Valuable Is Penn West Petroleum?

Watch stocks you care about

The single, easiest way to keep track of all the stocks that matter...

Your own personalized stock watchlist!

It's a 100% FREE Motley Fool service...

Click Here Now

When it comes to the oil and gas industry, assets matter a lot. For companies operating here, there's nothing more important than reserves, rigs, submersibles, and refineries. However, these assets must be capable of generating profitable returns.

Value for money
These returns indicate whether a given company has the capability of using its assets efficiently and profitably. After all, it makes little sense for an exploration and production company to have a lot of acreage, but not the ability to pull out the oil within (or natural gas, for that matter). In short, it pays to find out how valuable these assets are to the company.

Here, we will find out whether a given company's assets are profitable and efficient compared to its peers based on some important metrics:

  • Return on assets, or net income divided by total assets shows how much the company is earning compared against the assets it controls. The ratio is an indication of how effectively the company is converting the money it has invested in reserves, property, and other equipment into net earnings. The higher the value, the more profitable the assets are. The metric is pretty useful when used as a comparative measure -- against peers and also against the industry in general. A value greater than 5.1% is what investors should be looking for in this industry.
  • Fixed-asset turnover ratio, or revenue divided by total fixed assets (like plant, property, and equipment). Fixed assets form a major chunk of total assets for companies in this industry. This metric shows how efficiently the company is using its fixed assets to generate revenue. The higher the turnover rate, the better. A value of 0.55 looks pretty good.
  • Total enterprise value/discounted future cash flows shows how expensive the company is when compared against its standardized future cash flows. The denominator indicates the total present value of estimated future cash inflows from proved reserves, less future development and production costs, discounted at 10% per annum. It's based on today's energy prices and doesn't give any credit for unproved reserves.

With these factors in mind, let's take a look at Penn West Petroleum (NYSE: PWE  ) and see how it stacks up against its peers:

Company

Return on Assets

Fixed-Asset Turnover Ratio

P/B

TEV/DFCF

Penn West Petroleum 0.1% 0.3 0.78 1.46

Nexen

(NYSE: NXY  )

5.6% 0.4 1.06 1.33

Baytex Energy

(NYSE: BTE  )

6.7% 0.5 4.43 2.26

Continental Resources

(NYSE: CLR  )

3.3% 0.4 4.47 2.50

Source: Capital IQ, a Standard & Poor's company; company filings.

Penn West Petroleum's assets don't seem to generate great returns compared to its peers and the industry at large. Its asset turnover is among the weakest as well. The company hasn't really recovered since the recession.

The company's price-to-book value looks cheap. However, this might be justified. The ratio is now below its five-year historical average of 1.41. It seems investors are staying away from this stock. This could either mean a buying opportunity, or it might altogether be a bad buy. Investors should dig deeper. 

Foolish bottom line
This isn't the only criterion you can use, although assets generally indicate how oil and gas companies have been faring in terms of operations. You can get a more comprehensive understanding by digging deeper. However, on the surface, Penn West Petroleum doesn't appear to offer the best opportunity in the industry.

We at The Motley Fool will help you to stay up to speed on the top news and analysis on Penn West. You can start by adding it to your watchlist.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Fool contributor Isac Simon does not own shares of any of the companies mentioned in this article. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On September 27, 2011, at 12:35 AM, FreeCan wrote:

    Isac Simon has a good approach to value a company, but doesn't say what time period he used to calculate the value of Penn West. Using Google's stats for 2010 full year net income (1,110 million$) and total assets of 14,543 million dollars, the return on net assets is 7.6% and blows away the competition used in the article. Please be more specific or more accurate - dispersing inaccurate information is slanderous.

  • Report this Comment On September 27, 2011, at 4:18 AM, isacsimon wrote:

    @FreeCan,

    Unfortunately Google's stats are incorrect. I have double checked the data from the company's annual filings (http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1334388/0001279569110... as well Capital IQ. Penn West's full year net income for 2010 is USD 227.2 million, while its total assets are USD 13,440.6 million. This gives a return on net assets (RONA) of 1.6%. Since return on assets (ROA) is calculated using operating income, the value comes to 0.01% (Operating income for 2010 was $3 million).

    ROA has improved marginally in the twelve months leading to June 2011 to 0.1% since operating income has risen to $30.1 million.

    You can also verify using Yahoo! Finance:

    http://finance.yahoo.com/q/ks?s=PWE+Key+Statistics

    -Isac

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2011, at 6:24 PM, FreeCan wrote:

    How could operating income in 2010 be $3million? Penn West's operating income is $25.13 per barrel x 164,633 barrels a day = operating income of about 4 million dollars a day! Not a year... Operating income was 369 million $ for the last quarter in 2011.

    My point was simply that you suggested in your article how to value a company, but didn't give time frames. I'm not a financial wizard, but I really don't like it when you misprint statistics. You also can't use RONA for one company and then ROA on another.

    Why does the Google website give a return on average assets as 7.81%?

  • Report this Comment On September 28, 2011, at 6:59 PM, BBBoston wrote:

    Good grief, this appears to be another article written by a number cruncher who doesn't understand that up until the end of 2010, PWE was a trust that had negligible earnings because it distributed its cash flow to the trust's beneficiaries (shareholders). If you want to know how the company is doing now that it's a corporation, you have to look at the 6 month earnings from the first half of 2011. From the company's quarterly reports, the earnings are $ 562 million. Divide that by the assets of $ 14.5 billion and you get about a 4% return in 6 months, which is quite lovely.

    Please post a retraction of your article.

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2011, at 3:15 AM, raybiese wrote:

    Applying a R-on-NA analysis is just silly when looking at an O&G income trust. O&G income trusts were all about R-of-NA. Income trusts were all about management working to re-gain NetA/unit that was distributed to unitholders in a tax efficient manner. Penn West has done a good job of this.

    Ask yourself what is the difference between a distribution and a dividend? How are these accounted for in US filings or metric ratios? How does this affect corporate investments for "Growth"?

    Isn't RonNA just another metric for "Growth"? Isn't RofNA a better metric for income investor ROI?

    Here is the data (C$):

    2010: BDist=1.56 NetA/Unit=8189/459.7=17.84

    2009: BDist=2.04 NetA/Unit=7918/421.6=18.78

    2008: BDist=4.08 NetA/Unit=8380/386.5=21.68

    2007: BDist=4.08 NetA/Unit=4570/242.7=18.83

    2006: BDist=4.05 NetA/Unit=5188/237.1=21.88

    So if I bought 1 unit in Jan/06, I have received $15.81 in distributions by Dec/10. In Jan/06 units sold for $40 and now sell for $16. So I am 'down' ~$9 since Jan/06. Oh well. As of Jan/11 units sold for $25. If I bought in Jan/09 for $15, I would have collected $3.60 for 2009 & 2010 still up $1 despite the +40% haircut since Mar/11. Things go up & down.

    Traders love these wild swings. Investors do not.

    Penn West was an investment while an income trust. Here are the 'not-reinvested' annual yields for $40/unit in Jan/06:

    2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

    10.13% 11.35% 12.80% 7.34% 6.06%

    As of Dec 31/10, I would still have $24.19 invested in Penn West. The rest is in my pocket. Plus the net assets are still hovering around $19, same as in 2006.

    So what is next now that the 'income trust' format is gone and Penn West is now a 'company'?

    I fully expect Penn West to remain a shareholder friendly company after conversion from a trust. I like their huge long-term asset base and the shift to horizontal light oil. The (unwarranted) 'Cushing Discount' will go away eventually and they will get a fair price for their product.

    Traders be damned. I used to be an investor. Penn West was, and still is, one of my 'fire & forget' investments in the 'income' part of my portfolio. The income part? You betcha.

    Let's see.... Buy some junk bonds yielding 7% or buy Penn West at 6.7%? (2011 dividend: $0.27X4/$16=6.75%) Risk vs reward? No contest.

    Try investing some time. You might like it.

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2011, at 8:53 PM, gankai wrote:

    Wow - no corrections - no retractions. I hope that the Lawyers from PWE have fun with you and the Motley FOOLS

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2011, at 9:23 PM, gankai wrote:

    I am so tired of this type of BS that I filed a complaint with the SEC.

  • Report this Comment On September 29, 2011, at 9:25 PM, gankai wrote:

    Here is the link - if you are silent you will get what you deserve:

    http://www.sec.gov/

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1559305, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 4:29:32 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 19 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:01 PM
PWE $13.67 Down -0.12 -0.87%
Penn West Petroleu… CAPS Rating: ****
NXY $16.17 Up +0.18 +1.13%
Nexen, Inc. (USA) CAPS Rating: ***
CLR $75.95 Up +1.53 +2.06%
Continental Resour… CAPS Rating: ****
BTE $46.60 Up +0.55 +1.19%
Baytex Energy Trus… CAPS Rating: ***

Advertisement