Recs

4

Could 4G Threaten iPhone Sales?

I recently wrote about Samsung's smartphone sales eclipsing those of Apple's (Nasdaq: AAPL  ) iPhone for the quarter just past. That was an unprecedented achievement for Samsung, but one that provoked a big "so what?" from some readers of my article.

One thing I said was that the anticipation building up over the release of the next iPhone model may have affected present iPhone model sales numbers. Many iPhone buyers would rather wait a month or two for the latest iteration from Cupertino's finest, than to have the embarrassment of premature expenditure and suffer iPhone feature envy. Hence, perhaps, a temporary blip in Apple's sales figures?

What's in a number?
As it turned out, Apple held back a bit with its latest release, and introduced in early October, not the long-awaited iPhone 5, but what it called the iPhone 4S. Even though the upgrades in the 4S included a more powerful processor, a better camera, and the well-received Siri voice-recognition software, many reviewers seemed very disappointed that it wasn't what they considered to be a "full-blown" upgrade. The stock market's immediate reaction to the iPhone 4S was a big sell-off; Apple shares plummeted 5% before recovering by the end of the trading day. But iPhone sales didn't stumble, selling a record 4 million units during its first weekend.

That sales triumph came about even though the iPhone 4S still lacked one feature that could prove to be the most important quality that the smartphones of 2012, and for several years beyond, must have. I'm referring to the ability to run on a 4G network, especially an LTE network -- even better, an LTE-advanced network.

During the second quarter, the one in which Samsung smartphones outsold the iPhone, more than one in five smartphones sold in the U.S. were 4G capable, according to NPD Group. One year ago, that figure was 3%. Smartphone sales are growing exponentially. The leaders in U.S. 4G smartphone consumer sales during the second quarter were HTC with a 62% share, Samsung with 22%, Motorola Mobility (NYSE: MMI  ) with 11%, and LG with 4%.

The iPhone is still 3G.

If they can do it, why not Apple?
There certainly are plenty of incentives for Apple to produce an LTE-capable iPhone. China Mobile (NYSE: CHL  ) has been talking with Apple about producing a phone for its TD-LTE network. In September, China Mobile's chairman, Wang Jianzhou, said, "We discussed this issue with Apple. We hope Apple will produce a new iPhone with TD-LTE." China Mobile, by the way, has 621 million subscribers. That's a lot of incentive. So why isn't Apple scrambling to meet that demand?

According to Apple CEO Tim Cook, speaking as COO during a conference call last April, the LTE technology is just not up to the iPhone standards. "The first generation of LTE chipsets force a lot of design compromises with the handset, and some of those we are just not willing to make" he said.

Falling behind?
The four handset makers mentioned above have a significant head start on Apple in the 4G arena, and sales of phones powered by Google's (Nasdaq: GOOG  ) Android mobile operating system have been steadily outpacing sales of iPhones. In June, July, and August, Android phones outsold iPhones by two to one: 56% of the smartphone market to 28%, respectively.

The demand for ultra-fast mobile broadband -- and the ability to meet that demand -- is zooming. There are currently 35 LTE networks in operation worldwide, and by the end of next year that number is expected to be more than 100. LTE-capable smartphone models are becoming available even more quickly; according to the Global Mobile Suppliers Association, the number of different LTE phones has tripled in the last three months.

How much longer can consumers wait for Apple to pull into the fast lane before potential iPhone buyers check out the other offerings on their carriers' shelves? AT&T (NYSE: T  ) and Verizon (NYSE: VZ  ) have been pounding us with commercial after commercial touting their supersonic 4G networks. Even if there is more hype than reality to their claims, they can still put doubt into shoppers' minds. Whether the iPhone provides a better overall user experience than the faster phones is immaterial. It's the perception that counts.

I applaud Apple for not rushing forth with a product that it can't be proud of, but they have to be careful. Consumers can be fickle creatures, and their "must-have" instincts can change with 4G speed.

One of the features that some hoped would come with the iPhone 4S was a revolutionary new technology called "near field communication." It wasn't included with this iPhone model, but it will likely be an important part of the next generation of all smartphones. Learn about "near field communication" by requesting this special free report.

Jeff Fischer and team have demystified options. And they can rack up income like $1,030... $2,626... and $3,228 on a schedule you can set your watch by!
That's why we're glad to announce every single one of their closely guarded strategies is available to YOU during May and June – 100% FREE, no strings attached! Just enter your email address in the box below...

Fool contributor Dan Radovsky owns shares of AT&T. The Motley Fool owns shares of Google, Apple, and China Mobile. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of China Mobile, Apple, and Google. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended creating a bull call spread position in Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Read/Post Comments (6) | Recommend This Article (4)

Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On October 31, 2011, at 4:30 PM, marv08 wrote:

    Oh boy... A lot of rhetorical trickery, but not a single clear statement.

    "I'm referring to the ability to run on a 4G network, especially an LTE network -- even better, an LTE-advanced network."

    Well. Just to make sure we are talking facts here. There is no 4G network in the US. There is no 4G network in Europe. Period. LTE is technically 3.9G and the "LTE Advanced" standard (which is the first true 4G standard) has just been "frozen" in March 2011. There is not one single commercial network offering it. The existing 3.9G LTE networks do (under load and if the mobile is more than a few meters away from the cell tower) in many cases offer the same or less bandwidth than 3.5G (e.g. HSPA+) networks, which the iPhone 4S supports up to 14.4 Mbps (in theory they could support 21 Mbps, which almost no carrier offers, in exchange for less battery life - Apple, and others, were wise enough to go for the 14.4 Mbps variant). HSPA+ is as much "4G" as LTE, that is NOT.

    "The four handset makers mentioned above have a significant head start on Apple in the 4G arena, and sales of phones powered by Google's (Nasdaq: GOOG ) Android mobile operating system have been steadily outpacing sales of iPhones. In June, July, and August, Android phones outsold iPhones by two to one: 56% of the smartphone market to 28%, respectively."

    You insinuate that 4G Android handsets outsell 3G iPhones. Which is a big bold lie. Yes, Android (hundreds of models) is outselling the iPhone (2, now 3 models), but it is 3G models making up the volume here.

    "How much longer can consumers wait for Apple to pull into the fast lane before potential iPhone buyers check out the other offerings on their carriers' shelves?"

    Well, Apple was selling a 2.5G (EDGE) iPhone in 2007 when everybody was writing the same stories about 3G (we know how that went). When 3G was ready for mass-adoption, Apple was there. They will be on 4G, or rather LTE/3.9G – no Western carrier has even announced a rollout roadmap for LTE Advanced/4G yet, when it is required.

    I am currently working as an expat in India. My 4S regularly sees download speeds North of 5 Mbps (on a 14.4 Mbps connection), 5GB for less than $15 a month by the way. My wife is in Germany and consistently gets less than 4 Mbps on LTE ($110 for 3GB/month). Should be clear why fake 4G is no killer feature yet.

  • Report this Comment On October 31, 2011, at 5:40 PM, kramsigenak wrote:

    Well Dan,

    I was going to straighten you out in your fluff article, but marv08 beat me to it.

    You said " Even if there is more hype than reality to their claims, they can still put doubt into shoppers' minds." No, maybe in your mind, but not shoppers. How many iPhones do you think Apple is selling? How about as many as they have the capacity to make. 4G? Not till the bugs are worked out thank you.

    When will the doubters ever get sick of being wrong on Apple?

  • Report this Comment On October 31, 2011, at 6:00 PM, fundfooll wrote:

    Thanks Marv and Kramsigenak for adding truthful insights into the 4G area. 5 thumbs up boys!

  • Report this Comment On October 31, 2011, at 6:39 PM, TMFDRadovsky wrote:

    Marv and Kram,

    I posed what I thought to be a valid question: does the lack of "4G" capability -- whatever one defines that to be -- pose a threat to the iPhone's dominance as the most desirable smartphone on the planet?

    I threw out a couple of facts, such as,

    1. Samsung's smartphones outselling the iPhone for the first time ever, in the third quarter (but I also leavened that with the iPhone faithful's anticipation of the IPhone 5/4S release as the possible cause of lower sales); and

    2. the Adroid phones dominance in total market share of new smartphones sold during June, July, and August.

    Now, I can deduce from these hard figures that Samsung is working as hard as it can to sell smartphones, and that consumers take Android seriously.

    However, those figures do not suggest, nor did I suggest that the iPhone was inferior to any other phone.

    Marv brings out a very good point, that what the carriers are calling "4G" does not necessarily meet the actual 4G standard. "4G" has become a marketing buzz word. I think I should have spoken to that, and it is something I would like to address in a future piece.

    Consumers are human too, and are affected by whatever buzz words are bandied about.

    Marv, I did not say that 4G handsets outsell 3G iPhones.

    Kram, I am standing by my last paragraph.

    Could I have written a better piece? Yes, but I would still be posing the title question.

    I appreciate you folks reading and responding, and I always appreciate constructive criticism.

    Dan

  • Report this Comment On October 31, 2011, at 6:40 PM, rstoner19 wrote:

    iPhone's 4s "lack" of 4G is potentially theoretical. The speeds it is able to download and upload are competitive against most "4G" phones. While it does not support LTE, how many areas support LTE? Is the infrastructure set up to support the bandwidth that iPhone users bring? How much more does it cost to put in technology for the phone to be able to achieve LTE? How much will it affect the battery life? These are all questions that if you look at, it doesn't make sense to include a 4G in the iPhone 4S. What makes Apple's user satisfaction results so high is that Apple does not look at what specs it can promote, it looks at what will give the best user experience. The new dual antenna was an ingenius solution for the 4G and one that will give the extreme majority of users the better experience. What good is a feature if you can't use it?

  • Report this Comment On October 31, 2011, at 7:01 PM, rstoner19 wrote:

    Dan,

    Despite all the comments justifying Apple's choice of not going with a "4G" phone, I do want to express my gratitude for you writing this. It does make us think about potential issues and reaffirm/reassess our investment strategies. It is rarely a bad idea to questions investments and companies. Consumers can be finicky and a moment to consider what negative consequences could result isn't a bad thing. As Steve Jobs would have said, "You're a dumb sh!#," implying work harder, it may not be a bad idea, but continue to improve. (If you don't get the reference read the biography of Steve Jobs)

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1580761, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/19/2013 10:01:29 AM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 1 day ago Sponsored by:
DOW 15,354.40 121.18 0.80%
S&P 500 1,667.47 17.00 1.03%
NASD 3,498.97 33.73 0.97%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/17/2013 4:00 PM
AAPL $433.26 Down -1.32 -0.30%
Apple CAPS Rating: ****
T $37.44 Up +0.06 +0.16%
AT&T CAPS Rating: ***
VZ $53.35 Up +0.15 +0.28%
Verizon Communicat… CAPS Rating: ****
MMI $0.00 Down +0.00 +0.00%
Motorola Mobility… CAPS Rating: ***
CHL $55.32 Up +0.38 +0.69%
China Mobile CAPS Rating: ****
GOOG $909.18 Up +5.31 +0.59%
Google CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement