Recs

4

A Hidden Reason That Alcatel-Lucent's Earnings Are Outstanding

It takes money to make money. Most investors know that, but with business media so focused on the "how much," very few investors bother to ask, "How fast?"

When judging a company's prospects, how quickly it turns cash outflows into cash inflows can be just as important as how much profit it's booking in the accounting fantasy world we call "earnings." This is one of the first metrics I check when I'm hunting for the market's best stocks. Today, we'll see how it applies to Alcatel-Lucent (NYSE: ALU  ) .

Let's break this down
In this series, we measure how swiftly a company turns cash into goods or services and back into cash. We'll use a quick, relatively foolproof tool known as the cash conversion cycle, or CCC for short.

Why does the CCC matter? The less time it takes a firm to convert outgoing cash into incoming cash, the more powerful and flexible its profit engine is. The less money tied up in inventory and accounts receivable, the more available to grow the company, pay investors, or both.

To calculate the cash conversion cycle, add days inventory outstanding to days sales outstanding, then subtract days payable outstanding. Like golf, the lower your score here, the better.

Here's the CCC for Alcatel-Lucent, alongside the comparable figures from a few competitors and peers.

Company

TTM Revenue

TTM CCC

 Alcatel-Lucent $24,071  11
 Arris Group (Nasdaq: ARRS  ) $1,074  83
 ADTRAN (Nasdaq: ADTN  ) $707  103
 Ciena (Nasdaq: CIEN  ) $1,704  109

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. Data is current as of last fully reported fiscal quarter. TTM = trailing 12 months.

For younger, fast-growth companies, the CCC can give you valuable insight into the sustainability of that growth. A company that's taking longer to make cash may need to tap financing to keep its momentum. For older, mature companies, the CCC can tell you how well the company is managed. Firms that begin to lose control of the CCC may be losing their clout with their suppliers (who might be demanding stricter payment terms) and customers (who might be demanding more generous terms). This can sometimes be an important signal of future distress -- one most investors are likely to miss.

While I find peer comparisons useful, I'm most interested in comparing a company's CCC to its prior performance. Here's where I believe all investors need to become trend-watchers. Sure, there may be legitimate reasons for an increase in the CCC, but all things being equal, I want to see this number stay steady or move downward over time.

anImage

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FY = fiscal year. TTM = trailing 12 months.

Because of the seasonality in some businesses, the CCC for the TTM period may not be strictly comparable to the fiscal-year periods shown in the chart. Even the steadiest-looking businesses on an annual basis will experience some quarterly fluctuations in the CCC. To get an understanding of the usual ebb and flow at Alcatel-Lucent, consult the quarterly period chart below.

anImage

Source: S&P Capital IQ. Dollar amounts in millions. FQ = fiscal quarter.

On a 12-month basis, the trend at Alcatel-Lucent looks very good. At 10.8 days, it is 16.9 days better than the five-year average of 27.7 days. The biggest contributor to that improvement was DSO, which improved 24.5 days compared to the five-year average. That was partially offset by a 8.2-day increase in DIO.

Considering the numbers on a quarterly basis, the CCC trend at Alcatel-Lucent looks good. At 13.5 days, it is 0.8 days better than the average of the past eight quarters. With both 12-month and quarterly CCC running better than average, Alcatel-Lucent gets high marks in this cash-conversion checkup.

Though the CCC can take a little work to calculate, it's definitely worth watching every quarter. You'll be better informed about potential problems, and you'll improve your odds of finding the underappreciated home run stocks that provide the market's best returns.

To stay on top of the CCC for your favorite companies, just use the handy links below to add companies to your free watchlist.

The Steve Jobs Betrayal
You may already know that in the final year of his life, Jobs revealed a stunning betrayal — and told his biographer, "I will spend my last dying breath... and every penny of Apple's $40 billion in the bank to right this wrong." What was it that made Jobs so irate — and why could it make a few in-the-know investors some major profits over the coming months and years?

Enter your email address below to find out what made Jobs so enraged!

Seth Jayson had no position in any company mentioned here at the time of publication. You can view his stock holdings here. He is co-advisor of Motley Fool Hidden Gems, which provides new small-cap ideas every month, backed by a real-money portfolio. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

 


Comments from our Foolish Readers

Help us keep this a respectfully Foolish area! This is a place for our readers to discuss, debate, and learn more about the Foolish investing topic you read about above. Help us keep it clean and safe. If you believe a comment is abusive or otherwise violates our Fool's Rules, please report it via the Report this Comment Report this Comment icon found on every comment.

  • Report this Comment On November 15, 2011, at 2:07 AM, dotdeath wrote:

    Except for the fact that ALU discounts customer receivables to the tune of EUR700m-EUIR1bn. Those receivables are sold to financial institutions without recourse - the bank or whoever then chases the France Telecom or AT&T bill, for a small fee, while ALU gets cash upfront and its working capital requirements look good.

    This is fine (because it is sold without recourse) from a liability perspective, but it is not that great for margins/profits (more cash in the bank today earns you nothing, but it costs to sell receivables).

    This practice is the hallmark of a company that has liquidity issues. Althought ALU seems to have a ton of cash on its balance sheet, a large chunk is restricted cash in foreign subsidiaries (for example EUR1bn at Alcatel Shanghai Bell, a 50/50 JV with the Shanghai city authority where ALU has a narrow 50% plus one share majority). For the rest of the apparent cash on balance sheet, a large amount is required for intra-quarterly working capital swings which are significant, before ALU dresses its BS up for the quarterly results (with the sale of receivables, for example).

    So ALU's good WCR metrics vs peers maybe aren't that great, and maybe (this requires checking, though) its current metrics vs historical data is improving because they sell more receivables without recourse.

Add your comment.

Compare Brokers

Fool Disclosure

DocumentId: 1585633, ~/Articles/ArticleHandler.aspx, 5/26/2012 8:07:47 PM

Report This Comment

Use this area to report a comment that you believe is in violation of the community guidelines. Our team will review the entry and take any appropriate action.

Sending report...

Today's Market

updated 22 hours ago Sponsored by:
DOW 12,454.83 -74.92 -0.60%
S&P 500 1,317.82 -2.86 -0.22%
NASD 2,837.53 -1.85 -0.07%

Create My Watchlist

Go to My Watchlist

You don't seem to be following any stocks yet!

Better investing starts with a watchlist. Now you can create a personalized watchlist and get immediate access to the personalized information you need to make successful investing decisions.

Data delayed up to 5 minutes

Related Tickers

5/25/2012 4:01 PM
ALU $1.67 Up +0.07 +4.38%
Alcatel-Lucent (AD… CAPS Rating: ***
CIEN $11.84 Down -0.11 -0.92%
Ciena Corp CAPS Rating: **
ARRS $12.32 Down -0.01 -0.08%
Arris Group, Inc. CAPS Rating: *****
ADTN $30.09 Up +0.29 +0.97%
ADTRAN, Inc. CAPS Rating: ****

Advertisement